Factcheck: do 679 of australia’s biggest corporations pay ‘not one cent’ of tax?

> … 679 of our biggest corporations pay not one cent of tax. – > AUSTRALIAN COUNCIL OF TRADE UNIONS (ACTU) SECRETARY SALLY MCMANUS, > ADDRESS TO THE NATIONAL PRESS CLUB, CANBERRA, 

MARCH 29, 2017. Speaking at the National Press Club in Canberra, Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) Secretary Sally McManus called for an increase to Australia’s minimum wage and

criticised the Fair Work Commission’s recommendation to cut Sunday and public holiday penalty rates. McManus said that “679 of our biggest corporations pay not one cent of tax”. Was that

claim correct? CHECKING THE SOURCE When asked for sources to support McManus’ statement, a spokesman for the ACTU pointed The Conversation to a media report and to the Australian Taxation

Office (ATO) Report of Entity Tax Information for 2014-15, and provided this response from McManus: > According to the most recent ATO Tax Transparency Report, 679 > companies with 

more than $100 million in income paid no tax in > Australia in 2014-15. >  > The list includes such household names as Walt Disney, Sydney > Airport, Qantas, Origin Energy and 

News Australia. >  > These companies can collectively be considered to be amongst the > biggest operating in Australia – both in terms of income, and the > prominent position 

they enjoy in the public eye. >  > Some of them are not Australian owned, and they may pay tax in other > jurisdictions. However, they all operate in Australia, generate > 

revenue from the spending of Australians and utilise existing > infrastructure – like roads and ports – that were paid for by > Australians. >  > So there’s something deeply 

unfair about a system which allows > them to not pay any tax in Australia. The ACTU also provided The Conversation with a spreadsheet listing the corporations it said had paid no tax. IS

THAT FIGURE RIGHT? The best source for information on how much tax Australia’s biggest corporations pay every financial year is the ATO. The ATO’s Report of Entity Tax Information – the same

report the ACTU referred to in their response – is produced annually and shares information taken from the tax returns of: * Australian public and foreign-owned corporate entities with

total income of A$100 million or more * Australian-owned resident private companies with total income of A$200 million or more * entities with tax payable under the petroleum resource rent

tax, and * entities with tax payable under the minerals resource rent tax. The report includes each company’s name, total income, taxable income, and tax payable. For the purpose of this

FactCheck, the relevant information is the _tax payable_ by each of these companies. By looking at this data, we can see which companies didn’t pay tax in 2014-15, the most recent financial

year for which this information is available. HOW MANY COMPANIES DON’T PAY TAX? There are 1,904 companies included in the ATO’s 2014-15 report. Of those, 678 – or 36% of the companies listed

– had no tax payable. My count – 678 – is slightly different to McManus’s count of 679, and to the figure the ATO quoted on its pie chart here (the ATO has since corrected its report to

reduce the number of nil tax payable taxpayers by one to 678). The ACTU provided The Conversation with a spreadsheet listing the 679 companies that, in their view, paid no taxes. When I

compared my count with the ACTU’s, I noted the ACTU included a company that I did not, a company named Tal Dai-Ichi Life Australia. In the report I downloaded from the ATO website, Tal

Dai-Ichi Life Australia is recorded as having total tax payable of A$56,171,148 for the 2014-15 financial year, so it shouldn’t be included in the count of companies that paid no tax.

Nevertheless, the difference is obviously minor. McManus was essentially correct. WHY DO SOME COMPANIES PAY NO TAX? In general, there are two reasons why corporate companies pay no tax in

Australia. The first is that some companies are not making any profit. The concept of “total income”, which is used to identify the companies included in the ATO report, relates to revenue –

not profit. So, a company can have income (or revenue) of more than A$200 million, but that doesn’t automatically mean it has made a profit. Its losses or outgoings may outweigh its income.

Only companies making a profit have to pay taxes. Many of the companies that didn’t pay tax in 2014-15 were those in the energy/natural resources and manufacturing sectors – two sectors

that were experiencing a downturn in that year and where profit margins were shrinking. The second reason could be tax avoidance or profit shifting. These situations arise when companies

take advantage of the international tax system to reduce the amount of tax to be paid. For instance, companies may set up complex ownership arrangements that allow them to redirect profit to

countries with lower tax rates. While not necessarily illegal, these situations are closely monitored by the ATO to ensure that Australia receives its correct share of tax under

international tax rules. VERDICT Sally McManus’ claim that “679 of our biggest corporations pay not one cent of tax” was essentially correct. According to ATO records, 678 of Australia’s

biggest corporations didn’t pay tax in Australia in 2014-15. McManus’s figure of 679 included one company that did have tax payable in that financial year. But in percentage terms, the

difference between 678 and 679 is negligible. It’s important to note that when a company doesn’t pay tax, it doesn’t necessarily imply tax avoidance or profit shifting. A company might not

be paying tax because it isn’t making a profit, even if its total income (that is, revenue) amounts to more than A$100 million or A$200 million. – FABRIZIO CARMIGNANI

------------------------- This is a sound FactCheck. The ATO’s annual corporate tax transparency reports can provide useful insights to inform public debate regarding how effectively our tax

system is working. As the author rightly points out, the information must be used with caution. There are legitimate reasons why a company with substantial income does not have to pay

income tax. For instance, it may make a loss in that particular year, or has substantial carried forward losses from previous years. Or, as the author has also rightly noted, tax avoidance

may be the reason why a large company is not paying any income tax. – ANTONY TING ------------------------- _The Conversation’s FactCheck unit is the first fact-checking team in Australia

and one of the first worldwide to be accredited by the International Fact-Checking Network, an alliance of fact-checkers hosted at the Poynter Institute in the US. Read more here._ _Have you

seen a “fact” worth checking? The Conversation’s FactCheck asks academic experts to test claims and see how true they are. We then ask a second academic to review an anonymous copy of the

article. You can request a check at [email protected]. Please include the statement you would like us to check, the date it was made, and a link if possible._