When julia talks, does her gender speak louder?

Theconversation

When julia talks, does her gender speak louder?"


Play all audios:

Loading...

How does gender affect the way people perceive Julia Gillard’s communication style? Australians’ responses to Julia Gillard seem complex and ambiguous, embodying the contradictions involved


in how women are expected to communicate compared with what is expected of leaders. Reaction to Gillard’s communication style also appears to be divided along gender lines, with males being


concerned about her accent, and females commenting on her relative “detachment”. Attitudes like this to Gillard may expose some lingering cultural insecurities on the part of Australians.


Different types of Australian accent have been shown to encode different values to listeners. When Australians were asked to evaluate Australian voices with a range of accents - termed


cultivated, general and broad - it was found males with broad Australian accents were rated as reliable, strong and trustworthy, while women with broad Australian accents were rated as


uneducated and unlikely to be in professional positions. The different values associated with male and female Australian accents may explain why Bob Hawke might have been seen as a larrikin,


but still a good bloke, while Julia Gillard’s accent causes some embarrassed responses. When I asked people informally what they thought of Julia Gillard’s communication style, some young


males commented that Julia’s accent reduced her credibility as a leader on the world stage. The complexity of reactions is apparent: while some young men were uncomfortable with Gillard


representing Australia to the world, others said that is good to have a Prime Minister who speaks “like us”; and that “rural and regional Australians can relate to her, she talks like them”.


It seems gender is highly relevant to people’s perception of Gillard’s accent, with negative attributes attached to her broader Australian speech, at least by males. An arguably more


significant factor is that women’s talk typically encodes meanings of care, nurturing and support for the other, while meanings associated with competition, directness and individualism are


typical of men’s talk. Since males have traditionally occupied positions of institutionalised leadership and power, successful communication in these positions has become associated with


directness and confrontation. The paradox for women in leadership positions is the implied need to communicate both care and competition. Julia Gillard faces the “damned if you do, damned if


you don’t” dilemma: if she is forceful and direct she is too aggressive, if she’s indirect, she’s weak and indecisive. These gendered expectations of talk were highlighted at the time of


the Queensland floods, when Anna Bligh and Julia Gillard appeared in televised interviews. Anna Bligh successfully conveyed high level of competence as a leader as well as being empathetic,


caring, showing emotion and sharing personal experiences. Some women that I have talked to say that by contrast Julia Gillard appeared detached and cool. Perhaps, in the same way as an


assertive woman may be referred to as aggressive, calm professionalism in a woman can be interpreted as a lack of engagement or involvement. In unscripted, informal moments Julia exhibits


markers that are expected of female communication: shared laughter and nurturing. She smiles, laughs, and touches Wayne Swan and Mark Latham with a caring, calming hand. The complexities are


revealed again, however, by the fact that some media interpretations were that the touches were displays of her power. It appears that the gender of the audience is a relevant factor. Women


seem more concerned with the lack of expressions of care and nurturing in Gillard’s communication style, while men seem more concerned with accent. And while some people approved of a


leader who “sounds like us”, one 20-year-old male said “Bogan chicks don’t sound intelligent”. Perhaps it is a case of residual cultural cringe: we like the idea that our Prime Minister is a


‘ranga’ who speaks like an ordinary Australian, but at the same time we’re a little embarrassed.


Trending News

Emmerdale's robert sugden's return was teased for months with code name

Viewers of Emmerdale were left gobsmacked tonight as Robert Sugden made an unexpected return to the village just as Aaro...

Emmerdale fans 'work out' second sugden return as robert halts aaron's wedding

Emmerdale star Ryan Hawley has officially reprised his role as Robert Sugden after a six-year absence from the ITV soap ...

Who is robert sugden and why did he leave emmerdale

Emmerdale fans were left delighted on Wednesday night as Robert Sugden made an incredible comeback after six years. Duri...

Emmerdale first look sees robert sugden's real reason for return unveiled

Emmerdale has revealed Robert Sugden's real reason to return in an explosive first look. On Wednesday night, just a...

Leicestershire's probation service rated 'inadequate'

Leicestershire's probation service has been rated 'inadequate' for the second time in three years. Inspec...

Latests News

When julia talks, does her gender speak louder?

How does gender affect the way people perceive Julia Gillard’s communication style? Australians’ responses to Julia Gill...

Ozark quiz questions and answers: 15 questions for your virtual quiz

Ozark is on Netflix now and fans are already looking forward to season four. The series stars Jason Bateman as Marty Byr...

我考取cfa esg 和garp scr專業資格的親身經歷(附考試技巧)

我在2022年考取了CFA ESG EDITION 3考試(2021年10月版)和GARP SCR考試,並拿到了有關ESG專業資格。在此,我會和大家說說我考取對這兩個證書的個人親身經歷,也分享一下考試心得。 > 如果你仍在掙扎要考哪一...

The page you were looking for doesn't exist.

You may have mistyped the address or the page may have moved.By proceeding, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and our ...

Serves all, with a side of chutney

_Idlis,/ plump and spongy lenses,/ magnify our appetites; / and, through the telescope of shared hope,/ bring the stars ...

Top