Diabetic vascular hyperpermeability: optical coherence tomography angiography and functional loss assessments of relationships among retinal vasculature changes

ABSTRACT Our study assessed the influence of vascular permeability on vascular flow density (FD)-correlated retinal sensitivity (RS) in DR. In this cross-sectional, prospective, consecutive

study, RS in the extrafoveal macula of DR patient was measured by microperimetry. FD was measured in the total, superficial, and deep capillary plexus layers (TCP, SCP, and DCP) by optical

coherence tomography angiography. All measurement points were classified into four categories according to intensity of fluorescein leakage and FD, and the RS reduction was compared. A

stratified analysis by retinal thickness (RT) was also performed. Fourteen eyes (14 patients) were enrolled. FDs at 207 RS measurement points were analyzable. For TCP, SCP and DCP, the

leakage did not decrease RS at points where FD was maintained. The greater the leakage, the smaller the RS reduction at points with low FD in TCP (_P_ = .020). Points with high leakage

showed a significant smaller RS reduction than points with low leakage (_P_ = .001 for TCP, _P_ = .040 for SCP, and _P_ = .046 for DCP) only in areas with low RT and low FD. Our results

suggested that vascular hyperpermeability may inhibit the RS reduction in the non-edematous ischemic diabetic retina. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS FLOW AND ISCHEMIC CHANGES IN

RETINA AND CHOROID ACROSS DIABETIC RETINOPATHY SPECTRUM: A SS-OCTA STUDY Article Open access 27 February 2025 CHORIORETINAL MICROVASCULAR CHANGES IN SLOW FLOW CORONARY PHENOMENON: A

MULTI-CENTER STUDY Article Open access 28 December 2024 DIFFERENTIATING FEATURES OF OCT ANGIOGRAPHY IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA Article Open access 03 December 2021 INTRODUCTION Diabetic

retinopathy (DR) is a major microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus and a leading cause of vision loss in working-age adults1,2. Vascular abnormalities, including

hyperpermeability-associated retinal edema and ischemia due to capillary loss, are involved in the pathogenesis of DR3, but how these abnormalities affect visual function in patients is

unclear. Retinal sensitivity (RS) is a common measure of visual function4. Fluorescein angiography (FA) studies have demonstrated significant reduction in RS in non-perfused areas5,6,

suggesting that perfusion status affects RS. Unlike FA, optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) allows quantification of flow density (FD)7: several studies have shown that FD is

associated with RS in DR8,9. Enhanced vascular permeability can cause retinal edema, followed by retinal neurodegeneration10. OCTA is a non-invasive alternative to FA; however, OCTA cannot

identify vascular leakage, which can occur regardless of perfusion11. Following a report of RS reduction in areas with greater leakage12, we hypothesized that the greatest RS reduction

occurs in areas with reduced blood perfusion and enhanced vascular permeability. To test our hypothesis, we used microperimetry to measure RS in patients with DR. We divided the measurement

points into four groups according to fluorescein leakage intensity and FD value, then compared RS reduction values among groups. Contrary to our expectations, the area with leakage showed

significantly less RS reduction in the area with reduced FD. Stratified analysis by retinal thickness (RT) showed that leakage could maintain RS only in areas where RT and FD were both low.

Although prolonged edema due to enhanced vascular permeability promotes impairment of visual function13, our results suggest that leakage may inhibit the RS reduction in the non-edematous

ischemic retina in patients with DR. METHODS This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of

Kyushu University Hospital (28-473, UMIN 000028656); written informed consent was obtained from all healthy volunteers as well as patients prior to participation in the study. PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional, prospective, comparative, consecutive case series included 14 eyes of 14 patients with DR who visited the Department of Ophthalmology, Kyushu University Hospital,

between February 2017 and January 2020. All patients underwent microperimetry, FA, OCT and OCTA on the same day. Given the poor fixation in patients with macular edema14, patients with

center-involving macular edema (central macular thickness ≥ 300 μm on OCT) were excluded. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy (intravitreal injection of ranibizumab 0.5 

mg) is administered to treat diabetic macular edema in our department. Because anti-VEGF agents influence retinal vascular permeability15, patients who had received anti-VEGF treatment in

the previous 34 days were excluded16. Other exclusion criteria were: active proliferative DR (PDR), other macular diseases, glaucoma, or ocular surgery within the previous 6 months. Six

healthy volunteers were included for determination of reference RS values. MICROPERIMETRY An MP-3 microperimeter (Nidek Co. Ltd, Aichi, Japan) was used for RS measurements. The stimulus

dynamic range was 0–34 dB. The background luminance was 31.4 asb, maximum luminance was 10,000 asb, and the stimulus was Goldmann size III. RS was measured in the upper or lower temporal

area of the macula (a 3 × 3-mm square with 25 points/patient; see Step 1 in Figure, Supplemental Figure 1, which demonstrates FD calculation and leakage evaluation). Only reliable data

(false-positive and false-negative rates < 33%) were analyzed. Measured values were corrected (based on RS values from six healthy volunteers) because RS decreases with increasing

eccentricity. The program for measurement of RS reference values is shown in Figure, Supplemental Figure 2A. RS values at 2-degree intervals were averaged and used as reference values (see

Figure, Supplemental Figure 2B, which demonstrates RS values in the healthy volunteers). The difference between measured and reference values was used as the corrected value for each test

location (see Figure, Supplemental Figure 2C, which demonstrates calculation of corrected values). FA IMAGING FA was performed using a Spectralis HRA (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg,

Germany). Late-phase images obtained within 7 min after dye injection were used to assess the extent of vascular leakage. OCTA IMAGING OCTA was performed as previously reported7,17, using a

Cirrus HD-OCT model 5000 (Carl Zeiss, Dublin, CA, USA); 3 × 3-mm images of the total, superficial and deep capillary plexus layers (TCP, SCP and DCP, respectively) of the retina were

acquired at the upper- or lower-temporal side of the macula, to avoid the foveal avascular zone. MEASUREMENT OF FD AND VASCULAR LEAKAGE The FA image was first merged with the MP-3 image, and

RS locations were marked (see Steps 1 and 2 in Figure, Supplemental Figure 1, which demonstrates calculation of FD and leakage). When the MP-3 image was deleted from the merged image, the

RS locations remained on the FA image (see Step 3 in Figure, Supplemental Figure 1). The OCTA image was merged with this image; a 500-µm-diameter circle was drawn around each dot for FD

measurement (see Step 4 in Figure, Supplemental Figure 1). In Supplemental Figure 1, the leftmost 5 points were excluded because 500-µm-diameter circles could not be drawn at those points;

the remaining 20 points were included in the analysis. FD was measured as previously reported7,17 (see “Analysis 1”, Step 4, in Figure, Supplemental Figure 1). In brief, OCTA images were

binarized using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The vessel area within the circle was calculated; the value of the vessel area/circle area was used as the FD at

each location. Points at which the FD of the TCP was ≤ 0.07 were regarded as the “low” group7. That designation allowed investigation of the effects of leakage on RS in perfused and

non-perfused areas. For SCP and DCP, points below the median were regarded as the “low” group. Finally, the OCTA image was erased from the merged FA-OCTA image, and the image with the circle

on the FA was created (see Step 5 in Figure, Supplemental Figure 1). Two retinal specialists (MA and YK) independently evaluated the leakage. In case of disagreement, a third observer (SN)

evaluated leakage intensity. Leakage in the circle was considered “low” if its brightness was below that of the nearby vessels and “high” if its brightness was equal or greater (see

“Analysis 2”, Step 5 in Figure, Supplemental Figure 1). OCT IMAGING Central macular thickness was measured with the Cirrus HD-OCT model 5000, as was the retinal thickness (RT) between the

retinal pigment epithelium and the inner limiting membrane at each RS location. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS All values are presented as means ± standard deviations. The data were analyzed using

non-parametric statistics. R software version 3.6.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) was used to calculate Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and

corresponding 95% confidence intervals. JMP Pro version 14 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for other analyses (Steel–Dwass test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test). The

smoothing curve in scatterplots of RT versus RS was obtained using locally weighted scatterplot smoothing regression. _P_ values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS

PATIENTS Fourteen patients were enrolled in the study. Data from two patients were excluded because poor eye fixation prevented acquisition of analyzable OCTA images. Although 300 RS

measurements were collected (25 locations × 12 patients), FD could only be measured for 207 measurements. The characteristics of the 12 patients are shown in Table 1. IMPACT OF VASCULAR

LEAKAGE ON THE CORRELATION BETWEEN FD AND RS REDUCTION A significant association between FD and RS in the diabetic macula was previously reported18. Similarly, FD values in the TCP, SCP and

DCP were significantly correlated with RS in our study (Fig. 1). To investigate whether leakage affected this correlation, we divided all points into two groups, by their degree of leakage

(“high” or “low”), and re-examined the correlation between FD and RS. Leakage did not impact the correlation in the DCP, but the correlation between FD and RS tended to be weaker in the

high-leakage group than in the low-leakage group for TCP and SCP (see Figure, Supplemental Fig. 3, which demonstrates the impact of leakage on correlations between RS reduction and FD; Table

2). These results suggest that leakage could affect the FD–RS relationship in the TCP and SCP, but not the DCP. CLASSIFICATION OF POINTS ACCORDING TO FD AND LEAKAGE The RS locations were

divided into four groups, according to the degrees of FD and leakage, for further analysis of the influence of leakage on the FD–RS relationship. We defined points with high FD and low

leakage as group A, points with low FD and high leakage as group B, points with high FD and high leakage as group C, and points with low FD and high leakage as group D (see Table 3). RS

REDUCTIONS AMONG THE FOUR GROUPS Figure 2 compares RS reductions among the groups. For TCP, the RS reduction values were − 3.9 ± 4.1 dB, − 14.2 ± 11.2 dB, − 4.6 ± 4.8 dB, and − 6.0 ± 5.4 dB

in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. At locations with low leakage, RS reduction was significantly greater in the low-FD group than in the high-FD group (group A vs. group B, _P_ < 

0.0001). However, in groups with high leakage, there was no significant difference in RS reduction between points with low FD and high FD (group C vs. group D, _P_ = 0.21). At locations

where FD was high, the degree of leakage did not influence RS reduction (group A vs. group C, _P_ = 0.95). Conversely, at locations where FD was low, RS reduction was significantly smaller

in the high-leakage group than in the low-leakage group (group B vs. group D, _P_ = 0.02). For SCP, the RS reductions were − 3.4 ± 2.3 dB, − 11.4 ± 10.9 dB, − 4.3 ± 4.0 dB, and − 6.2 ± 6.0 

dB in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. RS reduction was significantly greater in the low-FD group with low leakage than in the high-FD group with low leakage (group A vs. group B, _P_ = 

0.007). For DCP, the RS reductions were − 4.2 ± 4.5 dB, − 12.5 ± 11.3 dB, − 3.6 ± 4.3 dB, and − 6.4 ± 5.3 dB in groups A, B, C and D, respectively. RS reduction in DCP was significantly

greater in the low-FD group at locations with either low leakage (_P_ = 0.004) or high leakage (_P_ = 0.0004). At locations where FD was high, the degree of leakage did not influence RS

reduction (group A vs. group C, _P_ = 0.51). Likewise, where FD was low, the degree of leakage did not influence RS reduction (group B vs. group D, _P_ = 0.33). EFFECT OF RT ON RS REDUCTION

We started by measuring RT at all 207 points. There were no points with subretinal fluid that could affect RS in these patients19. Scatterplots of RT versus RS (Fig. 3) show a weak

correlation between RT and RS. Consistent with previous reports20,21, RS reduction in our patients tended to decrease with increasing RT, until the RT reached approximately 300 μm; RS

reduction tended to increase with increasing RT when the RT exceeded approximately 300 μm. Considering the effect of RT on RS, we performed a stratified analysis. POSSIBLE SUPPRESSION OF RS

REDUCTION BY VASCULAR LEAKAGE All measurements were divided into two groups: locations where RT values exceeded the median (261 μm) and those where RTs were less than or equal to the median.

Locations were then subdivided according to high or low FD. The results of analyses using high-RT and low-RT locations are shown in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. In the high-RT group,

vascular leakage did not influence RS reduction, regardless of whether FD was high or low (Table 4). In the low-RT group, RS reduction was unaffected by vascular leakage at points with high

FD but was affected at points with low FD (Table 5). RS reduction was significantly smaller at points with high leakage than at points with low leakage in the TCP, SCP and DCP subgroups

(Table 5). COMPARISONS OF RT AMONG GROUPS RT values in the four groups, classified by FD and leakage levels, are shown in Figure, Supplemental Figure 4. For TCP, the RT values were 263 ± 34 

μm, 245 ± 68 μm, 312 ± 80 μm, and 301 ± 102 μm in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. For SCP, the RT values were 268 ± 34 μm, 247 ± 59 μm, 318 ± 79 μm, and 296 ± 100 μm in groups A, B, C,

and D, respectively. For DCP, the RS values were 259 ± 34 μm, 253 ± 66 μm, 287 ± 56 μm, and 323 ± 106 μm in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. For TCP and SCP, the RT values were

significantly greater in group C than in group A (_P_ = 0.02 and _P_ = 0.02, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups C and D in any layers. For DCP, the RT was

significantly greater in group D than in group B (_P_ = 0.005). For TCP and SCP, the RTs were significantly greater in group C than in group A (_P_ = 0.02 and _P_ = 0.003, respectively).

DISCUSSION Our data show that RS reduction was inhibited under certain conditions, in patients with DR, even with reduced vascular flow. In areas without significant edema, RS was maintained

in areas with vascular leakage, compared with faint or no leakage, despite capillary dropout. In DR, vascular permeability is enhanced owing to disruption of the inner blood-retinal barrier

(BRB) because of ischemia, inflammation and oxidative stress22,23,24. Disruption of BRB function leads to accumulation of retinal fluid and influx of harmful substances into the retina,

which lead to irreversible degeneration of neurons, including photoreceptors10. VEGF plays a major role in BRB disruption23,25,26. Several clinical trials have demonstrated significant

improvement in visual acuity with continued anti-VEGF therapy in patients with DR13,27,28, so vascular hyperpermeability is generally considered an “unfavorable” phenomenon, which should be

suppressed. Our study did not show that leakage negatively influenced RS, which raises the question of why leaky retina retained more RS, than did less-leaky retina, in low-FD areas. Where

it has not completely lost RS, the retina may develop vascular leakage though VEGF secretion. To our knowledge, there have been no reports that leakage positively influences retinal

function. Elucidating the multifaceted role of vascular leakage may help clarify the pathogenesis of DR, including the pattern of neurodegeneration. In the context of our results, we cannot

exclude the possibility that anti-VEGF therapy caused side effects on the neuronal retina under certain circumstances29. Because reduced RS around the fovea can lead to poor vision quality,

other therapies might be necessary, such as steroid treatment for patients with non-edematous ischemic diabetic retina2. However, further studies are needed to identify the patients in whom

anti-VEGF therapy should be cautiously administered. As previously reported18, there was a correlation between FD decline and RS reduction in DR in our study. Because RS decreases in areas

with greater vascular leakage12, we investigated whether leakage affected the relationship between FD and RS. In the TCP and SCP, the strength of the correlation changed depending on the

extent of leakage, suggesting that leakage influences the correlation between FD and RS. We did not observe a significant impact of leakage on the correlation in the DCP. Spaide et al.

showed that FA does not image the DCP30; thus, DCP leakage may not be completely detected by FA. As leakage altered the correlation between FD and RS, we speculated that leakage in

non-perfused areas might lead to the greatest RS reduction. Therefore, we categorized all RS locations into four groups, based on FD and leakage. At points where leakage was low, RS

decreased when FD decreased (group A vs. group B; _P_ < 0.0001, _P_ < 0.007 and _P_ < 0.004 in TCP, SCP and DCP, respectively), as previously reported9,16. However, contrary to

expectations, at points with high leakage, FD only significantly affected RS in the DCP (group C vs. group D; _P_ < 0.0004). Previous reports have shown that reduced blood flow in the DCP

contributes to disruption of the outer retinal layer and reduction in RS31,32. Reduced perfusion in the deep layer may be more likely to affect RS. Leakage did not lead to RS reduction at

locations where FD values were maintained (group A vs. group C). Notably, at low-FD points in the TCP, leakage significantly inhibited the reduction in RS (group B vs. group D; _P_ = 0.02).

These results indicated that our hypothesis was incorrect and suggested that leakage may not be uniformly "unfavorable." We subsequently investigated whether leakage could suppress

RS reduction. RT and RS are not linearly correlated because edema causes loss of visual function33. Analysis of our high-RT group revealed no significant difference in RS reductions between

areas of high and low leakage. However, analysis of the low-RT group revealed that leakage significantly inhibited the reduction in RS. These results suggest that the retina, which

undergoes atrophy due to DR, can maintain RS despite leakage. We could not show that vascular leakage adversely affected RS. A comparison of RT values between groups is shown in Figure,

Supplemental Figure 4. In all analyses, group B had the lowest RT. As shown in Fig. 2, group B showed the greatest reduction in RS; however, RS reduction exhibited polarization. Based on

these results, we considered the following hypotheses regarding RS reduction (see Figure, Supplemental Figure 5): 1) Edema is formed at points with normal FD and high leakage (group A to C).

Then, circulatory disturbances by edema exacerbate ischemia (group C to D) and eventually promote retinal atrophy (group D to B). 2) After ischemia reduces FD (group A to B), leakage

increases (group B to D) and edema occurs. Cellular damage and further edema-related circulatory disturbances lead to retinal atrophy (groups D to B). 3) If the degree of ischemia is severe,

the retina may atrophy without enhanced vascular permeability or edema (group A to B). The lack of consideration of the time since DR onset was a limitation of this study. Leakage may not

have had an "unfavorable" effect on RS because DR duration was not considered. Longitudinal studies are needed to follow patients over time and elucidate pathways that lead to

neurodegeneration. Because patients with center-involved macular edema or PDR were excluded from our study population, the associations of vascular permeability with FD, RT, and RS observed

in this study may not be generalizable to all patients with DR. Furthermore, our study included a small sample of patients, although the number of RS measurements was high. In conclusion,

vascular leakage in non-perfused areas suppressed the reduction in RS in eyes with DR. Our results suggest that vascular leakage has a negative impact in terms of damaging the retina; it

also has a positive impact in terms of preserving ischemic retinal function. CHANGE HISTORY * _ 07 JUNE 2021 A Correction to this paper has been published:

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91789-w _ REFERENCES * Cheung, N., Mitchell, P. & Wong, T. Y. Diabetic retinopathy. _Lancet_ 376, 124–136 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  * Terasaki,

H. _et al._ Management of diabetic macular edema in Japan: A review and expert opinion. _Jpn. J. Ophthalmol._ 62, 1–23 (2018). Article  Google Scholar  * Duh, E. J., Sun, J. K. & Stitt,

A. W. Diabetic retinopathy: Current understanding, mechanisms, and treatment strategies. _JCI Insight_ 2, 1–13 (2017). Article  Google Scholar  * Rohrschneider, K., Bültmann, S. &

Springer, C. Use of fundus perimetry (microperimetry) to quantify macular sensitivity. _Prog. Retin. Eye Res._ 27, 536–548 (2008). Article  Google Scholar  * Bek, T. & Lund-Andersen, H.

Localised blood-retinal barrier leakage and retinal light sensitivity in diabetic retinopathy. _Br. J. Ophthalmol._ 74, 388–392 (1990). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Chee, C. K. L. &

Flanagan, D. W. Visual field loss with capillary non-perfusion in preproliferative and early proliferative diabetic retinopathy. _Br. J. Ophthalmol._ 77, 726–730 (1993). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Kaizu, Y. _et al._ Retinal flow density by optical coherence tomography angiography is useful for detection of nonperfused areas in diabetic retinopathy. _Graefes Arch. Clin.

Exp. Ophthalmol._ 256, 2275–2282 (2018). Article  Google Scholar  * Montesano, G. _et al._ Structure-function relationship in early diabetic retinopathy: A spatial correlation analysis with

OCT and microperimetry. _Eye (Lond)._ 31, 931–939 (2017). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Alonso-Plasencia, M., Abreu-González, R. & Gómez-Culebras, M. A. Structure–function correlation

using OCT angiography and microperimetry in diabetic retinopathy. _Clin. Ophthalmol._ 13, 2181–2188 (2019). Article  Google Scholar  * Das, A., McGuire, P. G. & Rangasamy, S. Diabetic

macular edema: Pathophysiology and novel therapeutic targets. _Ophthalmology_ 122, 1375–1394 (2015). Article  Google Scholar  * Spaide, R. F. _et al._ Optical coherence tomography

angiography. _Prog. Retin. Eye Res._ 64, 1–55 (2018). Article  Google Scholar  * Soliman, W., Hasler, P., Sander, B. & Larsen, M. Local retinal sensitivity in relation to specific

retinopathy lesions in diabetic macular oedema. _Acta Ophthalmol._ 90, 248–253 (2012). Article  Google Scholar  * Heier, J. S. _et al._ Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema:

148-week results from the VISTA and VIVID studies. _Ophthalmology_ 123, 2376–2385 (2016). Article  Google Scholar  * Vujosevic, S. _et al._ Retinal fixation impairment in diabetic macular

edema. _Retina_ 28, 1443–1450 (2008). Article  Google Scholar  * Özkiriş, A. Intravitreal bevacizumab (avastin) for primary treatment of diabetic macular oedema. _Eye (Lond)._ 23, 616–618

(2009). Article  Google Scholar  * Fauser, S. & Muether, P. S. Clinical correlation to differences in ranibizumab and aflibercept vascular endothelial growth factor suppression times.

_Br. J. Ophthalmol._ 100, 1494–1498 (2016). Article  Google Scholar  * Kaizu, Y. _et al._ Optical coherence tomography angiography reveals spatial bias of macular capillary dropout in

diabetic retinopathy. _Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci._ 58, 4889–4897 (2017). Article  Google Scholar  * Tsai, A. S. H. _et al._ Diabetic macular ischemia: correlation of retinal vasculature

changes by optical coherence tomography angiography and functional deficit. _Retina_ https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002721 (2019). Article  PubMed  Google Scholar  * Deák, G. G. _et

al._ A systematic correlation between morphology and functional alterations in diabetic macular edema. _Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis Sci._ 51, 6710–6714 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  *

Hatef, E. _et al._ The relationship between macular sensitivity and retinal thickness in eyes with diabetic macular edema. _Am. J. Ophthalmol._ 152, 400-405.e2 (2011). Article  Google

Scholar  * Yohannan, J. _et al._ Association of retinal sensitivity to integrity of photoreceptor inner/outer segment junction in patients with diabetic macular edema. _Ophthalmology_ 120,

1254–1261 (2013). Article  Google Scholar  * Tang, J. & Kern, T. S. Inflammation in diabetic retinopathy. _Prog. Retin. Eye Res._ 30, 343–358 (2011). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  *

Klaassen, I., Van Noorden, C. J. F. & Schlingemann, R. O. Molecular basis of the inner blood-retinal barrier and its breakdown in diabetic macular edema and other pathological

conditions. _Prog. Retin. Eye Res._ 34, 19–48 (2013). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Arima, M. _et al._ Claudin-5 redistribution induced by inflammation leads to anti-VEGF resistant

diabetic macular edema. _Diabetes_ 69, 981–999 (2020). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Murakami, T., Felinski, E. A. & Antonetti, D. A. Occludin phosphorylation and ubiquitination

regulate tight junction trafficking and vascular endothelial growth factor-induced permeability. _J. Biol. Chem._ 284, 21036–21046 (2009). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Aiello, L. P. _et

al._ Vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular fluid of patients with diabetic retinopathy and other retinal disorders. _N. Engl. J. Med._ 331, 1480–1487 (1994). Article  CAS  Google

Scholar  * Nguyen, Q. D. _et al._ Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 phase III randomized trials: RISE and RIDE. _Ophthalmology_ 119, 789–801 (2012). Article  Google

Scholar  * Iesato, Y. _et al._ Effect of leaking capillaries and microaneurysms in the perifoveal capillary network on resolution of macular edema by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor

treatment. _Jpn. J. Ophthalmol._ 60, 86–94 (2016). Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Saint-Geniez, M. _et al._ Endogenous VEGF is required for visual function: evidence for a survival role on

Müller cells and photoreceptors. _PLoS ONE_ 3, e3554 (2008). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Spaide, R. F., Klancnik, J. M. Jr. & Cooney, M. J. Retinal vascular layers imaged by

fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography. _JAMA Ophthalmol._ 133, 45–50 (2015). Article  Google Scholar  * Scarinci, F., Nesper, P. L. & Fawzi, A. A. Deep

retinal capillary nonperfusion is associated with photoreceptor disruption in diabetic macular ischemia. _Am J Ophthalmol._ 168, 129–138 (2016). Article  Google Scholar  * Scarinci, F.,

Varano, M. & Parravano, M. Retinal sensitivity loss correlates with deep capillary plexus impairment in diabetic macular ischemia. _J. Ophthalmol._ 2019, 7589841 (2019). Article  Google

Scholar  * Vujosevic, S. _et al._ Diabetic macular edema with and without subfoveal neuroretinal detachment: two different morphologic and functional entities. _Am. J. Ophthalmol._ 181,

149–155 (2017). Article  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 19K18846 to M. Arima and 20K09829 to S. Nakao, and The

Foundation for The Advancement of Clinical Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan to S. Nakao. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of

the manuscript. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan Mitsuru Arima, Shintaro

Nakao, Yoshihiro Kaizu, Iori Wada, Muneo Yamaguchi, Kohta Fujiwara, Masato Akiyama & Koh-Hei Sonoda * Department of Ophthalmology, National Kyushu Medical Center, 1-8-1, Jigyo-hama,

Chuo-ku, Fukuoka, 8108563, Japan Shintaro Nakao * Department of Ophthalmology, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan Muneo Yamaguchi * Centre for Experimental Medicine,

Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland Alan W. Stitt Authors * Mitsuru Arima View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Shintaro

Nakao View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Yoshihiro Kaizu View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google

Scholar * Iori Wada View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Muneo Yamaguchi View author publications You can also search for this author

inPubMed Google Scholar * Kohta Fujiwara View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Masato Akiyama View author publications You can also search

for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Alan W. Stitt View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Koh-Hei Sonoda View author publications You can

also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS S.N. designed this study with M.A. M.A., S.N., Y.K., I.W. and M.Y. collected data. M.A., K.F. and M.A. performed data

analysis. With critical assistance from A.W.S. and K.H..S., M.A. and S.N. wrote the manuscript. All authors provided the approval of the final manuscript version. We thank Editage

(www.editage.com) for English language editing. We also thank Claire Barnes, Ph.D., and Ryan Chastain-Gross, PhD, from Edanz Group (https://en-author-services.edanzgroup.com/ac) for editing

a draft of this manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Shintaro Nakao. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS S. Nakao: consulting fee by Kowa; travel reimbursements and speaker

fees by Novartis, Bayer Pharma, Canon Inc., Santen Pharmaceutical, Kowa, Senju Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, and MSD. K.H. Sonoda: consulting fees by Kowa, JT, and AbbVie; travel

reimbursements and speaker fees by Novartis, Bayer Pharma, Canon Inc., Santen Pharmaceutical, Kowa, Senju Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, HOYA, Wakamoto, AMO, Alcon, Otsuka

Pharmaceutical, AbbVie Eisai, Nidek, Topcon, Novo Nordisk, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, and Astellas. The following authors have no financial disclosures: M. Arima,

Y. Kaizu, I. Wada, M. Yamaguchi, K. Fujiwara, M. Akiyama, and A.W. Stitt. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER'S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in

published maps and institutional affiliations. The original online version of this Article was revised: The original PDF version of this Article contained an error in Table 3, where a

heading in the subcategory “Classification method” was incorrect. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 1. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit

to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are

included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons

licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of

this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Arima, M., Nakao, S., Kaizu, Y. _et al._ Diabetic vascular

hyperpermeability: optical coherence tomography angiography and functional loss assessments of relationships among retinal vasculature changes. _Sci Rep_ 11, 4185 (2021).

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83334-6 Download citation * Received: 24 October 2020 * Accepted: 17 December 2020 * Published: 18 February 2021 * DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83334-6 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not

currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative