Undervalued, underfunded, undermined … how science fared in the budget
Undervalued, underfunded, undermined … how science fared in the budget"
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
The post-budget political rhetoric to me reinforces the underlying, ongoing, disdain that this, and indeed many previous, governments have for science-related matters in Australia. Minister
Carr is reported as saying that finding the “record” $3 billion to keep CSIRO going for the next four years “wasn’t easy”. While I applaud him for fighting the good fight to secure this
cash, I’m still left feeling bewildered that a fight was even necessary. How is it that we are still in a world (and in Australia’s case, an economy) where funding enterprises such as CSIRO
are even slightly tricky to sell to our lords and mistresses? Mr Carr himself speaks of how CSIRO gives Australia a competitive edge, and how 150 companies have been directly arisen from
CSIRO research. The line is being trotted out by certain media outlets that the funding represents a “big splurge for science” is cause for great disappointment. It’s as if science spending
should somehow be considered reckless, as if it’s showing favouritism to niche interest groups as opposed to investing in our collective futures on myriad fronts. Other causes for
disillusionment abound. Apparently, roughly $9 million will be allocated for the decommissioning of two nuclear facilities in NSW (at Lucas Heights and Camperdown). News like this leaves me
with the impression that we are supposed to be grateful for the spend. Seriously? Surely the decommissioning of an ageing nuclear facility is an absolute no-brainer – it’s not in any way an
indicator of even noteworthy (better yet impressive) budgeting. The government’s new initiative on science communication, Inspiring Australia, did in fact receive the money it was promised:
$21 million over three years. For this, we in the science communication community can say thanks. But some $13 to $14 million was already committed under the auspices of a recently closed
program called SCOPE, so we are looking at just $6 to 7 million of new money. Over three years. Across the whole of the country. For all the sciences … Still, nothing grieves me more than
the ongoing NHMRC funding discourse. The maintenance, and indeed marginal increase, in funding over the next few years is in no way a cause for celebration. For starters, this convinces me
even more that the pre-budget rumours of a $400 million cut were almost certainly a stunt. Threaten to take away what we have, magnanimously offer it back to us later, and pause for
gratitude and devotion. Minister Carr was quoted yesterday as saying the high-profile protests beforehand were misplaced. Why? Because the cuts were never going to happen? Because medical
research isn’t that important? Because protesting is just “not cricket”? I assume in the post-budget wrap-up it really means: “See, there was nothing to worry about, we even gave you a tidgy
bit more.” Yep, 4%. Barely above CPI. And for medical research. While it would be churlish to suggest the budget is a bad result for science, it would be naïve, even sycophantic, to say
it’s a good one. I personally dream of the day when money directed to science-based research and development is seen as investing, rather than spending. Ain’t it nice to dream … As a
country, we continue to undervalue, underfund, indeed undermine science when compared to relevant OECD partners. But at least we aren’t doing this any more than before. For the sciences,
it’s budget as usual.
Trending News
Young australians champion ‘democracy’ and ‘freedom’ in designing constitutional changeWhen the Australian constitution was written in the 1890s, the authors did not envision an independent nation, but a sel...
Labour's anneliese dodds grilled by bbc host as she slams rishi sunakSpeaking on BBC Newsnight, the Labour frontbencher claimed Chancellor Rishi Sunak's economic plan fails to be a &qu...
Sleep disorders center | veterans affairsOur Sleep Disorders Center, located at 2271 Deerfield Lane, Helena, Montana, offers a comprehensive suite of sleep servi...
For the record - jan. 18, 2009Prince: In an article last Sunday about Prince, the title of his upcoming album, “Lotusflow3r,” was given as “Lotus Flow...
Global money market funds see huge demand for a seventh straight weekGlobal money market funds see huge demand for a seventh straight week | WTVB | 1590 AM · 95.5 FM | The Voice of Branch C...
Latests News
Undervalued, underfunded, undermined … how science fared in the budgetThe post-budget political rhetoric to me reinforces the underlying, ongoing, disdain that this, and indeed many previous...
'much will go wrong' - elon musk on space internet launchMr Musk tweeted: “More details on day of launch, currently tracking to Wednesday, 6 more launches of 60 sats needed for ...
Critical regulation of cd4+ t cell survival and autoimmunity by β-arrestin 1ABSTRACT CD4+ T cells are important in adaptive immunity, but their dysregulation can cause autoimmunity. Here we demons...
Ronan keating says wife is 'reason i keep going' in emotional tributeRonan Keating marked a milestone with wife Storm as they celebrated their ninth wedding anniversary on August 17 and the...
Flu shot now available for southern nevada veterans | va southern nevada health care | veterans affairsLas Vegas , NV — As the flu season approaches, VA Southern Nevada Healthcare System is encouraging all Veterans to get t...