Unveiling the job characteristics-creativity rapport through the bridge of thriving: a self-determination perspective from the chinese hospitality sector

ABSTRACT Grounding on self-determination theory, this study proposes that job characteristics (task variety and skill variety) enhance employees’ creativity through thriving at work. It also

aims to examine the boundary condition of managerial coaching for the link between job characteristics and thriving. A time-lagged dyadic data collected from 313 frontline hospitality

individuals’ analyses performed through AMOS and PROCESS macro show that job characteristics promote individuals’ thriving and thriving affects individuals’ creativity positively. Skill

variety as compared to task variety was found to be more strongly affecting thriving at work. Thriving mediates job characteristics and creativity. Moreover, managerial coaching

significantly moderates the effects of job characteristics on thriving. This study supports the self-determination perspective of job characteristics, thriving, creativity and managerial

coaching in the Chinese hospitality sector. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS HOW DOES SUPERVISORS’ DEVELOPMENTAL FEEDBACK AFFECT CHINESE EMPLOYEES’ WORK ROLE PERFORMANCE? THE ROLES OF

THRIVING AT WORK AND TRAIT MINDFULNESS Article Open access 06 November 2024 MINDFULNESS AND JOB PERFORMANCE IN CHINESE NONPROFIT WORKERS: MEDIATION EFFECTS OF PANA AND WORK ENGAGEMENT

Article Open access 25 November 2023 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, GREEN INNOVATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE: A MODERATED-MEDIATION MODEL Article Open

access 08 February 2024 INTRODUCTION The evolution of globalization has urged the need for a skilled and energetic workforce. In this vein, researchers have suggested exploring employees’

growth and well-being by investigating thriving at work (Jiang et al. 2020). Thriving at work is described as the combined experience of vitality and learning (Spreitzer et al. 2005). It is

considered an important element for sustainable performance (Hussain et al. 2022). Socially-embedded model of thriving suggests that thriving can be promoted through contextual factors

(Spreitzer et al. 2005). Since the literature lacks in investigating job characteristics as unique contextual factors in promoting thriving at work. We advance the literature by

investigating task and skill variety with thriving, which will lead to employees’ creativity. The job characteristics model suggests that job-related factors (e.g., task variety, skill

variety) play a key role in enriching work experience, which further reflects improved performance (Oldham and Hackman 1980). Task variety is referred as to dealing with a variety of

activities and/or being versatile in operating different work tasks, entailing a wide range of skills (Oldham and Hackman 1980). Skill variety refers to being versatile and learning the

skills that are needed to accomplish the required set of job activities (Morgeson and Humphrey 2006). Job characteristics contain an essence of intrinsic motivation which makes individuals’

jobs worthy and meaningful. To complete a variety of tasks, an employee needs to learn a variety of skills. This sense of struggle turns the job characteristics into a frequently happening

novel event (Shao et al. 2022). We propose this study based on self-determination theory (SDT) (Ryan and Deci 2020), which suggests that individuals’ basic psychological need satisfaction

boosts motivation. Once the need satisfaction is achieved, employees experience a sense of vitality (Kinoshita et al. 2022) and learning (Spreitzer and Porath 2014). In this context,

individuals’ thriving can be translated into a unique and creative performance. Creativity is the development of novel ideas about products, practices, services, or procedures (Ahmad et al.

2022). The current study entails managerial coaching as a boundary condition between task, skill variety and thriving. Managerial coaching explicates an enacting behavior of managers to

facilitate learning by which employees can master the skills and abilities required by a job (Ellinger and Bostrom 1999), which creates a positive impact on job outcomes. This study

underscores multifold additions to an existing pool of research. First, based on SDT, explores the effects of task variety and skill variety on thriving. Secondly, it unveils the thriving

and creativity link. Third, it investigates the crucial mediating mechanism of thriving among task variety, skill variety and creativity. Fourth, examining managerial coaching as a boundary

condition among TV, SV and thriving. Fifth, testing the thriving-based mediation mechanism linking job characteristics and creativity in the Chinese hospitality industry. Moreover, the

present study responds to the research calls (e.g., Jiang et al. 2020; Kleine et al. 2019; Shahid et al. 2020), to explore drivers and outcomes of thriving. The rest of the paper is

structured on the following pattern; Section “Literature and hypotheses” discusses the theoretical arguments about the following proposed relationships (“Task variety and thriving”, “Skill

variety and thriving”, “Thriving and creativity”, “Mediating role of thriving”, “Moderating role of managerial coaching”); section “Methodology” that discusses the sampling measurements and

details of demographic variables (“Sample and procedures”, “Measures”, “Control variables”); section “Results” that states the correlations, reliability, validity and hypotheses testing

results (“Descriptive statistics”, “Validity and reliability”, “Hypotheses test”); section “Discussion” that underscores the theoretical and practical implications along with limitations and

future research directions (“Theoretical implications”, “Practical implications”, “Limitations and future direction”) and at last “Conclusion” which concludes the whole background and

results of the paper. LITERATURE AND HYPOTHESES TASK VARIETY AND THRIVING Task variety is explained as hands-on different tasks in a confined period and broadens the scope of the job

(Morgeson and Humphrey 2006). General phenomena about jobs containing multiple tasks have been observed to be competitive and interesting (Sims et al. 1976). Task variety provides the

opportunity to perform different tasks for one assignment and they get the chance to develop an enhanced understanding of the tasks (Shao et al. 2022). Since task variety contains

sensational job experience, we propose that task variety will result in a higher level of thriving. Spreitzer et al. (2005) argued thriving is a source of promoting well-being through

formulating self-regulation in individuals. “It is the psychological state where individuals experience a sense of vitality and learning at work” (Spreitzer et al. 2005, p. 538). Vitality is

referred as to a sense of being alive along with learning, which strives for gaining knowledge, skills and competencies to accomplish assigned work (Jiang et al. 2020). The thriving model

has recognized the contextual features as enablers of thriving (Chang and Busser 2020), which encourages positive work behavior beneficial for learning while feeling vital (Jiang et al.

2020). Task variety provides significant chances to utilize the abilities to have meaning and motivation in the work (Humphrey et al. 2007). It opposes a stagnant state and acts as a

continuous source of learning which makes the work more interesting (Parker and Grote 2022). Self-determination theory delineates a fundamental aspect that humans are naturally inclined

toward attaining psychological nourishment (Ryan and Deci 2020). Individuals are exposed to different job-related challenges to deal with, and integration and internalization of these

experiences result in well-being. SDT states the significance of three psychological needs which are vital to be met for accomplishing self-development: autonomy need (a sense of freedom and

cheerfulness), competence need (sense of capability, efficacy, and aptitude), and relatedness need (sense of being connected) (Magson et al. 2022). Satisfying the psychological needs gears

up a sense of learning and vitality from a componential perspective. It has been suggested that need satisfaction is a source of enabling vitality among individuals (Magson et al. 2022). A

critical aspect of SDT research expounds that the job design formulates the grounds for need satisfaction that is ultimately translated into thriving (Ryan and Deci 2020). Motivational job

characteristics form a work environment that satisfies individuals’ psychological needs which motivates them to act agentic (Jiang et al. 2020). It is argued that task variety possesses a

functional value and leads to personal growth and development (Shao et al. 2022). Based on the thriving model (Spreitzer and Porath 2014) and SDT (Ryan and Deci 2020), It is argued that TV

satisfies the psychological needs crucial for motivation to experience thriving. H1: Task variety is positively related to thriving at work. SKILL VARIETY AND THRIVING Skill variety is the

extent to which the work tasks require different skills to be performed (Binder and Blankenberg 2022). Skill variety gleans useful outcomes such as employee engagement, motivation, and job

involvement (Humphrey et al. 2007). The challenging nature of work makes employees more engaged in acquiring knowledge and expertise (Saks 2019). Job design theory suggests that performing

job tasks turns out to be more meaningful if it contains a greater extent of challenges and skill variety (Oldham and Hackman 1980). Skill variety on the one hand is a challenge, but on the

other hand, it is an opportunity to perform such a job which can lead to job satisfaction (Hackman and Oldham 1976). SDT explicates that fulfillment of basic psychological needs results in a

high level of self-determined motivation along with better behavior (Magson et al. 2022). Learning different skills motivates individuals and satisfies the need for competence (individuals’

tendency to deal with the environment). When employees’ job requires them to glean a variety of skills, it creates a meaning of acquiring knowledge and competence which motivates them.

Learning and mastering different skills can be possible in a learning conducive environment. Magson et al. (2022) suggested that having a variety of skills to accomplish an assignment, makes

individuals more committed, motivated and satisfied. When individuals are exposed to job-related challenges, they tend to internalize these experiences which are translated into

self-development (Jiang et al. 2019). Skill variety is a pool of resources that garners one’s self-growth and SDT also explicates the natural tendency of individuals toward psychological

growth (Ryan and Deci 2020). Extant literature has postulated that skill variety makes employees engaged at work (Saks 2019; Wan et al. 2018). Which exhibits that learning new skills makes

motivated and energetic. Employees involved in exploration, tend to interact with each other which creates a pool of resources enabling a learning mode (Spreitzer et al. 2005). Exploring new

ways of doing things broadens the physical horizons and creates the meaning of the work. Finally, from SDT’s perspective, task related context builds grounds for meeting basic psychological

needs, necessary to enable a sense of vitality and learning (Spreitzer and Porath 2014). We postulate skill variety as an opportunity to learn and feel vital through intrinsic motivation

and as a gateway of psychological nutriments required for satisfying fundamental needs and eventually to experience thriving (Jiang et al. 2020). In line with the thriving model (Spreitzer

et al. 2005) and SDT (Ryan and Deci 2020), it is argued that skill variety satisfies the psychological needs conducive to thriving. H2: Skill variety has a positive influence on thriving.

THRIVING AND CREATIVITY We suggest that vitality and learning make employees utilize their knowledge, skills and energy to bring creativity to their job performance. Creativity is referred

to the generation of unique philosophies and ideas for job procedures and outcomes (Riaz et al. 2018). Individuals realize the opportunities for change and improvement through the learning

process. Leaning requires individuals to acquire that promotes creativity (Amabile 1998). First, thriving individuals are in a better state to experience self-development (Spreitzer et al.

2005), and individuals working in a supportive environment act more positively in the formulation of creative work solutions (Lee 2018). Previous literature posed that thriving is an

important cause of bringing happiness (Basinska and Rozkwitalska 2020), which has been explained as an emotional state and is a source of nurturing positivity in several aspects of life

(Ravina-Ripoll et al. 2022). Moreover, happiness management has been argued to produce resources conducive to creativity (Ravina Ripoll et al. 2019). Secondly, thriving individuals acquire

appropriate skills and knowledge. Learning is inevitable for professional development, and to bring creativity to job performance (Shao et al. 2022), and assuring the effectiveness of

creative efforts (Carmeli and Spreitzer 2009). Third, vitality acts as a positive emotion that enables individuals to experience mental and physical nourishment, stay active and energetic,

learn, and be capable enough to bring new problem-solving techniques (Zhang et al. 2022), and boost motivation. Importantly, Motivation is a prerequisite of creativity, based on SDT (Yang et

al. 2019). H3: Thriving is positively related to creativity. MEDIATING ROLE OF THRIVING The present study argues that task variety and skill variety as motivational job characteristics will

enable thriving, which in turn will boost creativity. It has been suggested by job characteristics theory (Hackman and Oldham 1976), that work-related contextual features tend to boost

internal motivation among individuals (Fried and Ferris 1987). Skill variety refers to acquiring diverse skills through job rotation and training workshops, whereas task variety is referred

as to performing different tasks in a job context (Morgeson and Humphrey 2006). The thriving model (Spreitzer et al. 2005) and its extension (Spreitzer and Porath 2014) suggest that job

characteristics gear up thriving experiences. Job characteristics shape a framework where individuals feel nourished through the fulfillment of psychological needs which help ignite agentic

work behaviors (Spreitzer and Porath 2014). Previous literature confirms the job characteristics and thriving relationship, grounding on SDT (Jiang et al. 2020). It also shows the

consistency among job characteristics and SDT which aims at enhancing internal motivation through shaping an optimal work design. For instance, task variety and skill variety satisfy

competence needs as it intends to acquire diverse skills and extended knowledge to accomplish the work. Individuals performing different tasks acquire the required knowledge and skills,

which not only accomplish their targets but makes them motivated and satisfied. It has been observed that some features of the work context intrinsically motivate employees to accomplish

their assignments energetically (Jiang et al. 2020; Li 2018). Job characteristics (e.g., TV, SV) motivate individuals to engender the experience of knowledge and meaningfulness of results

(Hackman and Oldham 1976), and this motivation lets employees experience vitality and learning. The thriving individuals gain momentum based on aliveness, along with a continuous sense of

meaningfulness and improvement in what they do (Porath et al. 2012). One aspect is that learning enables individuals to attain professional knowledge and competencies which ultimately

promote creative behavior and the other aspect explicates that individuals experiencing vitality, tend to be motivated and energetic which helps in creative process implementation (Kleine et

al. 2019). The job characteristics model suggests that contextual factors (e.g., task variety, skill variety) can engender enriched motivation through work philosophies. It has been

concluded in early and recent studies that motivational job characteristics accomplish useful work output (Humphrey et al. 2007). Individuals acquiring knowledge and competencies set the

stage for accomplishing job duties in a creative way (Muñoz-Pascual and Galende 2020). When individuals keep on learning new knowledge and skills, it boosts their confidence and they try out

new things by thinking out of the box and generating creative ideas There are empirical shreds of evidence exist which argue that thriving acts as an important factor in promoting

creativity in job performance (Yang et al. 2019). In line with SDT, which states that individuals have the propensity to grow psychologically (Ryan and Deci 2020), and work contexts act as a

base for fulfilling the need satisfaction for enabling thriving at work (Spreitzer and Porath 2014), which promotes employee creativity (Yang et al. 2019). H4: Thriving mediates the

positive relation between (a) task variety (b) skill variety and creativity. MODERATING ROLE OF MANAGERIAL COACHING It is referred to as a facilitator for learning in a workplace setting by

enacting specific behavior which enables the learning outcomes and development of employees (Ellinger and Ellinger 2021). Coaching is an ongoing process that develops a mechanism of feedback

and support for performance enhancement and guiding employees about what is expected from them (Carvalho et al. 2021). Extant literature in the field of managerial coaching witnessed its

impact in showing the improved performance (Ellinger et al. 2003; Raza et al. 2018; Zhao and Liu 2020). Managerial coaching has gained the utmost attention across scholarly literature for

being an effective tool for talent retention and meeting the developmental expectations of employees (Adele et al. 2022). Existing literature suggests that coaching tends to affect

employees’ learning and performance (Raza et al. 2018). Managerial coaching is a decisive role performed by executives or managers for their subordinates, and it is suggested that vital and

supportive managerial acts enhance the employees’ learning, efficiency and effectiveness (Peterson and Hicks 1996). Since job functions have revolutionized managers’ roles and

responsibilities, the ways of pursuing management functions have also been modified for putting strategies into action for achieving organizational goals (Raza et al. 2018). Employees are

better able to perform their responsibilities and achieve required outcomes with managerial guidelines (Raza et al. 2018). Managers are considered instructors (Cohen and Tichy 1998), and

coaches (Abid et al. 2019), by guiding employees on how to perform a variety of tasks and achieve work goals. Considering managerial coaching as a beneficial mechanism, employees tend to

extend their pool of knowledge and feel committed, responsible, satisfied, and thriving (Abid et al. 2019). The coaching behavior motivates subordinates by providing them feedback through

transmitting knowledge to glean enhanced performance (Abid et al. 2019). Managers can bring better performing passion to employees by showing clear pathways, quick feedback, and providing

learning opportunities (Adele et al. 2022). Since, skill variety requires a variety of skills (Oldham and Hackman 1980) and task variety requires different tasks to perform (Morgeson and

Humphrey 2006), Managerial coaching facilitates them with the training and tactics for improved performance (Abid et al. 2019), and the interaction between managerial coaching and job

characteristics will enable a higher level of thriving. Therefore, we propose that managerial coaching can act as a moderator between job characteristics and thriving. H5: Managerial

coaching moderates the relationship between (a) task variety (b) skill variety and thriving. We have added Table 1 to highlight the important literature related to thriving at work.

METHODOLOGY SAMPLE AND PROCEDURES Participants are full-time frontline hotel employees paired with their immediate supervisors. Frontline employees are considered to be the reflection of

service quality (Wu and Chen 2019). We obtained data in two waves with a 1-month time gap through a dyadic-data approach to avoid CMB (Podsakoff et al. 2003). We used a simple random

sampling technique to collect the data. We approached HR personnel of hotels in China to get their permission and explained the purpose of the study to the agreed participant with an

assurance about the confidentiality of their personal information. The data collection process was carried out in the medium to high-ranked hotels. The respondents belonged to different

departments in the hotel i.e., customer service representatives, waiters, housekeeping staff, food handling personnel, event and tour management staff and reception, etc. The pictorial

representation of the methodology has been given in Fig. 1. The data was collected during the year 2022 when the pandemic and preventive measures for COVID-19 were in practice. In the first

wave, during February 2022, we distributed 380 questionnaires to the employees with the help of human resource personnel. The employees filled in the questionnaires about their task and

skill variety, thriving at work and managerial coaching. In the second wave, after a month, in March 2022, the concerned supervisors were asked to fill in the questionnaires to rate the

creativity of their subordinates. Each supervisor was dealing with 7–15 employees on average. Out of 380 questionnaires, we received 339 useful questionnaires in the first wave. After

getting responses from the supervisors in the second wave, we finally got 313 pairs of questionnaires which summed up to a response rate of 82.37%, encompassing a sampling error ±5.53% at

95% confidence level. The final sample set provided a sufficient piece of information to carry out the analysis. MEASURES TASK VARIETY, SKILL VARIETY We measured task and skill variety,

through a 4-item scale for each variable adapted from (Morgeson and Humphrey 2006)_. “_The job requires the performance of a wide range of tasks.” and “The job requires me to utilize a

variety of different skills to complete the work.” were the sample items with Cronbach alpha values of 0.847 and 0.837 for task and skill variety respectively. THRIVING AT WORK This

construct was measured by using a 10-item scale by (Porath et al. 2012). “I am not learning” (reverse scored) was the sample item with a Cronbach alpha value of 0.918. MANAGERIAL COACHING We

measured managerial coaching through an 8-item scale adapted from (Wang 2013). The sample items included “My superior gives feedback to subordinates with constructive advice. The Cronbach

alpha for this study was 0.916. CREATIVITY We examined it through a supervisor-rated 4-item scale adapted from Farmer et al. (2003). “This employee seeks new ideas and ways to solve

problems” was the sample item with an alpha value of 0.828. CONTROL VARIABLES The effects of demographic variables were controlled for their influence on the main variables (Ng and Feldman

2012). Out of 313 samples, 43.1% were male which was coded as “1” and “2” for females. In terms of age, 25.9% were from the 18–25 years bracket, coded as “1”, 31% were from 26–33 years,

coded as “2”, 22% from 34 to 41, coded as “3”, 10.9% from 42–49, coded as “4” and rest 10.2% were above 50 years old, coded as “5”. Education was detailed as 8.6% left before reaching high

school, coded as “1”, 32.6% had a high school certificate, coded as “2”, 38.7% had a college degree, coded as “3”, 15% were bachelor, coded as “4” and 5.1% were Master’s degree holder, coded

as “5”. In total, 42.5% of employees were serving from 1–5 years, coded as “1”, 31% served 6–10 years, coded as “2”, 16% of employees had an experience of 11–15 years, coded as “3”, 6.4%

were doing their jobs since last 16–20 years, coded as “4” and 4.2% were accumulated to have an experience more than 21 years, coded as “5”. RESULTS DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS Table 2 portrays

the value of the mean, SD and correlations. As expected, TV (_r_ = 0.408, _p_ < 0.01), and SV (_r_ = 0.490, _p_ < 0.01) were positively related to thriving at work. Thriving was

positively associated with CRE (_r_ = 0.450, _p_ < 0.01). Moreover, MC was positively related with TAW (_r_ = 0.324, _p_ < 0.01). These results provide support for the hypotheses in

the present study (Table 2). VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY To test the construct validity, CFA was conducted and the measurement model’s fitness was analyzed by checking necessary indicators

calculated through AMOS (Kline and Kline 1998). 5-factor model exhibited a good fit _χ_2 = 648.940, df = 395, _χ_2/df = 1.643, SRMR = 0.043, TLI = 0.944, CFI = 0.949, RMSEA = 0.045 The

values of composite reliability (CR) 0.828–0.918 were >0.70, meeting the threshold requirement (Hair et al. 2011). For reliability check, Cronbach’s alpha ranging from 0.828–0.918 met the

requirement for being greater than 0.70. The values of average variance extraction were 0.531–0.583, greater than 0.50. For discriminant validity, both requirements, of having correlation

coefficients lower than 0.85 and the square root of AVE should be higher than the coefficient between the variables, were met (Kline 2005) (Table 2). HYPOTHESES TEST We used SEM (AMOS)

(Bollen 1989) to test the hypotheses (H1–H4) of the present study due to its high predictive power for complex models. As a first step, multicollinearity was examined through the variance

inflation factor (VIF) whose values were observed as 1.168–1.480, lower than 3, and found to be satisfactory. H1 and H2 proposed that task variety and skill variety are positively related to

thriving at work. H3 anticipated that thriving is positively associated with creativity. After running the results, we found that the values were aligned to the proposed relationships (_β_

TV → TAW = 0.244, _p_ < 0.01), (_β_ SV → TAW = 0.431, _p_ < 0.01) and (_β_ TAW → CRE = 0.531, _p_ < 0.001) (Fig. 2, Table 3). Moreover, the graph of the structural equation model is

also plotted to see the regression results (Fig. 3). H4a and H4b argued that thriving mediates the relationship between Task variety, skill variety, and creativity. The said paths were

investigated through Bias-corrected method based on 5000 bootstrap samples at a 95% confidence interval (Hayes 2013). Our results confirmed and provided support for the said relationships

(_β_ TV → TAW → CRE) = 0.130, _p_ < 0.01 [CI: 0.038, 0.235], and (_β_ SV → TAW → CRE = 0.229, _p_ < 0.001 [CI: 0.131, 0.342] (Table 3). The CI does not include any zero between BOOT CI

[LLCI, ULCI], shows satisfactory indirect effects along with a good fit _χ_2 = 422.385, df = 205, _χ_2/df = 2.060, SRMR = 0.050, TLI = 0.930, CFI = 0.938, RMSEA = 0.058. Proceeding with H5a

and H5b which postulate the boundary condition, PROCESS macro model 1 bias-corrected method with 5000 bootstraps sample at 95% confidence interval (CI) (Hayes 2013), exhibited that

managerial coaching satisfactorily moderated TV, SV and thriving (_β_ MC × TV → TAW = 0.190, _p_ < 0.001 [CI: 0.090, 0.290], _p_ < 0.001) and (_β_ MC × SV → TAW = 0.120, _p_ < 0.01

[CI: 0.034, 0.207] (Fig. 2, Table 3). Moreover, Figs. 4 and 5 show the plotting of the interaction effects of MC. The results show that interaction effects were significant at the high level

of MC for task variety {_β_ = 0.490, _t_ = 7.118, _p_ < 0.001} and skill variety {_β_ = 0.519, _t_ = 8.610, _p_ < 0.001} and found to be insignificant at a low level of MC for task

variety {_β_ = 0.133, _t_ = 2.159, ns} and skill variety {_β_ = 0.292, _t_ = 4.98, ns}. DISCUSSION The present study discussed how job characteristics play a crucial role to promote

employees’ creativity through thriving. Moreover, examining the boundary condition of managerial coaching on the relationship between TV, SV and thriving. The job characteristics model

(Oldham and Hackman 1980) suggested that job characteristics tend to shape enhanced experience which leads to job satisfaction and effective performance. Based on SDT, this study proposed

that task and skill variety have a positive influence on thriving. This shows when employees deal with a variety of tasks and utilize different skills to accomplish their jobs, they get

intrinsically motivated which makes them learn and feel vital. The study also postulates thriving is conducive to creativity for which we found support through study results that thriving

individuals’ energy and learning enable them to accomplish their work plans creatively (Table 4). The study at hand proposed that managerial coaching moderates the link between TV, SV and

thriving at work. The results show support for these relationships. This confirms that when employees are dealing with a variety of tasks and utilizing a variety of skills to accomplish

their job duties, in this situation, the manager’s coaching can guide them in the right direction. THEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS This study underscores multiple theoretical implications.

Grounding on SDT (Ryan and Deci 2020), this study suggests that individuals feel motivated when their basic psychological needs are met and they feel thrive at work. First, we have

investigated the effects of TV and SV on thriving at work. which states that individuals who experience task variety and skill variety to accomplish their jobs, tend to acquire Knowledge,

and experience vitality which makes them feel thrived at work. Secondly, examining the link between thriving and employees’ creativity and also the mediating link of thriving between TV, SV

and employees’ creativity. This suggests that when employees are dealing with a variety of tasks and acquire a variety of skills to perform their jobs, they feel thrived at work which

eventually makes them think out of the box and exhibit creative behavior. Third, investigating the crucial boundary condition (managerial coaching) on the link between TV, SV and thriving.

This suggests that individuals require managerial coaching while performing a variety of tasks and getting directions for acquiring new skills to experience learning and vitality. Lastly,

Based on self-determination theory, this study is consistent with the Socially-embedded model of thriving (Spreitzer et al. 2005) which suggests that SDT is a key mechanism for explaining

thriving phenomena. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS The present study also offers practical insights for managers. First, the results showed that TV and SV are enablers of thriving which suggests

that managers should design employees’ jobs in such a way that they should contain a variety of tasks. It provides an exciting learning opportunity for employees and makes them versatile in

different job tasks. Secondly, as skill variety also enables employees’ thriving, managers can take this opportunity to design the jobs in such an achievable way that requires employees to

learn new skills. This can be the opportunity for the employees to acquire diversified skills and experience vitality at work which can be a beneficial step toward career development. Third,

results showed that task variety and skill variety enable individuals’ thriving, which leads to creativity. This suggests that managers should shape the work environment in such a manner

that can fulfill employees’ basic psychological needs and they can thrive to perform creatively. Fourth, in the scenario, where employees are dealing with a variety of tasks and gaining a

variety of skills to accomplish their jobs, managers must be able to provide their expert assistance to employees which will not only motivate them but also guide them to better deal with

multiple tasks and to utilize their skills. Moreover, this study suggests managers consider the grounds of the theory of happiness to shape a positive climate that is conducive to creativity

(Ravina-Ripoll et al. 2021). LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTION The present study contributes to the existing body of knowledge theoretically and practically, but it is not without

limitations which is also a lead for future studies. First, we adopted a cross-sectional design of the study by collecting data at two points in time that could only provide the opinions and

perceptions of employees at a specific point of time, future studies can mitigate this limitation by conducting a longitudinal design of the study (collecting the same data over some time

to track the changes in the behavior of the same respondent in several waves) which can provide more generalized results. Second, we chose the hospitality sector of China as an area of

interest to test the proposed relationship and this selection raises the question of the generalizability of the results to other cultures i.e., Chinese and Western (Zhang et al. 2019) and

other sectors i.e., Telecom, Banks, Insurance companies, Construction, etc. This shortcoming can be addressed by examining our research model in other cultures i.e., western and other types

of industries. Third, the dyadic-data approach that means the data collected about employees’ creativity was obtained through the supervisor-rated scale of creativity, to avoid CMB

(Podsakoff et al. 2003), yet some shortcomings could be observed in this process i.e., creativity as the behavioral outcome might not be observed in actual by managers and for this, taking

comments from customers about employees’ creativity and also conducting mid-term appraisals about employees’ creative behavior might give a better idea to both employees and management.

Fourth, we have investigated individual-level factors to examine their effects on thriving at work, future studies can explore these variables at the team level i.e., (team creativity,

collective thriving, team empowerment, team proactivity, etc.) to enhance understanding of a collective influence of these factors. The present study has examined how TV and SV promote

thriving that is conducive to the creativity of individuals based on self-determination theory. Yet, there is an extensive need to explore more contextual factors (enhancing/declining)

leading to thriving at work. We have investigated managerial coaching as a moderator in this study, while future studies can undertake supportive factors (i.e., organizational support,

organizational justice) and other leadership forms (i.e., transformational, servant, participative, transactional) to test if their presence moderates the link between other contextual

factors and thriving. Moreover, since the data was collected during the pandemic, which may show creativity under different levels of anxiety and psychological fear. Future studies can test

this theoretical model in the post-pandemic era to see the level of thriving and creativity of employees. CONCLUSION The present study is based on self-determination theory, expounding that

employees dealing with a variety of tasks and acquiring skills, feel motivated and thrive and ultimately perform creatively. Moreover, results showed that managerial coaching moderated the

link between TV, SV and thriving. Conclusively, the present study provides useful insights into hospitality employees and managers. The findings explore the factors by which their thriving

can be boosted. It simply suggests that employees’ creative performance is the result of job characteristics based on SDT. These associations of the underlying variables of the study can

provide useful insights for the hospitality sector of China specially to understand how thriving can be increased in employees. DATA AVAILABILITY The datasets generated during and/or during

the current study are not publicly available due to the confidentiality of the respondents’ information but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request for academic

purposes only. REFERENCES * Abid G, Contreras F, Ahmed S, Qazi T (2019) Contextual factors and organizational commitment: examining the mediating role of thriving at work. Sustainability

11(17):4686. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174686 Article  Google Scholar  * Adele B, Ellinger AD, McWhorter RR, Egan TM (2022) Exploring learning outcomes for managers who coach. Eur J Train

Dev. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-12-2021-0198 * Ahmad N, Ullah Z, AlDhaen E, Han H, Scholz M (2022) A CSR perspective to foster employee creativity in the banking sector: the role of work

engagement and psychological safety. J Retail Consum Serv 67:102968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102968 Article  Google Scholar  * Amabile TM (1998) How to kill creativity.

Harv Bus Rev 76:77–87 Google Scholar  * Basinska BA, Rozkwitalska M (2020) Psychological capital and happiness at work: the mediating role of employee thriving in multinational corporations.

Curr Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00598-y * Binder M, Blankenberg AK (2022) Identity and well-being in the skilled crafts and trades. Kyklos.

https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12289 * Bollen KA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons * Carmeli A, Spreitzer GM (2009) Trust, connectivity, and

thriving: implications for innovative behaviors at work. J Creat Behav 43(3):169–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01313.x Article  Google Scholar  * Carvalho C, Carvalho FK,

Carvalho S (2021) Managerial coaching: where are we now and where should we go in the future? Dev Learn Organ 36(1):4–7. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-01-2021-0020 Article  Google Scholar  *

Chang W, Busser JA (2020) Hospitality career retention: the role of contextual factors and thriving at work. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 32(1):193–211.

https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2018-0831 Article  Google Scholar  * Cohen E, Tichy N (1998) Teaching: the heart of leadership. Healthc Forum J 41(2):20–26 CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar  *

Ellinger AD, Bostrom RP (1999) Managerial coaching behaviors in learning organizations. J Manag Dev 18(9):752–771 Article  Google Scholar  * Ellinger AD, Ellinger AE (2021) Providing

strategic leadership for learning: optimizing managerial coaching to build learning organizations. Learn Organ. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-05-2020-0070 * Ellinger AD, Ellinger AE, Keller SB

(2003) Supervisory coaching behavior, employee satisfaction, and warehouse employee performance: a dyadic perspective in the distribution industry. Hum Resour Dev Q 14(4):435–458.

https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1078 Article  Google Scholar  * Farmer SM, Tierney P, Kung-Mcintyre K (2003) Employee creativity in Taiwan: an application of role identity theory. Acad Manag J

46(5):618–630. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040653 Article  Google Scholar  * Fried Y, Ferris GR (1987) The validity of the job characteristics model: a review and meta-analysis. Pers Psychol

40(2):287–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00605.x Article  Google Scholar  * Hackman JR, Oldham GR (1976) Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organ Behav

Hum Perform 16(2):250–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7 Article  Google Scholar  * Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2011) PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Mark Theory Pract

19(2):139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202 Article  Google Scholar  * Hayes A (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (methodology in

the social sciences). The Guilford Press, New York, NY . 978-1-60918-230-4 Google Scholar  * Humphrey SE, Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP (2007) Integrating motivational, social, and contextual

work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. J Appl Psychol 92(5):1332–1356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 Article 

PubMed  Google Scholar  * Hussain Z, Farid H, Liu X, Abbass Shaheen W (2022) Unveiling the effects of stressors on task performance: the role of thriving at work and resilience. Front

Psychol 13(May):1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896505 Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Jiang Z, Di Milia L, Jiang Y, Jiang X (2020) Thriving at work: a mentoring-moderated process

linking task identity and autonomy to job satisfaction. J Vocat Behav 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103373 * Jiang Z, Jiang Y, Nielsen I (2019) Workplace thriving in China. Int J

Manpow 40(5):979–993. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-08-2018-0256 Article  Google Scholar  * Kinoshita K, MacIntosh E, Sato S (2022) Thriving in youth sport: the antecedents and consequences.

Int J Sport Exerc Psychol 20(2):356–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2021.1877327 Article  Google Scholar  * Kleine A, Rudolph CW, Zacher H (2019) Thriving at work: a meta‐analysis. J

Organ Behav 40(9–10):973–999. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2375 Article  Google Scholar  * Kline RB, Kline RB (1998) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press,

New York MATH  Google Scholar  * Kline T (2005) Psychological testing: a practical approach to design and evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, United States.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385693 * Lee JY (2018) The effects of job characteristics on the team creativity of distribution companies: moderating effects of transformational leadership.

J Asian Finance Econ Bus 5(4):161–172. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2018.vol5.no4.161 Article  Google Scholar  * Li Z (2018) The influence of job autonomy on employee’s thriving at work:

an innovative theoretical framework. J Serv Sci Manag 11(06):618–630. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2018.116042 Article  Google Scholar  * Magson NR, Craven RG, Ryan RM, Dillon A, Mooney J,

Blacklock F, Franklin A (2022) A cross-cultural investigation of basic psychological need satisfaction at work in an Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Australian sample across occupation types.

J Cross Cult Psychol 53(2):213–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221211060441 Article  Google Scholar  * Morgeson FP, Humphrey SE (2006) The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and

validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. J Appl Psychol 91(6):1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321 Article  PubMed  Google

Scholar  * Muñoz-Pascual L, Galende J (2020) Ambidextrous knowledge and learning capability: the magic potion for employee creativity and sustainable innovation performance. Sustainability

12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12103966 * Ng TWH, Feldman DC (2012) Evaluating six common stereotypes about older workers with meta-analytical data. Pers Psychol 65(4):821–858.

https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12003 Article  Google Scholar  * Oldham GR, Hackman JR (1980) Work Design in the Organizational Context. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in

Organizational Behavior (Vol. 20 (pp. 247–278), Greenwich: JAI Press * Parker SK, Grote G (2022) Automation, algorithms, and beyond: why work design matters more than ever in a digital

world. Appl Psychol 71(4):1171–1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12241 Article  Google Scholar  * Peterson DB, Hicks MD (1996) Leader as coach. Personnel Decisions Inc, Minneapolis, MN

Google Scholar  * Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl

Psychol 88(5):879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Porath C, Spreitzer G, Gibson C, Garnett FG (2012) Thriving at work: toward its

measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. J Organ Behav 33(2):250–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.756 Article  Google Scholar  * Ravina-Ripoll R, Foncubierta-Rodríguez

MJ, López-Sánchez JA (2021) Certification happiness management: an integral instrument for human resources management in post-COVID-19 era. Int J Bus Environ 12(3):287–299.

https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBE.2021.116606 Article  Google Scholar  * Ravina-Ripoll R, Galvan-Vela E, Sorzano-Rodríguez DM, Ruíz-Corrales M (2022) Mapping intrapreneurship through the

dimensions of happiness at work and internal communication. Corp Commun Int J. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-03-2022-0037 * Ravina Ripoll R, Marchena Domínguez J, Montañés Del Rio MÁ (2019)

Happiness Management en la época de la Industria 4.0. Retos 9(18):189–202. https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n18.2019.01 Article  Google Scholar  * Raza B, Ali M, Ahmed S, Ahmad J (2018) Impact

of managerial coaching on organizational citizenship behavior: the mediation and moderation model. Int J Organ Leadersh 7(1):27–46. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2018.60360 Article  Google

Scholar  * Riaz S, Xu Y, Hussain S (2018) Understanding employee innovative behavior and thriving at work: a Chinese perspective. Adm Sci 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci8030046 * Ryan

RM, Deci EL (2020) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp Educ Psychol

61(Apr):101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 Article  Google Scholar  * Saks AM (2019) Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. J Organ Eff

6(1):19–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-06-2018-0034 Article  Google Scholar  * Shahid S, Muchiri MK, Walumbwa FO (2020) Mapping the antecedents and consequences of thriving at work. Int J

Organ Anal. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-09-2019-1881 * Shao Z, Li X, Wang Q (2022) From ambidextrous learning to digital creativity: an integrative theoretical framework. Inf Syst J

32(3):544–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12361 Article  Google Scholar  * Sims HP, Szilagyi AD, Keller RT (1976) The measurement of job characteristics. Acad Manag J 19(2):195–212.

https://doi.org/10.5465/255772 Article  Google Scholar  * Spreitzer GM, Porath C (2014) Self-determination as a nutriment for thriving: Building an integrative model of human growth at work.

In M. Gagné (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory (pp. 245–258). Oxford University Press * Spreitzer G, Sutcliffe K, Dutton J, Sonenshein

S, Grant AM (2005) A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organ Sci 16(5):537–549. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0153 Article  Google Scholar  * Wan Q, Li Z, Zhou W, Shang S

(2018) Effects of work environment and job characteristics on the turnover intention of experienced nurses: the mediating role of work engagement. J Adv Nurs 74(6):1332–1341.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13528 Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Wang Y-L (2013) R&D employees’ innovative behaviors in Taiwan: HRM and managerial coaching as moderators. Asia Pac J

Hum Resour 51:491–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7941.2012.00049.x Article  Google Scholar  * Wu C-M, Chen T-J (2019) Inspiring prosociality in hotel workplaces: roles of authentic

leadership, collective mindfulness, and collective thriving. Tour Manag Perspect 31(60):123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.04.002 Article  Google Scholar  * Yang Y, Li Z, Liang L,

Zhang X (2019) Why and when paradoxical leader behavior impact employee creativity: thriving at work and psychological safety. Curr Psychol 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0095-1 *

Zhang J, Bal PM, Akhtar MN, Long L, Zhang Y, Ma Z (2019) High-performance work system and employee performance: the mediating roles of social exchange and thriving and the moderating effect

of employee proactive personality. Asia Pac J Hum Resour 57(3):369–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12199 Article  Google Scholar  * Zhang R, Kang H, Jiang Z, Niu X (2022) How does

workplace ostracism hurt employee creativity? Thriving at work as a mediator and organization-based self-esteem as a moderator. Appl Psychol 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12374 *

Zhao H, Liu W (2020). Managerial coaching and subordinates’ workplace well-being: a moderated mediation study. Hum Resour Manag J. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12280 Download references

AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing, 211100, PR China Hasan Farid, Yang Zhang, Ming Tian & Shiyao Lu * Business School, University

of International Business and Economics, 100029, Beijing, PR China Jamshed Raza Authors * Hasan Farid View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar *

Yang Zhang View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ming Tian View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google

Scholar * Jamshed Raza View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Shiyao Lu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed 

Google Scholar CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Hasan Farid. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ETHICAL APPROVAL The author sought and

got ethical approval from Research Ethical Board Hohai University, Nanjing, China, and the study complied with ethical standards. INFORMED CONSENT The researcher sought and got the consent

of the participants to participate in the study. The researcher assured them of anonymity and that their responses will be solely used for academic purposes. We distributed 380

questionnaires and after matching employee-supervisor dyadic responses, we were able to proceed with 313 useful questionnaires for the analysis. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit

to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are

included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and

your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this

license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Farid, H., Zhang, Y., Tian, M. _et al._ Unveiling the job

characteristics-creativity rapport through the bridge of thriving: a self-determination perspective from the Chinese hospitality sector. _Humanit Soc Sci Commun_ 10, 412 (2023).

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01828-2 Download citation * Received: 22 September 2022 * Accepted: 31 May 2023 * Published: 13 July 2023 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01828-2

SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy

to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative