Progressive manhattan lawmakers again push ‘rent control for the rich’
Progressive manhattan lawmakers again push ‘rent control for the rich’"
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
Two progressive Manhattan state lawmakers are back to pushing “rent control for the rich” to benefit residents of “Billionaire’s Row.” State Sen. Liz Krueger and Assemblywoman Linda
Rosenthal tried to sneak this into law last year, losing out only after we called out the injustice; they got a new version out of Senate committee last month but now are out with a third
one. Once again, their proposal applies to roughly 100 co-op buildings, mainly in Manhattan, that sit on land someone else owns; these “ground leases” are renegotiated every 20 to 30 years
and usually result in a rent reset for shareholders. Right now, an arbitration process kicks in when ground owners and co-ops can’t agree on a rent reset after the ground lease expires — all
as per the original contracts. Krueger-Rosenthal have given up on unconstitutionally setting strict limits on how much the land rent can increase; instead, they’re unconstitutionally
rewriting the rules to put the land-owner at a gross disadvantage. First, their new bill grants co-op boards right of first refusal (and 120 days to match) if the landowner opts to sell the
parcel to someone else — which as a practical matter majorly reduces how much any third party would bid, outright reducing the land’s value. MORE FROM POST EDITORIAL BOARD Second, it
drastically upends what happens if the co-op board finds it can’t pay the ground-lease rent that comes out of arbitration: Current law basically turns co-op shareholders into tenants with
rent-stabilized rights, but at rents negotiated in good faith; the new bill would instead set those rents at an insanely low base — drastically skewing the dynamics of the arbitration in the
co-op’s favor. The two Manhattan progressives are plainly looking to curry favor with a few wealthy constituents who’d see the value of their units skyrocket. Never mind the horrific
precedent this would set as the Legislature tears up existing contracts by upending the terms of agreement. Even if the law eventually got tossed as unconstitutional, it would poison New
York’s business climate by proving that the Legislature holds contract rights in complete contempt. If Senate and Assembly leaders don’t quash this madness, Gov. Hochul should tee up her
veto pen.
Trending News
Masterchef contestant charged with teen sex assaultThe West Australian Masterchef contestant Ben Ungermann was charged with two sex offences against a 16-year-old girl whi...
Should i create a login. Gov or id. Me account to sign in to va. Gov? | veterans affairsHere’s what to know: * LOGIN.GOV is our government’s one account provider. The U.S. government creates and maintains you...
'Emma'DÍAS DE CINE 'EMMA' 'Emma' Disponible hasta 21-02-2222 30/10/2020 00:03:27 Recomendado para mayores...
Like girls, boys are entering puberty earlierIt's been known for a while that girls start puberty earlier than they did in the past, sometimes as young as 7 or ...
Server Error500 Server Error...
Latests News
Progressive manhattan lawmakers again push ‘rent control for the rich’Two progressive Manhattan state lawmakers are back to pushing “rent control for the rich” to benefit residents of “Billi...
The perfect filling | British Dental JournalWhat makes a good filling? A study by the University of Birmingham shows that the success of a filling could be signific...
NOW YOU KNOW - Los Angeles TimesThe torch relay for the Summer Olympics began Thursday. The planned route for the 2004 Summer Games in Athens is 48,467 ...
The page you were looking for doesn't exist.You may have mistyped the address or the page may have moved.By proceeding, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and our ...
The page you were looking for doesn't exist.You may have mistyped the address or the page may have moved.By proceeding, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and our ...