Senate Republicans Approve Trump Court Nominee Sight Unseen
Senate Republicans Approve Trump Court Nominee Sight Unseen"
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
the national interest Senate Republicans Approve Trump Court Nominee Sight Unseen By Jonathan Chait, who’s been a New York political columnist since 2011. He writes the newsletter &c. Sept.
22, 2020 saved Save this article to read it later.
Find this story in your account’s ‘Saved for Later’ section.
Comment Photo: Sarah Silbiger/Getty Images Last night, less than three days after Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s sudden death, a gleeful Lindsey Graham announced that Republican senators had the
votes to replace her. “We’ve got the votes to confirm Justice Ginsburg’s replacement before the election,” he said on Fox News. “We’re going to move forward in the committee, we’re going to
report the nomination out of the committee to the floor of the United States Senate so we can vote before the election.”
Ten years ago, when the House of Representatives passed the Affordable Care Act, the main Republican point of contention was that the process had moved too fast. Every Republican talking
point attacking the bill denounced the method of its passage as having been “rammed through” or “jammed down our throats” at “lightning speed.” (The law was, in fact, crafted over the span
of nearly a year and entailed dozens of hours of public testimony.)
A secondary point of outrage was that, even though 60 senators had passed it, the Senate used a 50-vote reconciliation bill to smooth out differences between the two bills. The notion that
such a large social change would be implemented without minority party buy-in added to the indignation.
Here, the upper chamber has decided to approve President Trump’s nominee for a lifetime appointment on a court that — unlike courts in many other countries — has supreme power of judicial
review. Unlike a health-care law, which can be repealed if people don’t like it, it is impossible to recall a confirmed Supreme Court justice barring a constitutional amendment. The Senate
has held zero hearings to assess the nominee’s fitness, independence, or viewpoint.
Most comically, they have rounded up the votes without even knowing the justice’s identity. If you remember the Obamacare debate, Nancy Pelosi said, “We have to pass the bill so that you can
find out what is in it — away from the fog of the controversy.” Pelosi was actually trying to say that Republican distortions had made it impossible for Americans to understand what the law
actually did, and once they saw it in action, they would approve of it. (She was right about that.) They distorted the quote, always excising the last clause, to imply she was trying to
smuggle details into law before Congress could learn what the law did.
But here, Republican senators have done exactly that! They have secured 50 votes to confirm a justice-to-be-named-later to a lifetime appointment — one that, along with four like-minded
colleagues, confers power to strike down any law she wishes for any reason she claims. They’re confirming the justice and then finding out who she is.
In a sense this is all so obvious it hardly bears stating. Of course the process complaints against Obamacare were disingenuous. If the Trump era has proven anything, it’s that every single
complaint about behavior norms or process that Republicans threw at Barack Obama was disingenuous. He’s rushing bills into law too quickly! He’s arrogant! He’s using executive power! Cozying
up with dictators! Disparaging American exceptionalism! Crony capitalism! Using a personal email address! Etc., etc.
If Democrats win control of government, Republicans will be back to complaining about process again. In particular, they will demand everything be done slowly and deliberately, and there
will not be a process slow and deliberate enough to satisfy them. But if the confirmation of the as-yet-unnamed third Trump Supreme Court justice demonstrates anything at all, it’s how
utterly disingenuous those claims about rushing through big changes without debate or bipartisan support really are.
Get the latest from Jonathan Chait in your inbox. Analysis and commentary on the latest political news from New York columnist Jonathan Chait. Email This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and
the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. Vox Media, LLC Terms and Privacy Notice By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice and to receive email
correspondence from us.
Tags: politics the national interest donald trump supreme court Show Leave a Comment Senate Republicans Approve Trump Court Nominee Sight Unseen
Trending News
Research report: social-emotional learningPrograms that teach students how to recognize their emotions, solve problems, and form healthy relationships may continu...
'His energy will motivate the team': Mayank Agarwal’s coach speaks to TNMMayank Agarwal has been flown in to England to replace Vijay Shankar in the Indian World Cup Squad. And if there is one ...
To ensure stock of COVID-19 testing kits, India restricts exportThe Indian government on Saturday put curbs on exports of COVID-19 diagnostic kits with a view to discourage shipments a...
Therese anne fowler's 6 favorite booksSAVE ME THE WALTZ by Zelda Sayre Fitzgerald (out of print). A modernist, semi-autobiographical novel about a tormented b...
Western Mines lands another nickel hitWestern Mines lands another nickel hitMatt BirneySponsoredThu, 26 May 2022 5:08PMEmail Matt BirneyCamera IconDiamond dri...
Latests News
Senate Republicans Approve Trump Court Nominee Sight Unseenthe national interest Senate Republicans Approve Trump Court Nominee Sight Unseen By Jonathan Chait, who’s been a New Yo...
Therese anne fowler's 6 favorite booksSAVE ME THE WALTZ by Zelda Sayre Fitzgerald (out of print). A modernist, semi-autobiographical novel about a tormented b...
Western Mines lands another nickel hitWestern Mines lands another nickel hitMatt BirneySponsoredThu, 26 May 2022 5:08PMEmail Matt BirneyCamera IconDiamond dri...
Research report: social-emotional learningPrograms that teach students how to recognize their emotions, solve problems, and form healthy relationships may continu...
Coke’s profit fizzer after drinks unit hiccupCoke’s profit fizzer after drinks unit hiccupAAPThe West AustralianWed, 23 August 2017 8:12AMShare to FacebookShare to X...