Mansfield and gaudier: the clash of genius | thearticle

Thearticle

Mansfield and gaudier: the clash of genius | thearticle"


Play all audios:

Loading...

In June 1912 the frail, attractive New Zealand short-story writer Katherine Mansfield and her partner, the English critic John Middleton Murry, met the emotional French artist Henri Gaudier.


  He had sent some impressive drawings to _Rhythm_, the little magazine they were editing, and they asked him to contribute more art.  An exceptionally gifted sculptor, Gaudier had a slender


build, an ascetic-looking face, thin lips and nose, and long dark hair.  He spoke English with a heavy accent and had a great deal of nervous energy.  Emotional and impulsive, he demanded


an intense and absolute friendship, and seemed to be an unmistakable genius.  Like the unmarried Mansfield and Murry, Gaudier was an impoverished artist living with a lover, and had joined


the name of his 19-years-older Polish companion, Sophie Brzeska, to his own. The Gaudier-Brzeskas were real bohemians, while the Murrys were middle-class rebels who hated poverty and still


believed in marriage, family and home.  Gaudier felt they were destined to become intimate, and when they parted after their first meeting the ebullient Frenchman shocked Murry by hugging


and kissing him, which made Mansfield wrongly suspect he might be homosexual.  At the beginning of their careers, these young close contemporaries craved an alliance with congenial spirits,


but their promising relations lasted for only three volatile months and ended tragically.  Mansfield and Gaudier were marked for an early death. At first, Mansfield saw fictional potential


in Sophie and told her, “You fascinate me, I can’t make you out, you interest me tremendously.”  But the reserved Anglo-Saxon was soon repelled by the Slavic intensity of Sophie’s personal


revelations, her litany of woes and tales of harsh treatment by her family, employers and lovers, including lesbians.  Mansfield  felt more pity than affection, disliked her gauche gestures


of friendship, pulled away from Sophie’s physical contact, and feared she would be strangled and sucked dry by Sophie’s tentacles. Imposing on their hospitality, Gaudier had brashly


suggested that they all share, though he could not pay for, the Murrys’ cottage in Runcton near Chichester (80 miles southwest of London).  Mansfield had sentimentally and possessively


called the cottage “our wedding house.”  Emphasizing their therapeutic benefits, Gaudier insisted, “Sophie will live there—it will do her good: and I shall be able to come every week-end.” 


In his autobiography _Between Two Worlds, _Murry recalled that Mansfield was appalled by the threat of their parasitic invasion: “It’s our house,” she moaned, “Our first house.  I can’t bear


the idea of anybody else living there.  They could come at the week-ends and be welcome; but all day and every day—no, it’s too much.” In late August, Sophie pressed on with their plans and


sent Gaudier on a surprise visit to see if the cottage was finished and her room was ready.  Short of money, he walked the last 25 miles from the railroad station.  He arrived unannounced


at the cottage with great plans and expectations, and overheard Mansfield dreading Sophie’s visit and insulting his beloved: Murry: I think she should come down here now, there is plenty of


room.  Just let us speak to Gaudier about it. Mansfield: Oh, no. I don’t want to see her here—she’s too violent [in her emotions]—I won’t have her. Murry: But, Tiger, look here, she’s not


like that—I don’t see why— Mansfield. (violently): Leave me alone, I don’t like her and I don’t want to see her—she’ll make me ill again. In his autobiography Murry desperately tried to


explain and excuse Mansfield’s self-protective but unfortunate outburst: “She had said nothing cruel, and nothing untrue: merely that she was quite sad that the good time of our being


together alone was coming to an end, and that now, with Sophie’s coming, everything was going to be spoiled: that she did not, could not really like Sophie.  She couldn’t make herself like a


person. With Sophie, she never had an impulse to go out towards her, but only to shrink back.  She felt that Sophie wanted to drag her into a morass.” Like an ill-fated character in a


Thomas Hardy novel, the hypersensitive Gaudier was deeply wounded by accidentally hearing this conversation through an open window. He left unseen, and sent a dejected postcard to Sophie


using the Murrys’ nicknames, cursing “les sales tigres” (the dirty tigers) and swearing never to meet them again.  He sent Murry a furious frenchified letter that exposed his raw wounds,


defended Sophie and condemned the “fiendish” Mansfield: “Your acquaintance has been for me one long suffering—not only for me but also for the object of my love, which is twice worse.  I met


you at a dangerous turning, the brains burned by the recent summer, thirsty for good friendship, only with one drawback: poverty.  Being then freshly strong, promising all kinds of things


and favours, you behaved stupidly, thinking I was lashed to you, and that I would not mind any dirt.  I was confirmed into my thought of the wickedness of Katherine Mansfield by a


conversation I overheard when at Runcton.  K.M., with a fiendish jealousy, upheld to the end that Zosik [Sophie] was too violent.”  He had a limited and unhappy sexual life with Sophie,


which ranged from celibacy with her to relief with prostitutes.  As Gaudier’s biographer writes, he felt sorry for the passive and besotted Murry, “who seemed to be entirely in the hands of


Katherine Mansfield, who made love to him all the time, until he was squeezed dry.”  Mansfield similarly felt she’d be “sucked dry” by Sophie. Gaudier then became a persistent and malignant


enemy, mistakenly believing that Mansfield and Murry were making an enormous profit out of _Rhythm_ by exploiting contributors and getting their writing and drawings for nothing.  In fact,


they supported the magazine with their own money, to the tune of 200.  Another Hardyesque misunderstanding occurred when Gaudier ordered Murry to return a French book he had borrowed.  After


moving their household several times, Murry couldn’t find it and sent Gaudier a note with a postal order to pay for the book.  But in his haste he forgot to include the payment.  Before


Murry could resend it, Gaudier unleashed another abusive letter about this cruel deceit, stating that “though I was vile beyond imagination, Katherine was yet worse; and he was sure it was


she who had put me up to this trick.” As French hysteria clashed with English reserve, the deranged Gaudier now sought revenge and actually threatened to kill the timid Murry.  In May 1913,


when Murry was working in the _Rhythm_ office on Chancery Lane, Gaudier  and his friend suddenly rushed into the room: “Now, we’ve got you,” said Gaudier. “So it seems.  What do you want?”


“All sorts of things.  We’ve come to pay you out.” “Very well.  Fire away.” “I should like,” said Gaudier, squeezing his fingers together round an imaginary throat, “to throttle you.  But


you’re not worth murdering.  But you’re going to pay me for the drawings of mine you published.” Terrified at what Gaudier might do to him but pretending to be calm, Murry again denied that


he had promised to pay for the art and reminded Gaudier that he had been very keen to get it published.  Gaudier then tore two drawings from the wall and—as if provoking a duel—slapped the


face of Murry.  He tried to ignore the insult and act as though nothing had happened.  Gaudier exclaimed, “That’s enough—for to-night.  But we’ve only begun,” and rushed away.  After his


narrow escape, Murry immediately wrote to Mansfield in Runcton: “Gaudier has just been.  Of course I am not worth a twopenny damn now.  I’ve been crying out of sheer nervous reaction.  The


old lies shrieked at me & some Gaudier lies & venom.  [Someone should] crush that woman when he sees her—or I shall kill her.  I love you—but suddenly the beast has fouled


everything.” At the height of their excruciating friendship Gaudier had made a portrait head of Murry, which Murry described as a “massive, heroic, hieratic, the head of a sort of brooding


demiurge,” a creator.  In a ritualistic execution, Gaudier and Sophie, expressing her hysterical hatred of Mansfield, threw bricks at the clay statue, destroyed it and excised Murry from


their life.  Gaudier was killed in France during the Great War in June 1915 at the age of 23.  Mansfield died in France of tuberculosis in 1923, aged 34.  Sophie was confined to an English


insane asylum in 1922 and died there three years later. _Jeffrey Meyers published Katherine Mansfield: A Biography (1978, reprinted 2002) and wrote about Gaudier in The Enemy: A Biography of


Wyndham Lewis (1980)._ A MESSAGE FROM THEARTICLE _We are the only publication that’s committed to covering every angle. We have an important contribution to make, one that’s needed now more


than ever, and we need your help to continue publishing throughout these hard economic times. So please, make a donation._


Trending News

Pierre gruneberg, ‘swimming instructor to the stars’ on the french riviera – obituary

Telegraph Obituaries 30 June 2023 1:43pm BST Pierre Gruneberg, who has died aged 92, fled Nazi Germany as a boy and went...

Think twice about borrowing from retirement funds

​If you decide to take a loan instead, the amount will be limited to $50,000 or 50 percent of your vested account balan...

Exams boards in dumbing down row over 'daft' spot the difference histo

Instead, presented with two separate pictures of parliament students can pick up full marks for simple observations, inc...

M mot v iss facility services ltd: 2212308/2023

M MOT V ISS FACILITY SERVICES LTD: 2212308/2023 Employment Tribunal decision. Read the full decision in M Mot v ISS Faci...

The aarp minute: november 28, 2022

Memorial Day Sale! Join AARP for just $11 per year with a 5-year membership Join now and get a FREE gift. Expires 6/4  G...

Latests News

Mansfield and gaudier: the clash of genius | thearticle

In June 1912 the frail, attractive New Zealand short-story writer Katherine Mansfield and her partner, the English criti...

Page not found - Eenadu.net

Contents of eenadu.net are copyright protected.Copy and/or reproduction and/or re-use of contents or any part thereof, w...

Severe droughts reduce river navigability and isolate communities in the brazilian amazon

ABSTRACT The Amazon basin is experiencing severe droughts that are expected to worsen with climate change. Riverine comm...

Bioengineers today emphasize the crucial ingredient dr. Frankenstein forgot – responsibility

Mary Shelley was 20 when she published “Frankenstein” in 1818. Two hundred years on, the book remains thrilling, challen...

It took more than an asteroid to kill dinosaurs

One certainly cannot begrudge James Powell’s desire to sell his new book espousing his views of catastrophic dinosaur ex...

Top