After all that fuss, parliament is sitting again. But to what purpose? | thearticle

The Prorogation Crisis is over. After all the hullabaloo last week about the suspension of Parliament, leading to its recall after an unprecedented Supreme Court judgement that Boris

Johnson’s advice to the Queen had been unlawful, what has the House of Commons done? The answer — surely embarrassing for all those who exulted over the triumph of legislature over executive

— is: so far, next to nothing. Now that the Conservative Party Conference is over, it should be business as usual in Westminster. Lords and Commons even have something serious to

scrutinise: a formal proposal to resolve the impasse on the Irish backstop. What is the betting, however, that very little scrutiny will take place in either chamber? The plan aims to square

the circle of four seemingly irreconcilable positions adopted by the key players (UK, EU, DUP and Dublin). It is conceptually complex and some of the details are quite technical. All far

too difficult for the vast majority of MPs to grasp, even if most could be bothered to do so. What will happen instead will be another bear-baiting session. The “rebel alliance” of

Opposition, independent MPs and the Speaker will try to corner the Prime Minister so that he can be subjected to an open-ended, no-holds-barred inquisition. That has hitherto been the

function of PMQs, which used to be limited to 15 minutes twice a week, until Tony Blair consolidated it into a single half-hour, which Speaker Bercow has arbitrarily extended to anything up

to an hour. Fair enough, you may say. Why shouldn’t the Prime Minister be forced to answer to the House as often as its members see fit? So, in principle, he or she should. But there is a

reason why these particular MPs are so desperate to bring Boris back. This Parliament is so rancorous, so impotent, so exhausted, that its only remaining raison d’être is to fulminate

against its primus inter pares. Every time Boris stands up, it draws negative energy from his presence. In his absence, it is quiescent. The Commons has morphed into the Boris-baiting show.

Hence the proposal that Parliament be prorogued again from next Tuesday, to allow a Queen’s Speech and a new session to commence the following week, has aroused practically no controversy.

The great and good have made their point. Prorogation will now cease to be the drama that became a crisis, and return to its normal role as an arcane, largely ceremonial procedure. The

public, which cares little about parliamentary process, but does care about Brexit, might at last get its money’s worth from MPs who sometimes seem to suppose that they receive their

salaries and expenses for nothing more than complaining about how unpopular they have become. Boris Johnson’s digs at Parliament in his conference speech will have hit home. It has indeed

been “on the blink” for too long. Fortunately there is now an end in sight. The deal now tabled by the Government could command a majority in the Commons, if only Brussels can be made to

take it seriously. In that case the Benn Act might never be needed and a new stalemate avoided. The prospect of a general election to give a new Government a fresh mandate ought to be

welcomed by all sides. The fact that it isn’t shows that something is amiss in the much-vaunted “Westminster democracy”. Indeed, a Cromwellian mood is beginning to pervade the country. Time

is running out for our political class to put its House in order.