Six reasons britain’s impending voter id law is a bad idea

Theconversation

Six reasons britain’s impending voter id law is a bad idea"


Play all audios:

Loading...

Under new government rules, voters across Great Britain will be required to show photographic identification before being given their ballot paper at many elections. (Northern Ireland


already requires voters to provide photographic ID.) But not everyone thinks this is a good idea. Two cross-party parliamentary committees – one on human rights and another on constitutional


affairs – have raised serious concerns. The Scottish and Welsh governments don’t think that voter identification is necessary (and so it will not be required for local elections in Scotland


and Wales or Scottish and Welsh government elections). Campaigners have called it voter suppression. Electoral administrators have called for the change to be postponed rather than


introduced at the local elections in May 2023. Voter identification is used in many other countries but in Britain, where there is no universal national form of identification already


provided, the weight of evidence is against pushing ahead. There are at least six problems with photographic id. 1. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF VOTER FRAUD The government claims that voter ID is


needed to prevent fraud – that is, someone casting another’s vote at a polling station. But this is exceptionally rare. Research that I undertook with Newcastle University’s Alistair Clark


involving a survey of over 5,000 poll workers found that only 0.7% suspected electoral fraud in the polling station in which they worked. And where there was wrongdoing, this was often


inadvertent. Data on convictions and allegations made to the authorities points in the same direction. The general election in 2019 saw millions of votes cast, but just one police caution


for using someone else’s vote. Impersonation is rare because it is not a good strategy for election rigging. There is a high chance that you would be caught. Someone in the polling station


may know the real person on the register, and records are kept of who has voted. One or two votes are also very unlikely to change the result of any election. So why try? 2. PHOTOGRAPHIC


VOTER ID COULD DENY LEGITIMATE VOTERS More worryingly, voter identification requirements lead to eligible citizens not casting their vote. It is difficult to calculate how many, but the


voter ID pilots show that most poll workers encountered people who could not vote as they did not have ID. When photographic identification requirements were first introduced in Northern


Ireland, it was estimated that 2.3% of the electorate were refused a vote for not presenting the required identification. The government’s own research found that 4% of Great Britain’s


population did not have photographic identification in which they were recognisable. That would mean that approximately 1.9 million people who are currently eligible to vote being excluded


from elections. 3. PHOTO ID DISCRIMINATES The burden of having to actively take steps to comply with new rules is going to fall unevenly across the population because some groups are more


likely to have access than others. The decisions made about which forms of identification will be admissible at polling stations also seem to favour older voters over younger voters. Those


over 60 years old can use their travel passes as ID but, for example, while younger would-be voters can’t. This gives the strong impression that accepted forms of identification have been


politically chosen. 4. VOTER IDENTIFICATION IS EXPENSIVE Introducing voter identification requirements will cost millions. Government estimates show that funding will be needed for training


and communications on top of all the basic costs associated with the new rules. Overall, the cost is estimated to be up to £180,000,000 over a decade. This is in the midst of a cost of


living crisis with inflationary pressures being felt by households and businesses, and government departments being asked to find efficiency savings. Voter identification seems to be one


obvious saving. 5. THE CHANGE IS HAPPENING AT TOO SHORT NOTICE A golden rule for running elections is not to introduce late legislation. There is a risk that doing so can create unnecessary


administrative problems and confusion. International best practice on elections prescribes that there should not be rule changes one year before an election. Following a fiasco during the


2007 Scottish elections where counts were suspended and 140,000 ballot papers were rejected because of late changes, electoral organisations in the UK believe changes shouldn’t happen fewer


than six months before an election. The government appears to be repeating the same mistakes ahead of the May 2023 local elections. Electoral officials have issued crystal clear warning that


there is insufficient time to implement without problems. 6. OTHER PROBLEMS NEED FIXING Perhaps most importantly, there are other areas of elections where improvements could be made. The


voter experience could be improved by making voter registration automatic, so that citizens didn’t have to do anything to be registered. Our research shows that the biggest problem in


polling stations is unregistered voters. Election law needs to be rewritten and simplified. There needs to be a complaints process for citizens who experience real problems. Unfortunately,


focusing on the red herring of voter fraud is crowding out efforts to address important problems. A WAY FORWARD? There are other options and compromises that could be reached with voter


identification. Expanding the rules to include non-photographic ID would be much less discriminatory, for a start. As evidence that I gave to parliament set out, another option would be to


follow a Canadian style vouching system. Following similarly heated debates about voter ID, Canada allows a citizen who has ID and appears on the electoral roll to sign an affidavit


confirming the identity of another voter who does not have identification. This provides a clear paper trail linked to registered voters so that any suspicions of irregularities can be


investigated. It also ensures that many citizens without identification, or those who feel uncomfortable providing it, can still cast their vote. Family, friends and neighbours can help one


another to participate. As it stands, photographic identification stands to do nothing to improve elections, but a lot to undermine them.


Trending News

Tirong Aboh killing: NIA announces cash reward for information on wanted NSCN (IM) members

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) on Friday announced a cash reward for two wanted accused, belonging to the NSCN-...

Cbtm06020 - responsibility for a child or qualifying young person: meaning of 'living with' the claimant - hmrc internal manual

CBTM06020 - RESPONSIBILITY FOR A CHILD OR QUALIFYING YOUNG PERSON: MEANING OF 'LIVING WITH' THE CLAIMANT R(F)2...

District 181 signs up for educator exchange program with south african schools

Hinsdale-Clarendon Hills Elementary District 181 has decided to become involved with the Langa Education Assistance Prog...

Let the Games Begin - Los Angeles Times

Athletes from the region competing in the Maccabi Games, Sunday through Aug. 23 in West Bloomfield, Mich., include: BASE...

Hockey - Los Angeles Times

Edmonton Oiler owner Peter Pocklington paid his team $100,000 to win series-clinching sixth game of the Smythe Division ...

Latests News

Six reasons britain’s impending voter id law is a bad idea

Under new government rules, voters across Great Britain will be required to show photographic identification before bein...

Snaptrude gets vc backing to take on autodesk in building design space | techcrunch

Snaptrude, a young startup, is attempting to disrupt Autodesk in the building design space, giving customers modern and ...

Pak completes formalities for an Interpol RCN against Mush

The FIA has sent a reply to Interpol along with the order in which an anti-terrorism court had declared Musharraf a "pro...

Actress amanda redman: tv bosses don’t seem to find people of my decad

She’s one of Britain’s most popular TV actresses, known for her starring roles in a succession of hit dramas – most nota...

Gino d'acampo: family fortunes contestant snaps 'it's your accent'

It comes as Gino has recently began to host the newly rebooted Family Fortunes on ITV. He admitted that before taking on...

Top