The revenge of dominic cummings | thearticle

The spectacle of Dominic Cummings’ marathon session in Parliament yesterday resembled a high-stakes bearpit, much to the bitter pleasure of all those only too keen to draw out the most

withering lines about the Prime Minister and his coterie. As the accusations piled up, and the ministerial failings, institutional incompetence and dithering and ineptitude were unveiled, it

was hard not to wonder whether much of it really would stick to the notoriously unadhesive Johnson administration. From the man who coined the slogan, this was Cummings’ attempt to take

back control. From whom is clear. Though for what reason, is, as ever with such a man, mysterious.  Cummings’ wrath has previously been subject to the tedious press coverage he yesterday

scorned. Yet its importance must be noted; it was with his anger at the Westminster system that the Brexit campaign was saved, it was with his dogmatic iconoclasm that Johnson was able to

get hold of the election victory and Brexit victory he wanted, and it was while grappling with his heady notions of Whitehall shake-ups that the whole system was so fluked by the incoming

pandemic last year. What remains most remarkable about this recent episode is the ease with which he is prepared to defy his former master in the most public of terms, and the flippancy in

which he insults the very people who a year ago were to be the new political masters of Britain.  And insult he certainly did. Matt Hancock, for many the face of perpetual pandemic doom _par

excellence_, was accused of “criminal” behaviour, guilty of “lying to everybody on multiple occasions” throughout the whole crisis. Much of this is centred on the initial fiasco of the test

and trace system; in order to meet his publicised daily target of 100,000 tests, Hancock was willing to create a system which would “hold tests back” in order to let himself take the credit

for meeting the target in his TV addresses. Cummings’ plan, to create a more medium-term system to process more tests, was ignored. It was a piece of expediency which caused “serious harm”.

Whether it will do anything of the same to Hancock’s political ambitions, given the litany of recent scandals, remains to be seen.  That Cummings so vociferously targeted Hancock subtly

hides Johnson from his ire. There was less vitriol towards the Prime Minister; merely the solemn insistence that he was “unfit” for office. That this comes from a man not long ago touted as

the holder of the real reins of authority in Downing Street should not be forgotten: but it certainly hides Johnson from the headline attacks. And it cannot be repeated enough: not only can

our Prime Minister apparently evade every scandal, he can more often than not use them to his advantage. This Cummings realised, and employed devastatingly when they worked together. Now

apart, it seems hard that any mounting pile of invective from outside will be able to hit enough punches to bring the leader down.  Beyond the immediate Westminster hubbub, the only thing

likely to be gleaned from this episode is the premonition of the national inquiry to come. Cummings may be attempting to shield himself from the waves of anger when his role is critiqued in

full, while figures such as Hancock may just be beginning to dread the full scale of retribution when the truth is uncovered. Indeed, it was apparently the Prime Minister’s solution to keep

Hancock in place until the inquiry, for him to then be sacked to provide a political shield. Such ministerial fodder may easily become garments in Johnson’s armoury as he manages to evade

responsibility, another of his most potent abilities. Cummings may well become yet another casualty of such petard-hoisting, and Hancock seems destined to be the next accused of letting the

side down. The Cabinet was stuffed full of yes-men at the worst possible time, and even Cummings’ insistence on total loyalty could not bear the “failures” all around him. How far all who

remain are prepared to go protect their boss may define the next years of an increasingly streaky administration.  Cummings’ ambition in government was to change it beyond previous

recognition. He knows that in this he failed; not even he could force the mandarins out in his short time at the helm. That he is now defending himself so vigorously from the failures of

others may be simply a characteristic bluntness. It also manages to hide one man from the responsibility which ultimately lies at his door, and Boris Johnson wouldn’t take responsibility if

it came with the offer of a free divorce lawyer and the freedom of the city of Liverpool.  Speaking of the Johnson Government as a mafia does not really suffice, given that it would be an

incredibly dysfunctional mafioso who refused to get rid of Priti Patel and Robert Jenrick, while letting his former _consigliere_ break an _omert__à_ so easily. Yet Johnson still gets a

ludicrously high polling rating for a leader whose record of governance this last year would lead one to predict anything but. He is also blessed with a void for an opposition: Starmer’s

rival gang is as threatening to their territory as a drunken police officer in Thirties Chicago. If the Cummings fiasco reveals much more than the hearty bucketful of Westminster gossip, it

should serve to remind us of such a void which lies at the heart of government, a Government led by a man seemingly able to escape any scandal under the perpetual guise of being a leader in

crisis. Hindsight’s a wonderful thing, we’ve been reminded over the past year, as well as scolded in daring to think that anyone else would really be able to do a better job. Dominic

Cummings told us yesterday that indeed many could easily have done. To take his sermons as truth would be foolhardy. But perhaps not as mistaken as to trust our Prime Minister in many more

of the words which come out of his mouth.  Britain is not a one-party state; to describe it as such is facetious enough to dismiss the real grasps of authoritarianism which are sweeping over

much of Europe, and which this Government seems so keen to ignore. But the fact that its leader can evade the scrutiny and unrest which would have ruffled not only his party benches but a

less placid electorate only a few years ago deserves notice. Dominic Cummings has, not for the first time, stuck two of his fingers up at the Conservative Government. That he extends the

gesture to almost all of the rest of the political sphere seems irrelevant. But his opponents, Tory or not, should stop and think about what he has said beyond the ridicule and the

vendettas. The country is run by a man without the necessary skills required to tackle this crisis or the next, and the decisions of the nation are taken by lacklustre flatterers behind

closed doors, apparently with more focus on press conference gambits than the fates of its citizens. It all seems rather a long way from taking back control.  A MESSAGE FROM THEARTICLE _We

are the only publication that’s committed to covering every angle. We have an important contribution to make, one that’s needed now more than ever, and we need your help to continue

publishing throughout the pandemic. So please, make a donation._