Uk drug policy: how seizing passports will not stop illicit dug use
Uk drug policy: how seizing passports will not stop illicit dug use"
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
In an attempt to clamp down on recreational drug use, the British government recently set out a three-tier system for dealing with people caught in possession of illegal substances. A scale
of punishments would be introduced for those caught in possession once, twice or three times. These would begin with a fine and culminate in a variety of deeply punitive options such as
tagging offenders, suspending their driving licence and even confiscating their passport. All this is being promoted as part of a government plan, entitled Swift, Certain, Tough: new
consequences for drug possession, which aims to bring overall drug use down to “a historic 30-year low” by “delivering a generational shift in demand”. Other nations, including the US,
Jamaica and Thailand are modernising their drug policies and moving away from criminalisation. The UK, meanwhile, seems determined to disregard the evidence that has for decades contradicted
the idea that ever-tougher responses are needed. Research has long shown that punitive measures are not a deterrent. Further, most illegal drug use is recreational, more commonly associated
with leisure and pleasure than criminality. Research shows that recreational drug use rarely leads to addiction or requires treatment. The government seems far from understanding this, as
is evident when it calls drugs the “root of untold harm and misery across our society” in its reform proposals. It is questionable whether this reductionist discourse applies to any drug
user – there are, for example, functioning heroin addicts who live normal productive lives – let alone recreational drugs and their users. Evidence shows criminalising otherwise law-abiding
citizens for their drug use does not deter them from doing it. In fact, it merely serves to damage their life chances We know that a conviction makes it harder for people (and particularly
young people) to find housing, get a job and travel. It also makes them more likely to continue offending. All this should make the government think long and hard about which offences
therefore justify serious punishment. PUNITIVE MEASURES ARE DISCRIMINATORY IN PRACTICE Drug laws and their punishments are not applied equitably and tend to discriminate along the lines of
class, and gender, as we have already seen with cannabis warnings. Cannabis warnings are issued by the police for those found in possession of a small amount of cannabis and operate as the
first stage of a similar three-tiered escalation system implemented to deal with cannabis use. And when it comes to race, they discriminate too. In London, black people, often from deprived
areas, receive cannabis warnings at three times the rate of white people. Law enforcement measures are being used to deter recreational drug use, while more harmful substances such as
alcohol, tobacco and sugar remain legal and socially acceptable. This, despite the research being clear on how such substances cause more harm than many of their illicit counterparts. A
truly evidence-based approach to drugs would look very different. The proposed new “three-tier” approach may appear to be a reform but the reality is that while the government’s proposed
punishments for first and second offences may appear to err towards decriminalisation, the punishments for third offences – tagging offenders, suspending their driving licences and
confiscating their passports – are extreme. Ultimately, this remains a law enforcement approach that has already been shown to be ineffective. It will not bring overall drug use down. It
will, however, undoubtedly cause untold harm to thousands of people. Instead of focusing on low-level possession of recreational drugs, we need realistic, effective, evidence-based ways to
reduce the harms of drugs, in terms of use and supply. We also need to support those drug users who want support, rather than inflicting punishments that will disproportionately criminalise
certain groups of users.
Trending News
Boris johnson’s brexit tax cuts plea rejected by theresa mayIncome tax, stamp duty and capital gains tax should all be reduced without rises in other levies, Mr Johnson said. His c...
How to sell your home to foreignersWHETHER it is a country house or a town flat, a property that has huge appeal to a Briton might not appeal at all to a F...
Download the lab’s iphone app[embedded content]The world of journalism is changing faster than ever. Want to keep on top of every new business model,...
Premier league: latest news, news articles, photos, videos - newsbytesManchester City have completed the signing of Dutch midfielder Tijjani Reijnders from AC Milan for a fee of £46.3 millio...
Government has 'absolutely no plans' to scrap free bus passThe UK Government has "absolutely no plans to withdraw the concessionary bus pass scheme" for those over State...
Latests News
Uk drug policy: how seizing passports will not stop illicit dug useIn an attempt to clamp down on recreational drug use, the British government recently set out a three-tier system for de...
Prime minister narendra modi seeks a smooth parliament sessionPresides over an all-party meet, urges all members to deliver on the people's expectation from both Houses Prime Mi...
‘wise to assume bird flu pandemic will cause more severe disease in humans than covid-19’H5N1, or bird flu, has been perceived as a potential public health threat for at least 20 years now, since the virus inf...
Breast fed children enjoy reduced risk of diabetesThey studied 334,553 deliveries during the 24-year period in Manitoba province involving 60,088 FN births and 274,465 no...
How bmw aims to outsell other luxury makesLudwig Willisch took over as president of BMW of North America at a fortuitous time. The German native joined the compan...