Britain’s broken politics: rory stewart’s memoirs of an insider | thearticle

“An excoriating picture of a shamefully dysfunctional political culture”.  Not a comment on the recent ITV series _Mr. Bates vs. The Post Office__ — _this is Rowan Williams, the former

Archbishop of Canterbury, on the cover of Rory Stewart’s _Politics on the Edge: A Memoir from Within_ Jonathan Cape 2023.  Yet the book exposes the profound weaknesses in governance that

enabled the Post Office scandal to happen. Stewart’s book focuses on the story of his decade in Tory politics and government from 2009-2019.   It carries conviction with those who ought to

know.  Peter Hennessy, crossbench peer and constitutional historian, describes it as “a study in pain and disillusionment”. Michael Ignatieff, former Liberal Party leader of the Opposition

in Canada and distinguished academic, speaks of its portrayal of “lying, incompetence and treachery”. These three reviewers are all accomplished authors. Two bring exceptional political

experience to their writing.   Stewart’s account carries conviction with those who ought to know. The book provides an explanation for how the Government can speak of appointing 150

additional judges to speed up the deportation of asylum seekers and migrants to Rwanda, judged an unsafe country by our courts, whilst, allegedly through lack of staff, taking many years to

process compensation for unsafe convictions of sub postmasters and mistresses, pillars of the community. Stewart shares many of his reviewers’ writing skills, keeping the reader turning the

pages as he talks about his epic walks in Asia and the Middle East and his professional life as a soldier before entering politics.  There are insights from his different roles in

Afghanistan, the group think and disastrous levels of conviction bias that ended in the bungled evacuation from Kabul in August 2021. Maybe Stewart is one of those “unpatriotic,

Britain-belittling doom-mongers”. This is from a recent Lancaster House speech by our present Secretary of State for Defence. Grant Shapps is rated as one of the government’s best

communicators. In the past he has communicated using four different names and his political career recently included, within two years, four different ministries.   Or put in another way,

Stewart tries to tell the truth about politicians like Shapps and knows what he’s talking about. _Politics on the Edge_ is not just a litany of lying and dysfunction. There are witty

descriptions of the humiliations involved in getting selected for a parliamentary constituency while failing to present always the Party line.  Then follows the main story of the rocky road

he walked as a Member of Parliament. His first boss, David Cameron, gets few praise-notes.  Despite practical steps to increase diversity in the Conservative Party, the members of Cameron’s

inner circle were mostly (like Stewart himself) Etonians, so policy was decided by “an unimaginably narrow social group”.  Stewart shows considerable self-awareness, acknowledging the greasy

pole Cameron had to climb to become Prime Minister.  But he and Cameron were chalk and cheese. A common criticism of Rory Stewart is that he was, and remains, “naive”.  At first, he lacked

knowledge and experience of the snakes and ladders of political life, but he brought to the job the wisdom and judgement he had developed in different contexts.  At times acting out of

conscience without being, Corbyn-style, a professionally disloyal parliamentarian, he risks defying the Tory Whips.  By the time Boris Johnson pushed him out of Conservative politics in 2019

he had become a national figure. In contrast to _Yes Minister’s _portrayal, some may even find his treatment of top civil servants to be too understanding and benign.  They keep things

going while ministers come and go, but they can be stubborn and evasive – at times successfully resisting policy change.  Stewart found the power relations in the Department for

International Development, as both a junior minister and as Secretary of State, particularly trying.  While acknowledging the important role of aid in the global projection of the UK and

giving Cameron credit for his commitment to the 0.7% GDP target, he encourages the suspicion that the department with an annual budget of “£13 billion, more than ten times the core budget of

the British Foreign Office”, was a little too big for its boots.   Yes, but the Foreign Office was not a department funding projects globally. And DFID and the FCO were of course later

amalgamated by Johnson, with hostile intent. Stewart got on well with Theresa May, who made him a rather reluctant Minister of State for prisons in the Ministry of Justice. This is where his

passion for practical action best shines out.  Prisoners are grabbing drugs delivered by drones hovering outside broken windows – mend the broken windows, do a few simple reforms.   Reading

Stewart’s account of prison conditions and their neglect by government is deeply shaming.  It raises questions about our claim to be a civilised society.  And in parenthesis, the absence of

any mention of conversations with prison chaplains by such an advocate of “listening” is some measure of his – admitted — general distaste for religion. The least interesting chapters of

_Politics on the Edge_ are those about the quagmire of Brexit negotiations — though, as did many others, Stewart soon spots Boris Johnson for the charlatan he is.  After the resignation of

Theresa May, his blow-by-blow account of the live TV debate in June 2019 trying to come through an experienced field of four other Tory leadership contenders — Johnson didn’t take part – and

detailing his own miserable performance, is a painful study in hubris. What, as Lenin said, is to be done?  Stewart doesn’t offer any coherent plan for reforming politics.  Nor is there an

obvious solution to offer.  But he is clearly right that ministers need time to understand the complexities of the issues they face, even _what_ issues they must face.  Successive ministers

responsible for the Post Office failed or were unable to challenge its entrenched hierarchy.  Appointing Secretaries of State for a minimum three-year term, barring obvious incompetence,

would be helpful. Party leaderships also perhaps need to allow more unwhipped votes. Differences can be creative.  All parties need to join in countering the manufactured public opinion that

disagreement always indicates a divided party not fit for government.  Politics as a conscience-free, value-free zone of human endeavour isn’t desirable, hasn’t worked and doesn’t work.  It

lies behind our worst national scandals.  Fortunately not all politicians practise it. Does Rory Stewart provide a necessary prophetic voice or an irritatingly arrogant one?  It hardly

matters how he comes across as a person. Our politics _is_ on the edge.  Not yet teetering over it, as in the USA.  There are two ways to travel when approaching the edge: away from it or

over it.  And not moving, paralysed by disillusion, or providing ever new descriptions and analyses of the problems rather than doing something about them, as Tony Blair once put it, leaves

you dangerously near the edge. I hope _Politics on the Edge _is not Stewart’s political swansong.  We need alternative voices.  Having shed his illusions, perhaps he should try again, this

time in the Labour Party. A MESSAGE FROM THEARTICLE _We are the only publication that’s committed to covering every angle. We have an important contribution to make, one that’s needed now

more than ever, and we need your help to continue publishing throughout these hard economic times. So please, make a donation._