‘hannah gadsby: douglas’ succeeds even in a post-nanette world

_NOTE:_ _The review may contain spoilers_ Hannah Gadsby’s new Netflix stand-up special _Hannah Gadsby: Douglas _comes in a post-_Nanette _world and the Australian comedian is deeply aware of

the baggage that could (and possibly does) follow in the aftermath of her 2017 performance. It’s a conversation she doesn’t shy away from initiating. In fact, within the first two minutes

of the (roughly) hour-long special, Gadsby addresses the elephant in the room by asking her audience, “If you’re here because of _Nanette_... Why?” She then launches a slew of unsurprising

digs about “putting all my trauma eggs in one basket.” Her opening - a detached, third-person breakdown of her hugely successful anti-comedy special _Nanette - _forces her audience to shed

any expectations they might have unconsciously preserved. But for Gadsby, the game doesn’t end there. Gadsby dives into a “prelude” of sorts where she essentially lists out everything that’s

about to follow. She familiarises us with the format of _Hannah Gadsby: Douglas. _An observational comedy beginning about Americans, a “curious incident” from when she took her dog out for

a walk, a careful joke section, some “needling of the patriarchy”, followed by creative “hate-baiting”, and finally her big Autism reveal. Turns out, Gadsby is more than happy giving away

spoilers of her own show even before its begins. Some would call this extremely odd and slightly clinical deconstruction of her own performance as bold. She’s not just telling us what’s

going to follow but she’s also telling us when exactly we’ll be laughing. It’s risky, for sure but it also gives Gadsby an upper hand. > If in ‘Nanette’, Gadsby offered us her 

vulnerability on a plate; > in ‘Douglas’ she’s reclaiming the same without taking away > from the attachment her audiences might have harboured post > ‘Nanette.’ By this point, we

know that thematically _Douglas _will not disappoint but it’s Gadsby’s writing that will decide the fate of this performance. The rest of the performance is an exceptionally layered

experience brimming with a lot of back-and-forths which at times, I’ll be honest, get exhausting. I personally needed to pause just so I could process the genius of Hannah Gadsby. For every

sub-segment, she breaks the ice with a joke that’s actually quite funny and then launches into her brand of raging comedy. Her prior templatization of the performance effectively works here

as the context is already established and Gadsby has the freedom to be herself without having to prove anything. > It’s towards the latter half of the show that we get to > 

re-experience the thunderous rage of ‘Nanette’ - in some bits. Considering the standard she has set for herself, Gadsby in _Douglas_ is relatively more light and entertaining but drowning in

brilliance nevertheless. She dives deep into uncovering the roots of patriarchy by talking about men and how they’ve always been in charge of naming things. This is followed by a little

lecture-style segment where she uses art history to evoke laughter. Her hate-baiting segment is all about addressing the unsolicited criticism and abuse that came her way after _Nanette.

_With an exaggerated expression on her face, she says, “To this day I still get men sliding into my DMs to let me know, in all caps, that they've... never heard of me!” > Eventually,

 she circles back to the beginning when she said, “This > is a show about Autism.” She uses a childhood anecdote to shed light on her eccentricities that are, as she only recently found

out, a manifestation of her autism. It’s a light-hearted public declaration that drives home the importance of medicine and acceptance and how that shaped her personal struggle. Just like

_Nanette, _Gadsby leaves us with something to think about while ensuring that there is enough laughter - especially for the haters who’ve ‘never’ heard of her. Published: 26 May 2020, 5:44

PM IST