America: the empire that texted itself to death | thearticle
America: the empire that texted itself to death | thearticle"
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
The Trump administration, it seems, has discovered a novel way to declare war—by texting its plans to the Editor-in-Chief of _The Atlantic_. Of all the inboxes in all the world, it had to be
Jeffrey Goldberg’s. That one of the administration’s most vocal media critics ended up with what appears to be a strategic playbook is almost too surreal to parody. It’s not just a security
breach. It’s farce. Texting war plans to a journalist sets a new bar in political stupidity. And that stupidity offers an insight into the very essence of the Trump administration. Because
the content of those texts is more alarming than the leak itself. Beneath the chaos lies something darker: an administration that no longer understands—and therefore cannot uphold—the
post-war order that has underpinned global peace, trade, and prosperity for nearly a century. Take J.D. Vance’s glib complaint that the strike against the Houthi rebels was about “bailing
out the Europeans”. It betrays a staggering ignorance of the system America built, and from which it has benefited more than any other nation on Earth. The strike was intended to protect the
trade route from the Strait of Hormuz, through the Suez canal and into the Mediterranean. This isn’t merely a European lifeline—it’s one of the main arteries of the global economy along
with shipping lanes such as the Malacca Strait and the Panama Canal. Block any of them, and the consequences will ripple from the price of petrol in Nebraska to the cost of cornflakes in
Newark. This isn’t about subsidising the EU. It’s about keeping the global market flowing. This is where history matters. The modern American order—often referred to as _Pax Americana_—was
born not merely from idealism, but from the cold clarity of power, oil, and trade. In February 1945, President Franklin D. Roosevelt met King Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia aboard the USS
_Quincy_, anchored in Egypt’s Great Bitter Lake. It was there that the “Deal of Bitter Lake” was struck: the United States would guarantee Saudi security in exchange for stable access to
oil. Part of that stability in oil supply would be the protection of trade routes – in this context the trade artery in question was the one running from the Strait of Hormuz through to the
Mediterranean through which all those barrels of Saudi oil would flow onto the global market. And that was the _Pax Americana _blue print which was rehashed across the world. Oil would flow
through U.S.-protected trade routes, be priced in U.S. dollars, and underpin global trade—however benevolently—by Washington. But J.D. Vance doesn’t understand that. And that’s genuinely
worrying. Today, it is precisely this vital trade artery ruining from the Strait of Hormuz through to the Mediterranean that Iran — through its Houthi proxies in Yemen — seeks to disrupt.
Yet what U.S. Senator J.D. Vance derides as a “European subsidy” is in fact the very lifeline of global commerce that Roosevelt championed as fundamental to American prosperity in the
post-war era. But J.D. Vance doesn’t understand that. And that’s genuinely worrying. A decade later, the logic of this global artery—protected by America to the exclusion of all others—was
reaffirmed during the Suez Crisis. When Britain, France, and Israel attempted to seize control of the canal, President Eisenhower pulled the plug. He forced Prime Minister Anthony
Eden—Churchill’s anointed successor—to withdraw in humiliation. Eden resigned weeks later. His French counterpart, Guy Mollet, barely survived the fallout. Eisenhower’s message was
unambiguous: the American defence of global trade routes trumped old alliances, national pride, and empire. The United States would uphold the order—even if it meant flattening its own
allies to do so. But J.D. Vance doesn’t understand that. And that’s genuinely worrying. What bound it all together was a bargain: America would police the world’s sea lanes, provide a
security umbrella, and—yes—reap the rewards. In return, global capitalism would flourish. And flourish it did. For seventy years, the system lifted billions out of poverty, spread democratic
norms, and delivered the most sustained period of wealth creation and peace in human history. It was not a perfect empire; far from it. From Vietnam to Iraq we can see it’s flaws. But it
was an empire nonetheless—an empire built on rules, markets, U.S. dollars, and aircraft carriers. It outlasted Soviet communism and, so far, has outpaced China’s state-directed Belt and Road
ambitions. The American system was not centrally planned, nor (when at its best) imposed by force. It was built on a radical simplicity: give people security and freedom, and prosperity
would follow. But J.D. Vance doesn’t understand that. And that’s genuinely worrying. But now, that empire is under threat—not from revolutionaries or rival powers, but from within. These
messages do not herald a new ideology. They do not unveil a bold doctrine or competing worldview. What they reveal is far more banal, and far more dangerous: stupidity. Not Greta Thunberg
challenging carbon economies. Not Beijing building an alternative infrastructure. Just rank, performative ignorance masquerading as the art of the deal. Figures like J.D. Vance seem entirely
oblivious to the brilliance of what Roosevelt sketched aboard the _Quincy_, what Eisenhower enforced at Suez, what Reagan championed, and what Clinton expanded. The _Pax Americana_ they
deride is the very system that made them wealthy, powerful, and relevant. And this is why Ukraine matters. This whole world order—the order of freedom, commerce, trade, and capitalism—on
which America has not only fattened itself but grown strong through strategic protection, is now being tested in Ukraine. It is there, in that scarred soil, that a true clash of
civilisations is unfolding: between the centrally planned and the liberally enriched, between subjects and citizens. It is not merely a border war. It is the fault line where the global
order is being contested, fought over, and possibly remade. That is why the clash in the Oval Office was not simply jaw-dropping political theatre—it was historic. It will echo for decades
as the moment it became clear that the Trump administration had no understanding of its role in upholding the ”Made in the USA” global order—the ecosystem of rules and security so
painstakingly constructed in the post-war world. Instead, the Trump administration treated geopolitics—America’s stewardship of _Pax Americana_—as if it were a playground squabble over who
gets the last of the mineral rights. Sweeties, tossed around. Ukraine, reduced to a bargaining chip. A transactional world of short-term “deals” replacing long-term strategy. For a time, I
wondered if I was missing something about the Trump administration—some grand economic manoeuvre unfolding behind the scenes. Was it merely sabre-rattling with Canada to mask a deeper
realignment? A hardball bid to force Europe to shoulder more of the burden for _Pax Americana_? A calculated push to modernise the Western alliance to confront a rising China? But there was
nothing so intricate. This flurry of texts is the smoking gun of a digital nervous system in imperial collapse. It doesn’t point to external threat. It reveals something bleaker: a cadre of
historically void, economically illiterate, tragically incurious individuals, accidentally seated at the helm of global power. So ignorant in their stupidity, they operate in bliss. And it
is precisely that bliss—their cheerful, unthinking ignorance—that allows them to attack their own judges, undermine their own courts, and dismantle the institutions of liberal democracy. Not
because they are hideous, Nazi-esque authoritarians bent on crushing dissent—but because they are children in the midst of a tantrum, smashing the furniture with no concept of what it
means. I don’t think they understand what they are pulling down. Like a meathead enforcer on a sports field—not focused on victory, but determined to obliterate any trace of talent or
intellect through sheer brute force, no matter the score. As Martin Luther King Jr. warned: _“Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.”_
But J.D. Vance wouldn’t understand that. And that’s genuinely worrying. A MESSAGE FROM THEARTICLE _We are the only publication that’s committed to covering every angle. We have an important
contribution to make, one that’s needed now more than ever, and we need your help to continue publishing throughout these hard economic times. So please, make a donation._
Trending News
Pediatric research - volume 10 issue 2, february 1976Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best expe...
[withdrawn] near miss with a track worker at llandegai tunnelNews story NEAR MISS WITH A TRACK WORKER AT LLANDEGAI TUNNEL Near miss with a track worker at Llandegai tunnel, Gwynedd,...
Going from good to great: a livable communities survey in westchester county, new yorkA livable community is one that allows its residents to maintain independence and quality of life as they age and to hav...
Page Not FoundPage Not Found The content that you're looking for is unavailable. You might find what you are looking for by using the ...
Quelle surprise: academics gaming the system sank the era journal rankingsSo here is the problem: research quality is a nebulous concept and it takes many years to work out whether someone’s out...
Latests News
America: the empire that texted itself to death | thearticleThe Trump administration, it seems, has discovered a novel way to declare war—by texting its plans to the Editor-in-Chie...
Book review: lessons from a township that resisted apartheidCan people on the wrong end of power change the world by working together? Or are the moments when the powerless take co...
Lee woodruff shines the light on military caregiversMemorial Day Sale! Join AARP for just $11 per year with a 5-year membership Join now and get a FREE gift. Expires 6/4 G...
What to Know About Refunds After Delays, CancellationsBy Nicole Gill Council and Susan B. Barnes, Updated March 17, 2025 AARP Published July 22, 2024 / Updated March 17, 20...
Column: whatever happens at the olympics, simone biles has written a comeback story for the agesSimone Biles has already won the 2024 Summer Olympic Games. Which isn’t to say we’re not waiting breathlessly to see her...