What meeting your spouse online has in common with arranged marriage

Theconversation

What meeting your spouse online has in common with arranged marriage"


Play all audios:

Loading...

Most Americans who get married today believe they are choosing their own partners after falling in love with them. Arranged marriages, which remain common in some parts of the world, are a


rarity here. But while doing research about arranged marriages, I’ve made a surprising observation: These seemingly different kinds of matrimony may be beginning to converge. Couples who


ostensibly marry after spontaneously falling in love increasingly do that with some help from online dating services or after meeting through hookup apps. And modern arranged marriages –


including my own – are becoming more like love marriages. GOING STRONG IN INDIA According to some estimates, more than half of the marriages taking place around the world each year are


arranged. They are the norm in India, comprising at least 90 percent of all marriages. The practice also remains relatively common elsewhere in South Asia, parts of Africa, the Middle East


and East Asian countries like Japan and China. I believe that most people in communities where arranged marriages predominate still feel that parents and other close relatives are qualified


to select marriage partners. Some young Indians consider their parents as more objective than they are about this big decision and more adept at spotting compatibility. In addition, arranged


marriages help couples uphold cultural and religious traditions that have stood the test of time. Perhaps this explains why people in arranged marriages tend to get divorced less


frequently. Data comparing divorce rates within countries for arranged and love marriage are hard to come by. But in the U.S., between 40 and 50 percent of all marriages end in divorce. In


India, the divorce rate for all marriages is about 1 percent and it’s higher for love marriages than arranged ones there. To be sure, divorce is often frowned upon in nations and cultures


where arranged marriages are common – making that metric a potentially unreliable way to assess marital bliss or the lack thereof. In addition, the U.S., Indian and other governments


generally don’t collect arranged marriage data. NOT YOUR GRANDMA’S ARRANGED MARRIAGE As a result of India’s rising incomes, higher education levels and technological advances that ease


communications, arranged marriage is changing there and among people of Indian heritage who live elsewhere. Young people who tie the knot that way have more power to choose their spouses and


can even initiate the process instead of their parents. In addition, the prevalence of matrimonial websites such as Shaadi (which means marriage in Hindi) and Jeevansathi (life partner in


Hindi) empower young Indians who reside in India or North America to become more self-reliant. The internet, higher education levels, and cultural and economic globalization are also making


single Indians freer to do their own searching for future spouses than their parents were. And some traditions that limit choices for single people, such as parents placing newspaper ads to


announce eligibility and interest, are becoming less common. Finally, when Indians reach a marriageable age – usually between 18 and 30 years old for women and between 22 and 40 for men –


the ways these aspiring brides and grooms interact are beginning to resemble contemporary dating in the U.S. That’s a big change from the rituals of the past, which typically involved a


supervised meeting between the prospective bride and the groom and several meetings between their families. ARRANGED MARRIAGE, AMERICAN-STYLE Arranged marriage is stigmatized in the U.S.,


where parents are largely deemed ill-suited for the task of finding marriage partners for their children. But, in my opinion, things are changing here for a reason. Online dating and


matrimonial sites, such as eHarmony, OkCupid and The Right Stuff are proliferating and becoming more accepted. While these sites and apps don’t use the word “arranged” in their branding,


it’s hard to deny that they do “arrange” for people to meet. In addition, the explicit criteria – online profiles, personality tests, questionnaires – that they use to match individuals


resemble the implicit criteria parents and friends use to identify prospective spouses for arranged marriages. An important difference is that third parties – dating websites and other


matchmaking services or their staff – handle the “arranging” activities. EHarmony, for example, pre-screens candidates based on personality tests. OkCupid uses questionnaires to match


people. Perfectmatch.com uses algorithms to match people, and The Right Stuff pairs people by profile. Psychologist John Cacioppo of the University of Chicago recently did a study with


several colleagues about internet dating and modern matrimony. They found that more than one-third of all American couples who got married between 2005 and 2012 met online. Marriages that


began when couples met online were a little less likely to break up than those who didn’t and those spouses were somewhat more satisfied with their marriages, the researchers determined. In


my view, all parents seeking to arrange a marriage for their sons and daughters do so with the best of intentions. They don’t always get it right, but they frequently do. My own parents


certainly did, 23 years ago, when I got married. And whether parents or computer algorithms make this connection, the ultimate goal is the same: to ensure a happy and long-lasting union.


Trending News

Charles' sad wish as he spends another christmas not seeing archie and lilibet

KING CHARLES AND HIS ESTRANGED SON PRINCE HARRY MAY BE THOUSANDS OF MILES APART THIS CHRISTMAS, BUT THE MONARCH IS STILL...

Ferroelectric polarization switching with a remarkably high activation energy in orthorhombic gafeo3 thin films

ABSTRACT Orthorhombic GaFeO3 (_o_-GFO) with the polar _Pna_21 space group is a prominent ferrite owing to its piezoelect...

Whose side was she on? 'american heiress' revisits patty hearst's kidnapping

In February of 1974, Patty Hearst, the 19-year-old granddaughter of the wealthy newspaper publisher William Randolph Hea...

Is the tory party lost in space? | thearticle

_My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;_ _Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!_ _Nothing beside remains. Round the d...

Molecular dynamics simulations on rorγt: insights into its functional agonism and inverse agonism

ABSTRACT The retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor (ROR) γt receptor is a member of nuclear receptors, which is...

Latests News

What meeting your spouse online has in common with arranged marriage

Most Americans who get married today believe they are choosing their own partners after falling in love with them. Arran...

Cryo-em structures of inactive and active gabab receptor

ABSTRACT Metabotropic GABAB G protein-coupled receptor functions as a mandatory heterodimer of GB1 and GB2 subunits and ...

If you want to recruit unpaid sperm donors then play into masculine stereotypes | thearticle

With an increasing number of people relying on sperm donation to have babies – from lesbian couples to heterosexual ones...

CNRS gold awards | Nature

Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ...

Technology must be used for development, not destruction: modi

Dubai, Feb 11 (IANS) Technology must be used only for development and raising the standard of life of the common man and...

Top