Boris johnson’s claim of a ‘mandate’ from the people isn’t accurate – here’s how prime ministers really get power

Theconversation

Boris johnson’s claim of a ‘mandate’ from the people isn’t accurate – here’s how prime ministers really get power"


Play all audios:

Loading...

Boris Johnson’s time as Conservative party leader has come to an end, after a chaotic week marked by rebellion from his cabinet. But despite the wave of resignations and calls from his top


ministers to step down, Johnson has held on as long as he could. Throughout, he has claimed he had a “mandate” from Conservative voters who delivered him an 80-seat majority in the 2019


general election, to stay on as prime minister. Even into his resignation speech, Johnson spoke to “the millions of people who voted for us in 2019 … Thank you for that incredible mandate.”


Johnson’s few defenders have decried the revolt from his ministers as an anti-democratic “coup d'etat”. Pro-Brexit think tank the Bruges Group tweeted that Johnson was being “forced


out” undemocratically. At the time of writing, Johnson is still in post, and planning to stay as caretaker prime minister until he is replaced. Whether that happens remains to be seen, but


if it does, it won’t be because of a “mandate” directly from the people. Unlike the US, with its famous constitution codified into a single document subject to careful scrutiny, the UK’s


constitution is a collection of laws and rules which have emerged over time. In the US, the head of state is the president, elected every four years with clearly delineated powers and


responsibilities. In the UK, the head of state is the monarch. However, a lengthy series of processes over centuries have incrementally stripped the monarchy of direct power. Instead,


executive power is delegated to ministers and, first among equals, the prime minister. They form the government of the day, and effectively govern as representatives of the Queen, who is


constitutionally required to remain steadfastly neutral in political affairs. So, how are prime ministers selected, and where do they actually get their power? In essence, the House of


Commons is supreme. Theoretically, every five years (though often more frequently) the membership of the House of Commons is put to the people. Voters are asked to choose someone to


represent them as their member of parliament (MP). An MP represents one of 650 constituencies, most of which have an average of around 70,000 voters. The monarch then, after an election,


invites the MP with enough support from within the House of Commons to the palace and asks them to form a government. They are then to select ministers, drawn from the body of MPs in the


House of Commons and the peers in the House of Lords. PARTY POWER This, in essence, means that power is held by the MP who can command the support of a majority of other MPs. This is


somewhat complicated by the party-political system. Naturally, politicians of roughly similar perspectives arrange themselves into broad camps. These camps have developed over time into


political parties, where individuals selected by their party stand for election under that party’s banner and published manifesto of agreed policy positions. Naturally, voters tend to


gravitate to parties which better reflect their individual views and cast their votes accordingly. In the UK, the party system has emerged such that the leader of the victorious party in an


election typically is invited to form a government. There are some exceptions to this. For instance, Nicola Sturgeon, leader of the Scottish National Party, is a member of the Scottish


parliament and not an MP at Westminster. Some elections produce a “hung Parliament”, when no party has enough MPs to form a government. In these instances, parties must work with MPs from


rival parties to form a government. For instance, in 2017 the Conservatives forged a confidence and supply agreement with the Democratic Unionist Party, and in 2010 went into coalition with


the Liberal Democrats. The party system, in conjunction with the presumed qualities of a given party leader, is a powerful draw at the ballot box. Many people may vote based on the leader or


values of the party. But, whether they realise it or not, they are actually voting for an individual representative, not a government or PM. This has long been the case. In the Conservative


Party, leaders are chosen from within the parliamentary party. Candidates must be nominated by at least eight MPs and, through rounds of voting, the two left standing are put to the


membership of the wider Conservative Party. If the Conservatives control a majority of seats in the House of Commons, that leader will be able to form a government. In an important speech in


1774, one of the founders of modern Conservatism, Edmund Burke, said that, “Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays, instead of serving you, if


he sacrifices it to your opinion.” In other words, we elect representatives to act, based on their own judgement, on our behalf. We do not elect automatons who are merely there to vote


according to the wishes of constituent party members or party voters. They must do what they feel is best for their community and the country. This not only applies to how they vote on


specific pieces of legislation, but is essential to how they select party leaders and, in turn, prime ministers. MPs grant power through their support. If that support evaporates, the


government falls. This is not new. In 2019, Theresa May lost the support of the majority of MPs in the House of Commons and was forced to tender her resignation to the Queen. In fact, since


1940, nine prime ministers have assumed office between elections. In short, Boris Johnson’s mandate never came from the 14 million votes that his party representatives won on December 12,


2019. It came from the elected MPs. And he has resigned because that support of free-thinking individual representatives has now been withdrawn.


Trending News

Preserving the dignity of our aging parents

PROVIDE CHOICES "Being able to offer an array of options regarding the small, daily things is essential,” says Trac...

Taiwan tries to smooth china's ruffled feathers

WASHINGTON — Taiwan sought Monday to defuse a diplomatic row over its president’s call for an independence vote, saying ...

China only evacuated taiwanese who were 'chinese'

China's embassy only evacuated the Taiwanese tourists stranded in Japan by Typhoon Jebi who identified as Chinese, ...

When remote learning goes wrong: zoom classes for preschoolers can be extra burdens on parents who just want refunds

2010-11 (Combined average): 6.19%Best year: 2007 (9.23%)Worst year: 2009 (3.15%)When the recession was at its worst, the...

Montana wildfires reignite logging debate

AILSA CHANG, HOST: Montana has had one of the worst wildfire seasons in decades. It's ended in large part because o...

Latests News

Boris johnson’s claim of a ‘mandate’ from the people isn’t accurate – here’s how prime ministers really get power

Boris Johnson’s time as Conservative party leader has come to an end, after a chaotic week marked by rebellion from his ...

Scotland leads the world by example on climate action — scottish national party

CONTACT Scottish National Party Gordon Lamb House 3 Jackson's Entry Edinburgh, Scotland EH8 8PJ tel: 0800 633 5432 ...

The aarp minute: october 20, 2021

Memorial Day Sale! Join AARP for just $11 per year with a 5-year membership Join now and get a FREE gift. Expires 6/4  G...

Leadership election 2023 — scottish national party

A leadership election is being held following First Minister Nicola Sturgeon’s announcement that she is standing down. W...

Have you saved enough?

Est&aacutes saliendo del sitio web AARP.org y te diriges a un sitio web que no est&aacute operado por AARP. Se r...

Top