Driscoll, schaeffer, and packer on the size of your church and the idolatry of your heart

Mark Driscoll, from a sermon in 2006, eight years before he abandoned the church discipline process from his elders, resigned the church after ostensibly hearing from God, and eventually saw

Mars Hill Church dissolve completely: I’m a guy who is highly competitive. Advertise on TGC Every year, I want the church to grow. I want my knowledge to grow. I want my influence to grow.

I want our staff to grow. I want our church plants to grow. I want everything—because I want to win. I don’t want to just be where I’m at. I don’t want anything to be where it’s at. And so

for me it is success and drivenness and it is productivity and it is victory that drives me constantly. I—that’s my own little idol and it works well in a church because no one would ever

yell at you for being a Christian who produces results. So I found the perfect place to hide. And I was thinking about it this week. What if the church stopped growing? What if we shrunk?

What if everything fell apart? What if half the staff left? Would I still worship Jesus or would I be a total despairing mess? I don’t know. By God’s grace, I won’t have to find out, but you

never know. Francis Schaeffer: As there are no little people in God’s sight, so there are no little places. . . .  Nowhere more than in America are Christians caught in the

twentieth-century syndrome of size. Size will show success. If I am consecrated, there will necessarily be large quantities of people, dollars, etc. This is not so. Not only does God not say

that size and spiritual power go together, but He even reverses this (especially in the teaching of Jesus) and tells us to be deliberately careful not to choose a place too big for us. We

all tend to emphasize big works and big places, but all such emphasis is of the flesh. To think in such terms is simply to hearken back to the old, unconverted, egoist, self-centered _Me_.

This attitude, taken from the world, is more dangerous to the Christian than fleshly amusement or practice. It is the flesh. —Francis Schaeffer, _No Little People _(Downers Grove, IL: IVP,

1974), 18. J. I. Packer: I have found that churches, pastors, seminaries, and parachurch agencies throughout North America are mostly playing the numbers game—that is, defining success in

terms of numbers of heads counted or added to those that were there before. Church-growth theorists, evangelists, pastors, missionaries, news reporters, and others all speak as if (1)

numerical increase is what matters most; (2) numerical increase will surely come if our techniques and procedures are right; (3) numerical increase validates ministries as nothing else does;

(4) numerical increase must be everyone’s main goal. He detects four “unhappy consequences” of these assumptions: First, big and growing churches are viewed as far more significant than

others. Second, parachurch specialists who pull in large numbers are venerated, while hard-working pastors are treated as near-nonentities. Third, lively laymen and clergy too are constantly

being creamed off from the churches to run parachurch ministries, in which, just because they specialize on a relatively narrow front, quicker and more striking results can be expected.

Fourth, many ministers of not-so-bouncy temperament and not-so-flashy gifts return to secular employment in disillusionment and bitterness, concluding that the pastoral life of steady

service is a game not worth playing. Packer then offers his assessment: In all of this I seem to see a great deal of unmortified pride, either massaged, indulged, and gratified, or wounded,

nursed, and mollycoddled. Where quantifiable success is god, pride always grows strong and spreads through the soul as cancer sometimes gallops through the body. Shrinking spiritual stature

and growing moral weakness thence result, and in pastoral leaders, especially those who have become sure they are succeeding, the various forms of abuse and exploitation that follow can be

horrific. Orienting all Christian action to visible success as its goal, a move which to many moderns seems supremely sensible and businesslike, is thus more a weakness in the church than

its strength; it is a seedbed both of unspiritual vainglory for the self-rated succeeders and of unspiritual despair for the self-rated failures, and a source of shallowness and

superficiality all round. The way of health and humility is for us to admit to ourselves that in the final analysis we do not and cannot know the measure of our success the way God sees it.

Wisdom says: leave success ratings to God, and live your Christianity as a religion of faithfulness rather than an idolatry of achievement. —J. I. Packer, _A Passion for Faithfulness: Wisdom

from the Book of Nehemiah_ (Wheaton: Crossway, 1995), 207–209. (Packer says that he would like to see Kent and Barbara Hughes’ book, _Liberating Ministry from the Success Syndrome_, “made

required reading for every pastoral aspirant.”)