Judge trims san diego collusion cases targeting goldman sachs, wells fargo, other big banks

Timesofsandiego

Judge trims san diego collusion cases targeting goldman sachs, wells fargo, other big banks"


Play all audios:

Loading...

A federal judge on Tuesday narrowed claims by San Diego and Baltimore in antitrust litigation seeking to hold eight banks liable for driving up interest rates on municipal bonds. The rates


determine what state and local governments must pay on a popular tax-exempt bond. U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan dismissed San Diego’s breach of fiduciary claims against


affiliates of Barclays, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs Group and JPMorgan Chase & Co, citing the city’s lack of an “agency” relationship with the banks. He dismissed Baltimore’s similar claim


against JPMorgan. The judge also said it was premature to find that San Diego, which sued last June, waited too long to pursue fraudulent concealment claims, despite its alleged notice of a


suspected conspiracy among the banks from a 2014 whistleblower lawsuit. Lawyers for San Diego and Baltimore did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Other defendants include


affiliates of Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Royal Bank of Canada and Wells Fargo & Co. San Diego and Baltimore, as well as Philadelphia, have been suing over alleged collusion to


raise rates on variable-rate demand obligations (VRDOs), once a more than $400-billion market, from 2008 to 2016. VRDOs are long-term bonds with short-term rates that typically reset weekly.


Banks must remarket VRDOs that investors redeem to other investors at the lowest possible rates. Cities have accused the banks of sharing proprietary information about bond inventories and


planned rate changes, dissuading redemptions and enabling the banks to collect remarketing and service fees for little or no work. The cities have said the collusion reduced available


funding for essential municipal services such as hospitals, power and water supplies, schools and transportation. The case is Philadelphia et al v Bank of America Corp et al, U.S. District


Court, Southern District of New York, No. 19-01608. _(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York, editing by Chris Reese)_ – _Reuters_


Trending News

Monitoring Phone Conversations

Monitoring Phone ConversationsHeadlines Only Load MoreJune 5, 2025Berkeley, California Think you know AI? Prove it. With...

Political cartoon u. S. Trump golf trade war tariffs diplomacy

SIGN UP FOR THE WEEK'S FREE NEWSLETTERS From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the be...

Warner bros. Discovery sues nba over new media rights deal, saying it matched amazon

Warner Bros. Discovery filed a lawsuit Friday against the NBA over the new media rights deal that cuts out the league’s ...

Queen letizia’s £6m wedding dress more expensive than kate’s

The bride wore a beautiful dress by Spanish designer Manuel Pertegaz. Queen Letizia tops the charts with her £6million d...

Study finds media's hmo coverage mostly neutral

In the current movie “As Good as It Gets,” actress Helen Hunt launches into a tirade about the “greedy” HMO she accuses ...

Latests News

Judge trims san diego collusion cases targeting goldman sachs, wells fargo, other big banks

A federal judge on Tuesday narrowed claims by San Diego and Baltimore in antitrust litigation seeking to hold eight bank...

Land belongs to hindu deity aadi vishweshwar mahadev, says counsel for petitioners in gyanvapi case

The Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not apply in the Gyanvapi mosque-Shringar Gauri complex case and Hindus should be a...

Princess charlotte and louis could both spend special day in lockdown

Kate, Duchess of Cambridge, 38, and Prince William, 37, left London with their three children last month and have been s...

Lok Sabha polls 2024: EC sets up over 200 polling stations in Uttar Pradesh to increase voter turnout

Newsletters ePaper Sign in HomeIndiaKarnatakaOpinionWorldBusinessSportsVideoEntertainmentDH SpecialsOperation SindoorNew...

Govt is okay with consensual sex at 16

The government has proposed to lower the age for consensual sex from 18 to 16. It has also sought the reintroduction of ...

Top