Delhi high court asks centre why single, unmarried women can’t go for surrogacy
Delhi high court asks centre why single, unmarried women can’t go for surrogacy"
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
GUWAHATI: Why should the marital status of a woman be a deterrent when it comes to availing the benefits of surrogacy under the law? The Delhi High Court on Monday asked a very valid
question to the Centre regarding the exclusion of single and unmarried women from availing the benefits of surrogacy. Ready for a challenge? Click here to take our quiz and show off your
knowledge! The court was hearing a plea filed by a 44-year-old unmarried woman who wished to have “a genetically related offspring via surrogacy ” but needed donor eggs. Noting that an
“intending woman” under the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 means an Indian woman who is a “widow” or “divorcee”, a bench headed by Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma questioned the
rationale behind associating the marital status of a woman with her eligibility to undergo the procedure. “Why marital status for intending woman? (Even if) she (a widow or a divorcee) has
no matrimonial life, why this discrimination?” the bench, also comprising Justice Sanjeev Narula, asked. Ready for a challenge? Click here to take our quiz and show off your knowledge! The
lawyer present in the court on behalf of the National Medical Commission (NMC), T Singhdev, said he too would examine the issue. The petitioner mentioned in the court that she was not able
to get married earlier and now she wants to have a child through surrogacy because of her age. She said that it is medically not advisable to use her own gametes for the procedure and so she
needs a donor for the same. The petitioner’s brother has consented to donate his male gametes so that they remain genetically connected. “(However) what came as an embargo to the petitioner
are the provisions of the Act, 2021, which prohibit the petitioner to have a child by way of surrogacy,” the petition stated, adding that the reproduction of a female gamete has no
connection with a woman’s marital status and the state cannot regulate the reproductive choices of its citizens. The matter will be next heard on October 31st and before that the woman
has been asked to produce medical proof that that her eggs can’t be used because that might compromise the fetus.
Trending News
North jersey police groups endorse bush campaignPATERSON, N.J. — Republican George Bush received endorsements today from northern New Jersey law officers and he told th...
Pacific dining car's face-liftI enjoyed Valli Herman’s article on the Pacific Dining Car (“A Little Nip and Tuck for Those Saggy Seats,” July 15) and ...
Condolences pour in for contractor on social mediaMumbai, June 6 (IANS) A day after the demise of veteran comedian Dinyar Contractor, condolences continued to pour in on ...
Stop washing your dirty linenThere is no chore young working professionals in Bangalore hate as much as washing clothes. Laundromats and laundry serv...
Watch: shah rukh khan honoured with pardo alla carriera award, confesses he can’t pronounce name, video goes viralAt the Locarno Film Festival, Shah Rukh Khan was honoured with Pardo Alla Carriera Award for his contribution towards ci...
Latests News
Delhi high court asks centre why single, unmarried women can’t go for surrogacyGUWAHATI: Why should the marital status of a woman be a deterrent when it comes to availing the benefits of surrogacy un...
Modi, shah lead bjp's 'save democracy' fast, congress mocks itNew Delhi, April 12 (IANS) Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP President Amit Shah on Thursday led their party MPs acro...
VILLA PARK - Los Angeles TimesINTRODUCING REBUILDING L.A. In “Rebuilding Los Angeles,” Kate Cagle explores the aftermath of L.A.’s recent wildfires, e...
Sorry!The Week...
Meghan markle permitted person to tell biographers about 'private' letterMeghan Markle gave a person permission to discuss the existence of a bombshell letter to her father with the authors of ...