High strength and low swelling composite hydrogels from gelatin and delignified wood

Download PDF Article Open access Published: 20 October 2020 High strength and low swelling composite hydrogels from gelatin and delignified wood Shennan Wang1,2, Kai Li1,2 & Qi Zhou1,2 

Scientific Reports volume 10, Article number: 17842 (2020) Cite this article

6437 Accesses

29 Citations

5 Altmetric

Metrics details

A delignified wood template with hydrophilic characteristics and high porosity was obtained by removal of lignin. Gelatin was infiltrated into the delignified wood and further crosslinked

with a natural crosslinker genipin to form hydrogels. The composite hydrogels showed high mechanical strength under compression and low swelling in physiological condition. The effect of

genipin concentrations (1, 50 and 100 mM) on structure and properties of the composite hydrogels were studied. A porous honeycomb structure with tunable pore size and porosity was observed

in the freeze-dried composite hydrogels. High elastic modulus of 11.82 ± 1.51 MPa and high compressive yield stress of 689.3 ± 34.9 kPa were achieved for the composite hydrogel with a water

content as high as 81%. The equilibrium water uptake of the freeze-dried hydrogel in phosphate buffered saline at 37 °C was as low as 407.5%. These enables the delignified wood structure an

excellent template in composite hydrogel preparation by using infiltration and in-situ synthesis, particularly when high mechanical strength and stiffness are desired.

being viewed by others Simultaneous/direct chemomechanical densification and downsizing of weak paulownia wood to produce a strong, unidirectional, all-wooden nanocomposite Article 02 March

2023 Wood xerogel for fabrication of high-performance transparent wood Article Open access 17 May 2023 Facile fabrication of a novel self-healing and flame-retardant hydrogel/MXene coating

for wood Article Open access 01 February 2023 Introduction

Recently, utilizing the inherent nanocellulose fibril orientation, anisotropic tissue organization and cellular structure in wood, synthetic polymers and inorganic materials have been

introduced into delignified wood to generate composites with transparency, electrical conductivity, and novel functions for applications in load-bearing materials, environmental remediation,

actuators, solar steam generation, etc.1,2,3,4. Wood-based hydrogels have also been synthesized by filling the micro channels of delignified wood with the polyacrylamide (PAM) hydrogel

precursor followed by free-radical polymerization5. The wood/PAM hydrogel demonstrated remarkably enhanced fracture tensile strength and modulus as compared to the PAM hydrogel owing to the

skeletons of natural aligned cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) and the strong interfacial hydrogen bonding in the hydrogel. This top-down approach opened up a new way to synthesize strong

hydrogels exploiting the advantages of the cellular structure with highly aligned CNFs bundles in the cell walls in delignified wood, which provides not only mechanical support but also

liquid conduction through the natural aligned micro and nano channels.

Gelatin is a mixture of peptide hydrolysed from collagen and has been widely used in food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries as a stabilizing ingredient since it is non-toxic,

biocompatible, and biodegradable. In tissue engineering and biomedicine, gelatin-based hydrogels with porous network structures can provide an ideal environment for cells attachment and

promote their colonization, migration and proliferation6,7,8. The gelation of mammalian and warm-water fish gelatin in aqueous solution occurs at temperature below 25 °C due to physical

folding of the polypeptide backbone, i.e. the single-strand to triple-helix transition of gelatin chains. The gelling temperature of cold-water fish gelatin is even lower, at around 10 

°C9,10. This gelation process is reversible as the temperature increases to 37 °C. To avoid the dissolution of gelatin at the physiological temperatures, chemical or enzymatic crosslinking

is usually employed11,12,13. Conventional synthetic crosslinking reagents such as glutaraldehyde, diisocyanates, and carbodiimides, as well as genipin, a natural crosslinker with low acute

toxicity, have been used for gelatin crosslinking. However, the poor mechanical performance and high swelling ratio of gelatin largely limit the application of gelatin hydrogels.

The strategies to substantially improve mechanical properties of hydrogel include hybridization with nanomaterials or incorporation of multiple components with different crosslinking

mechanisms involving chemical bonding and physical entanglement14. Various matrixes, either organic or inorganic, have been hybridized with gelatin to improve its mechanical and thermal

performance15,16,17,18,19. For example, crosslinked porous gelatin/chitosan scaffolds with controllable mechanical properties for load bearing soft tissues have been prepared using

genipin20. Formation of interpenetrating network (IPN) and semi-IPN structures in gelatin/chitosan hydrogels could also enhance the mechanical properties. Gelatin was modified with

methacrylic anhydride and covalently crosslinked by ultraviolet light radiation, while chitosan was crosslinked by hydrophobic interactions at high pH19. Gelatin/alginate hydrogels with IPN

structures by chemical crosslinking of gelatin with genipin or carbodiimide together with ionic crosslinking of alginate with calcium or zinc ions have also been prepared. The hydrogel was

further reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) and demonstrated good mechanical properties comparable to natural cartilage21,22. Dialdehyde CNCs prepared by sodium periodate oxidation

was able to crosslink gelatin to form hydrogel with improved mechanical properties and thermal stability23. CNFs have also been dispersed into crosslinked gelatin/chitosan matrix to

fabricate 3D porous scaffolds by freeze-drying24. The scaffolds demonstrated high porosity and viscoelasticity when immersed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Bacterial cellulose

(BC)/gelatin composite hydrogels crosslinked with N-(3-dimethy-laminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride have also showed significant enhancement in mechanical strength and stiffness

owing to the natural ultrafine-fibre network structures of BC25,26,27. The fracture stress and elastic modulus of BC/gelatin hydrogel under compression were reported to be 3.7 MPa and 1.7 

MPa with water content of 82.8 wt%, respectively27. The interfacial interaction and bonding between cellulose and gelatin and the formation of CNF network structure are important to the

mechanical properties of gelatin/CNFs hydrogels. To further increase their mechanical properties while maintaining high water content (> 80 wt%), the formation of oriented structure of

aligned CNFs in the hydrogel is highly desirable. However, this is rather challenging and requires shear-induced alignment when using CNFs by bottom-up assembly approaches28,29.

In this work, delignified wood with inherently aligned CNFs and native porous cell wall structure is used as mechanical reinforcement and structural confinement for gelatin hydrogels, aiming

to enhance the compressive mechanical properties of gelatin hydrogel as well as decreasing its swelling under physiological condition. Composite hydrogels from delignified wood and gelatin

have been prepared by infiltration of gelatin followed by chemical crosslinking with genipin at different concentrations and characterized in terms of structural features (porosity and pore

size), molecular configuration, mechanical properties and swelling behaviour. As illustrated in Fig. 1, lignin was removed from wood structure and the cellular structure with inherent CNFs

alignment in the cell wall was preserved. Gelatin was infiltrated in the channels of the delignified wood and crosslinked by genipin. The microstructure of the delignified wood/gelatin

composite hydrogels was characterized by optical microscopy and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). The compressive mechanical properties and the swelling behaviour of the

composite hydrogels were studied.

Schematic illustration for the preparation of delignified wood/gelatin composite hydrogel.

Balsa wood was delignified by using 1 wt% sodium chlorite at 80 °C. The main functional substance in sodium chlorite delignification is chlorine dioxide, which has been widely used for

disinfection, sterilization in food and medical application owing to its low toxicity. The delignified wood was washed intensively with deionized water before the infiltration of gelatin.

Delignified wood showed a white colour (Fig. 2a) as most of lignin and chromophores have been removed from the wood structure. This was further confirmed by the disappearing of

lignin-attributed peaks30 at 1596 cm−1 (symmetric ring stretching), 1504 cm−1 (asymmetric ring stretching) and 1464 cm−1 (asymmetric C–H deformation) in the ATR-FTIR spectrum of delignified

wood as compared to the original Balsa wood (Fig. 3). Besides, hemicelluloses remained in the delignified wood as indicated by the peak at 1730 cm−1 corresponding to the C=O stretching

frequency of carbonyl groups in hemicellulose.

Photographs of (a) delignified wood, (b) gelatin and (c) delignified wood/gelatin hydrogel. (d) SEM image of freeze-dried delignified wood, showing the well-preserved cellular structure. (e)

Optical microscopy image of delignified wood/gelatin composite hydrogel in wet state with initial gelatin and genipin concentrations of 30 wt% and 100 mM.

ATR-FTIR spectra of original wood, delignified wood, neat gelatin and delignified wood/gelatin hydrogel crosslinked with genipin at different concentrations in the range of (a) 4000 to 800 

cm-1 and (b) 3700 to 3100 cm-1 and 1600 to 1400 cm-1.

The crosslinking strategies significantly impact the structure and properties of gelatin-based hydrogel31,32. The complete gelation of gelatin (37.5 wt%) was achieved within 35 min at 37 °C

when 1 wt% (44 mM) genipin was used as a crosslinker33. However, the complete infiltration of gelatin into porous delignified wood structure takes much longer time. To avoid gelling, gelatin

from bovine skin was first infiltrated into the delignified wood at 50 °C for one week. The composites were then kept overnight at 4 °C, which is below the upper critical solution

temperature of gelatin, to allow physical gelation of gelatin. Subsequently, the composite hydrogels were further chemically crosslinked in a genipin solution for 48 h, to assure complete

crosslinking of infiltrated gelatin in the composite. The initial genipin concentration and the compositions of gelatin, delignified wood, and water in the resulting composite hydrogels are

summarized in Table 1. The delignified wood/gelatin composite hydrogels with water content of around 81 wt% were successfully prepared. The water content was lower than those for neat

gelatin hydrogel due to the interaction between gelatin and delignified wood and the structural confinement provided by the wood cell wall structure as evidenced by FTIR analysis and

swelling behaviour discussed in latter sections. Nonetheless, a highly hydrated network (water content > 80 wt%) was maintained in the composite hydrogels, which is of great interests for

ultra-stiff/strong hydrogel preparation34. Both gelatin hydrogel and the delignified wood/gelatin hydrogels showed a dark blue colour (Fig. 2b,c) indicating the successful chemical

crosslinking of gelatin by genipin. This characteristic colour is typically observed for dyeing in food, textile, and tattoo when the amine groups are crosslinked with genipin. Infiltration

of gelatin into the lumen of the wood structure was confirmed by the microscopy observation (Fig. 2d,e). This was further confirmed by FTIR analysis (Fig. 3). The absorption band at 1527 

cm-1 in neat gelatin was ascribed to NH bending (amide II). The shift of the amide II band from 1527 to 1540 cm-1 (Fig. 3b) was observed in delignified wood/gelatin hydrogels, indicating

that the presence of delignified wood prevented the formation of β-sheet structure, resulting in more random coil to α-helix structure during the physical folding of gelatin in cooling

process35. The peak at 897 cm-1 (Fig. 3a) is originated from the CH deformation at C1 position associated with C–O–C stretching of the β-glycosidic linkages in cellulose and hemicellulose36.

The intensity of the shoulder peak at 897 cm-1 in the composite hydrogels decreased with increasing crosslinking density at higher genipin concentrations, which indicating an increased

hydrogen bonding between gelatin and delignified wood. Indeed, the broadening of the OH stretching vibration region centred at 3340 cm-1 (Fig. 3b) and the NH stretching of hydrogen-bonded

amide group

at 3300 cm-1 was observed for the composite hydrogel with increasing genipin concentration37. The peaks at 3080 and 2940 cm-1 (Fig. 3a) were attributed to the CH3 stretching and CH2

stretching of amide B structure, respectively38. The relative intensity between 3080 to 2940 cm-1 (I3080/I2940) of genipin crosslinked delignified wood/gelatin composite was higher than the

neat gelatin, indicating stronger entanglement in the gelatin network.

hydrogels.Full size table

The effect of genipin concentrations on the morphology and pore structure of delignified wood/gelatin hydrogels was further studied by FE-SEM (Fig. 4) using freeze-dried samples. Their pore

size and porosity data are summarized in Table 2. As shown in Fig. 4a, the cross section of delignified balsa wood possessed a honeycomb-like structure which is composed of hollow fiber

cells with diameters between 20 and 50 μm. Nano- and micron-scale pores were observed in both cell walls and cell wall corners (Fig. 4b), and a total porosity of 93.4 ± 0.6% was obtained.

Such porous structure allowed the penetration of gelatin into the cell wall structure and facilitated the interaction of gelatin with cellulose and hemicellulose in delignified wood. The

fixation of gelatin in delignified wood was enabled by chemical crosslinking with genipin. When only 1 mM genipin solution was applied, the composite hydrogel shows similar macroscopic

structure as delignified wood (Fig. 4c). Due to the low initial concentration of genipin, network structure of gelatin did not form in the lumens. Gelatin was mainly adsorbed onto the

surface of lumens and infiltrated into the cell wall and cell wall corners, resulting in a decreased porosity of 83.7 ± 0.2%. Indeed, smooth surface was observed at both cell wall and cell

wall corners (Fig. 4d). When the genipin concentration was increased to 50 mM, gelatin network was formed within lumens and showed a pore size of 6.0 ± 1.2 μm (Fig. 4e,f). As the

concentration of genipin was increased to 100 mM, denser gelatin network was clearly observed in lumens (Fig. 4g,h), and the crosslinked gelatin aerogel exhibits a porous structure with

relatively smaller pore size of 2.3 ± 0.5 μm. Consequently, the total porosity of delignified wood/gelatin hydrogel decreased to 72.7 ± 0.3% and 69.0 ± 0.2% when 50 and 100 mM genipin were

applied, respectively. Beyond short-range crosslinking between amino acids, genipin also undergoes a long-range intermolecular crosslinking which involves self-crosslinking between genipin

monomers. By tuning the degree of polymerization of polygenipin, the pore size of gelatin scaffold certainly can be controlled for different purposes39.

Cross section SEM images of freeze-dried delignified wood (a), (b) and freeze-dried delignified wood/gelatin hydrogel crosslinked with different genipin concentrations: (c), (d) 1 mM; (e),

(f) 50 mM; (g), (h) 100 mM.

wood.Full size tableCompressive mechanical properties

The typical compressive stress–strain curves of gelatin, delignified wood, and delignified wood/gelatin hydrogels are shown in Fig. 5 and their mechanical property data are summarized in

Table 3. When neat gelatin was chemically crosslinked with genipin, the enhancement in elastic modulus, fracture stress and fracture strain was achieved owing to higher crosslinking density

with increasing concentration of genipin (Table 3). The elastic modulus of gelatin hydrogel increased from 22.5 ± 2.4 kPa to 135.8 ± 23.0 kPa as the genipin concentration increased from 1 to

100 mM, respectively. The crosslinked gelatin hydrogel showed elastic behaviour and large deformation (compressive strain up to 50%) was induced with low stress load (Fig. 5a). Increasing

crosslinking density resulted in denser polymer network with decreased water content (from 88.2 ± 0.1 to 85.9 ± 0.1 wt%, Table 1), which substantially enhanced the mechanical properties of

neat gelatin hydrogel27. As the genipin concentration increased from 1 to 100 mM, significant increase in fracture strain and fracture stress for neat gelatin hydrogel was observed (Table

3). The impact of crosslinking density on the mechanical properties of gelatin is significant due to its amorphous nature and lack of rigidity27. Relatively high fracture stress (1.01 ± 0.37

 MPa) was achieved at a fracture strain of 75.3 ± 4.9% by using 100 mM genipin.

Compressive stress–strain curves of (a) genipin crosslinked gelatin hydrogels and (b) delignified wood and delignified wood/gelatin hydrogels at genipin concentrations of 1, 50, and 100 

mM.

By contrast, the delignified wood hydrogel showed a completely different compressive stress–strain curve with an initial linear elastic deformation followed by a non-linear plastic yielding

and the highest stress (311.0 ± 21.6 kPa) was reached at a compressive strain of 3.2 ± 0.3% (Fig. 5b). Due to the misalignment of fibres, shear force was generated along with compression,

thus tangential displacement of fibres under stress transitioned into a plateau when the strain was between 5 and 90%. Benefit from the crystalline nature of cellulose and oriented

organization of cellulose microfibrils along axial direction in the secondary cell wall of wood40, high stiffness was achieved with an elastic modulus of 21.89 ± 3.76 MPa for the delignified

wood hydrogel. When gelatin was infiltrated into delignified wood and crosslinked by genipin, the composite hydrogels showed similar compressive stress–strain profile as delignified wood,

and a decrease in elastic modulus with an enhancement in yield stress and an increase in yield strain were observed (Table 3). Although the composite hydrogels had much lower water content

(higher solid density) as compared to delignified wood (Table1), the elastic modulus of the composite hydrogels decreased with the increasing genipin concentration as compared to delignified

wood. This suggests that the volume fraction of infiltrated gelatin inside the wood cell walls and cell wall corners were increased with increasing crosslinking of gelatin. Indeed, the

interaction between gelatin and delignified wood was also enhanced with increasing genipin concentration as confirmed by FTIR analysis. When 1 mM genipin was applied, slight increase in both

yield stress and yield strain was found for composite hydrogel as compared to delignified wood. As the concentrations of genipin were increased to 50 and 100 mM, the yield stress of

delignified wood/gelatin hydrogel increased two-fold compared to delignified wood to 652.6 ± 49.8 kPa and 689.3 ± 34.9 kPa, respectively, owing to the dense crosslinking between amino acid

chains of gelatin and subsequent formation of hydrogel network within the cell lumens of delignified wood as revealed in Fig. 4e–h. The network structure inside wood cell lumens contributed

to energy dissipation during compression, improving the resistance of composite hydrogel to yield, hence the yield strain was increased to 9.7 ± 0.2% and 10.2 ± 0.6%, respectively. The

fracture strains of delignified wood and the composite hydrogels are all higher than 95%. The compressive stress of the composite hydrogels at 95% compressive strain was increased

significantly with increasing genipin concentration as compared to that for delignified wood. With 100 mM genipin, the compressive stress at 95% compressive strain was as high as 14.44 ± 

2.65 MPa, one to two magnitude higher than that for neat delignified wood and the fracture stress for neat gelatin crosslinked with 100 mM genipin (Table 3). The elastic modulus of the

composi

te hydrogel (11.82 ± 1.51 MPa) was also two magnitude higher than that for neat gelatin hydrogel at 100 mM genipin. Such synergistic enhancement in both elastic modulus and compressive

stress indicated the mutual toughening effect owing to the formation of porous structure of gelatin in the lumens of honeycomb like wood cell structure and strong intermolecular hydrogen

bonding between infiltrated gelatin and delignified wood inside the wood cell walls and cell wall corners.

The swelling behaviour is another key factor which is strongly influenced by the structure of composite hydrogel. To study the swelling behaviour of neat gelatin hydrogel, delignified wood

and composite hydrogels, samples were freeze-dried and then rehydrated in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.4) buffer at 37 °C for 48 h to reach an equilibrium state. As shown in Fig. 6, the equilibrium water

uptake of delignified wood was 1747.5 ± 14.1% because of its high porosity and hydrophilicity. Freeze-fried neat gelatin hydrogel also showed high water uptake, around 2120.1 ± 153.9%, when

1 mM genipin was applied. The loosely crosslinked gelatin network enabled accommodating large volume of phosphate buffer. The swelling of neat gelatin hydrogel was restricted when higher

concentration of genipin was applied. A water uptake of 825.1 ± 17.7% was obtained at a genipin concentration of 100 mM. A plausible explanation is the formation of a rigid network through

genipin crosslinking, which reduced the accessible hydrophilic groups as well as the extensibility of gelatin network. Different from neat gelatin, delignified wood/gelatin hydrogels showed

less dependence on the genipin concentration. The water uptake values of the composite hydrogels were 431.1 ± 5.7%, 427.9 ± 4.4%, and 407.5 ± 5.2% at a genipin concentration of 1, 50, and

100 mM, respectively. Such lower water uptake values as compared to delignified wood and neat gelatin were resulted from the infiltration of gelatin into wood cell wall and the formation of

strong intermolecular hydrogen bonding between delignified wood and gelatin after genipin crosslinking. These values also suggested that the corresponding water content of the PBS rehydrated

composite hydrogels were ca. 81.2%, 81.1%, and 80.3%, respectively, same to the original water content in the composite hydrogels (Table 1). This indicates that unlike the neat gelatin

hydrogel, further swelling of the composite hydrogel did not occur. Indeed, the accessibility of delignified wood cell wall and hydrophilicity of both components were significantly

constrained. Particularly, the rigid nature of the cell wall structure in delignified wood restricted the swelling of gelatin.

Effect of genipin concentration on the equilibrium swelling ratio of delignified wood, delignified wood/gelatin hydrogel and gelatin hydrogels in PBS buffer solution.

As a comparison, when 30 wt% gelatin was crosslinked with N-(3-dimethy-laminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) within the bacterial cellulose (BC) scaffold27, the

double-network (DN) composite hydrogel showed a compressive stress of 3.7 MPa, a modulus of 1.7 MPa, and an a degree of swelling of 5.8, which is equal to a water uptake value of 480%.

Another example is TEMPO-oxidized CNF/gelatin (1:10 by weight) composite, in which gelatin was crosslinked initially through physical dehydrothermal treatment and then chemically with 6 wt%

hexamethylenediamine and/or 1 wt% genipin. The resulted composite hydrogel showed a compressive stress of 25.6 kPa, an elastic modulus of 35.2 ± 3.1 kPa and a swelling ratio of 10.8 ± 0.6,

which is equal to a water uptake value of around 1080%8. Photo-crosslinked IPN hydrogel consisting of chitosan and gelatin methacryloyl achieved a compressive modulus of 116.08 ± 9.62 kPa

and an equilibrium water uptake value of around 1000%19. Taking advantage of the native aligned cellulose fibrils in wood cell wall and honeycomb like cellular structure of wood5, the

delignified wood/gelatin hydrogel prepared in this work was proved to be both mechanically tough under compression (Fig. 5) and highly resistant to swelling under physiological condition

(Fig. 6). Besides, the water content of delignified wood/gelatin hydrogel (ca.81%, Table 1) is among the highest which is close to that in natural cartilage21.

A bio-based composite hydrogel composed of gelatin and delignified wood was successfully prepared through infiltration of gelatin into the porous wood template at 50 °C and subsequent

crosslinking with genipin at 4 °C. The composite hydrogels demonstrated tunable porous structure with high mechanical strength and high resistance to swelling during rehydration in phosphate

buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4) at 37 °C. With increasing genipin concentration from 1 to 100 mM, the composite hydrogels showed an increase in compressive yield stress as high as 689.3 ± 34.9 kPa

owing to the infiltration of gelatin into the cell wall and cell wall corner and the formation of gelatin network within lumen of the well-preserved wood cell structure in delignified wood.

The elastic modulus of the composite hydrogel was 11.82 ± 1.51 MPa at a genipin concentration of 100 mM, two magnitude higher than the corresponding neat gelatin hydrogel. The swelling of

gelatin was confined within lumen of the wood cell, resulting in the water uptake at equilibrium state as low as 407.5 ± 5.2%. These unique properties are superior to those for the DN

hydrogel of BC/gelatin and IPN hydrogels of CNF/gelatin and chitosan/gelatin. In addition, both pore size of the infiltrated gelatin and porosity of the freeze-dried composite hydrogels were

tunable by varying the genipin concentration. This work demonstrated wood structure an excellent template in preparation of high-performance composite hydrogels, taking advantages of

inherently aligned CNFs and native porous cell wall structure for mechanical reinforcement and structural confinement.

Gelatin from bovine skin (75 Bloom), sodium chlorite, sodium acetate, acetic acid, glycine, sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate and sodium phosphate dibasic dihydrate were purchased from

Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. Genipin powder (98%, HPLC) was a product of Zhixin Biotechnology, China. Wood blocks (10 × 10 × 10 mm3, Longitudinal × Radial × Tangential) were cut from

air-dried balsa wood (Ochroma pyramidale) sticks with a density of 175 kg/m3 purchased from Wentzel’s Co. Ltd., Sweden.

Balsa wood blocks were immersed in 1 wt% sodium chlorite buffered with acetate solution (PH 4.6) overnight at room temperature prior to heating up. The delignification was then carried out

at 80 °C for 24 h. After washing thoroughly with deionized water, the delignified wood blocks were kept in water until further use.

hydrogels

Gelatin was dissolved in deionized water at concentration of 30 wt% and stored overnight at 50 °C. The delignified wood blocks were then transferred into the gelatin solution and kept for 1

week at 50 °C to ensure a complete infiltration of gelatin into the delignified wood. Gelatin-impregnated wood samples were then taken out and cooled down to 4 °C overnight to allow physical

crosslinking of gelatin. The samples were then crosslinked in a genipin solution with different concentrations: 1, 50, and 100 mM at 4 °C for 48 h. The composite hydrogels were then washed

with 1 wt% glycine solution followed by deionized water to remove the unreacted genipin. Neat gelatin hydrogel was prepared in the same way as the composite hydrogel.

reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR)

ATR-FTIR spectra of original wood, delignified wood, delignified wood/gelatin hydrogel, and neat gelatin without genipin crosslinking were obtained with a FTIR spectrometer (Spectrum 2000,

Perkin-Elmer, USA). The resolution was 4 cm-1 and 32 scans were accumulated over a range of 600–4000 cm-1 for each sample. Prior to FTIR characterisation, thin slices of each samples were

obtained with microtome and freeze-dried.

The morphology of crosslinked gelatin within the delignified wood structure was characterized by using an optical microscope (LSM 510 Pa, Zeiss, Germany) in wet state. The microstructure was

further characterized by using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, S-4800, Hitachi, Japan) working at low acceleration voltage (3 kV) and short working distance (8 mm).

Thin Sections (200 μm in thickness) were obtained from the cross section of the delignified wood/gelatin hydrogel and delignified wood with a sliding microtome (SM 2010R, Leica, Germany).

The hydrogel sections were then frozen at − 20 °C for 24 h and lyophilized with a freeze-dryer for 48 h. Freeze-dried sections were fixed onto metal stubs with carbon tape and then sputtered

with platinum-palladium with a thickness of 3 nm. Pore size of the infiltrated gelatin in the freeze-dried composite hydrogel was measured from the FE-SEM images using Image-J software and

100 pores were measured for each sample41,42.

Compression test was carried out on a universal mechanical tester (Instron-5566, Instron, USA) equipped with a 10 kN loading cell. The strain rate was 1 mm/min. Both gelatin hydrogel and

delignified wood/gelatin hydrogels were taken out from water and tested immediately after wiping off the excessive water on the surface. Load was applied to the composite hydrogel samples

along the longitudinal direction of the wood. At least five specimens were tested for each sample.

Delignified wood, delignified wood/gelatin hydrogels and neat gelatin hydrogels were freeze-dried and then rehydrated in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4) at 37 °C for 48 h. The equilibrium

water uptake (Q) was calculated using the following equation:

where We is the weight of the sample at equilibrium condition and Wd is the weight of the dry sample.

The porosity of freeze-dried composite hydrogels was estimated based on their bulk density (ρb) calculated from dry weight and apparent volume (geometry), and true density (ρt) measured with

a helium pycnometer (AccuPyc 1330, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA), using the following equation:

$${\text{porosity}} = \left( {1 - \frac{{\rho _{b} }}{{\rho _{t} }}} \right) \times 100\%$$ (2) References Cabane, E., Keplinger, T., Kunniger, T., Merk, V. & Burgert, I. Functional

lignocellulosic materials prepared by ATRP from a wood scaffold. Sci. Rep. 6, 31287. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31287 (2016).

Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Berglund, L. A. & Burgert, I. Bioinspired wood nanotechnology for functional materials. Adv. Mater. 30, 1704285. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201704285 (2018).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fu, Q., Ansari, F., Zhou, Q. & Berglund, L. A. Wood nanotechnology for strong, mesoporous, and hydrophobic biocomposites for selective separation of oil/water mixtures. ACS Nano 12,

2222–2230. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b00005 (2018).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jiang, F. et al. Wood-based nanotechnologies toward sustainability. Adv. Mater. 30, 1703453. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703453 (2018).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Kong, W. et al. Muscle-inspired highly anisotropic, strong ion-conductive hydrogels. Adv. Mater. 30, 1801934. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201801934 (2018).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Loth, T. et al. Gelatin-based biomaterial engineering with anhydride-containing oligomeric cross-linkers. Biomacromolecules 15, 2104–2118. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm500241y (2014).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Gattazzo, F. et al. Gelatin-genipin-based biomaterials for skeletal muscle tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 106, 2763–2777. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34057

(2018).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Campodoni, E. et al. Polymeric 3D scaffolds for tissue regeneration: Evaluation of biopolymer nanocomposite reinforced with cellulose nanofibrils. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 94,

867–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.10.026 (2019).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gilsenan, P. M. & Ross-Murphy, S. B. Viscoelasticity of thermoreversible gelatin gels from mammalian and piscine collagens. J. Rheol. 44, 871–883. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.551118 (2000).

Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Karim, A. A. & Bhat, R. Fish gelatin: Properties, challenges, and prospects as an alternative to mammalian gelatins. Food Hydrocolloid 23, 563–576.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.07.002 (2009).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Bigi, A., Cojazzi, G., Panzavolta, S., Roveri, N. & Rubini, K. Stabilization of gelatin films by crosslinking with genipin. Biomaterials 23, 4827–4832.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00235-1 (2002).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bode, F., da Silva, M. A., Drake, A. F., Ross-Murphy, S. B. & Dreiss, C. A. Enzymatically cross-linked tilapia gelatin hydrogels: Physical, chemical, and hybrid networks. Biomacromolecules

12, 3741–3752. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm2009894 (2011).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Yang, G. et al. Assessment of the characteristics and biocompatibility of gelatin sponge scaffolds prepared by various crosslinking methods. Sci. Rep. 8, 1616.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20006-y (2018).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Zhang, Y. S. & Khademhosseini, A. Advances in engineering hydrogels. Science 356, eaaf3627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf3627 (2017).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Landi, E., Valentini, F. & Tampieri, A. Porous hydroxyapatite/gelatine scaffolds with ice-designed channel-like porosity for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 4, 1620–1626.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.023 (2008).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu, X., Smith, L. A., Hu, J. & Ma, P. X. Biomimetic nanofibrous gelatin/apatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 30, 2252–2258.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.068 (2009).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nadeem, D., Kiamehr, M., Yang, X. & Su, B. Fabrication and in vitro evaluation of a sponge-like bioactive-glass/gelatin composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 33,

2669–2678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.02.021 (2013).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Sharifi, E. et al. Preparation of a biomimetic composite scaffold from gelatin/collagen and bioactive glass fibers for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 59, 533–541.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.09.037 (2016).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Suo, H. et al. Interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels composed of chitosan and photocrosslinkable gelatin with enhanced mechanical properties for tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C

92, 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.07.016 (2018).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Sarem, M., Moztarzadeh, F. & Mozafari, M. How can genipin assist gelatin/carbohydrate chitosan scaffolds to act as replacements of load-bearing soft tissues?. Carbohydr. Polym. 93, 635–643.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.099 (2013).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Naseri, N., Deepa, B., Mathew, A. P., Oksman, K. & Girandon, L. Nanocellulose-based interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) hydrogels for cartilage applications. Biomacromolecules 17,

3714–3723. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01243 (2016).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Wang, K., Nune, K. C. & Misra, R. D. The functional response of alginate-gelatin-nanocrystalline cellulose injectable hydrogels toward delivery of cells and bioactive molecules. Acta

Biomater. 36, 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.016 (2016).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Dash, R., Foston, M. & Ragauskas, A. J. Improving the mechanical and thermal properties of gelatin hydrogels cross-linked by cellulose nanowhiskers. Carbohydr. Polym. 91, 638–645.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.080 (2013).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Naseri, N. et al. 3-Dimensional porous nanocomposite scaffolds based on cellulose nanofibers for cartilage tissue engineering: Tailoring of porosity and mechanical performance. RSC Adv. 6,

5999–6007. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA27246G (2016).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Chen, Y., Zhou, X., Lin, Q. & Jiang, D. Bacterial cellulose/gelatin composites: In situ preparation and glutaraldehyde treatment. Cellulose 21, 2679–2693.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0272-9 (2014).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Kirdponpattara, S., Phisalaphong, M. & Kongruang, S. Gelatin-bacterial cellulose composite sponges thermally cross-linked with glucose for tissue engineering applications. Carbohydr. Polym.

177, 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.094 (2017).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nakayama, A. et al. High mechanical strength double-network hydrogel with bacterial cellulose. Adv. Func. Mater. 14, 1124–1128. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200305197 (2004).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Gladman, A. S., Matsumoto, E. A., Nuzzo, R. G., Mahadevan, L. & Lewis, J. A. Biomimetic 4D printing. Nat. Mater. 15, 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1038/Nmat4544 (2016).

Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hakansson, K. M. et al. Hydrodynamic alignment and assembly of nanofibrils resulting in strong cellulose filaments. Nat. Commun. 5, 4018. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5018 (2014).

Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Stark, N. M., Yelle, D. J. & Agarwal, U. P. Techniques for Characterizing Lignin in Lignin in Polymer Composites (eds. Faruk, O. & Sain, M.) 49–66 (William Andrew, 2016).

Lien, S.-M., Ko, L.-Y. & Huang, T.-J. Effect of crosslinking temperature on compression strength of gelatin scaffold for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 30,

631–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2010.02.019 (2010).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Lien, S.-M., Li, W.-T. & Huang, T.-J. Genipin-crosslinked gelatin scaffolds for articular cartilage tissue engineering with a novel crosslinking method. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 28, 36–43.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2006.12.015 (2008).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Sung, H. W., Huang, D. M., Chang, W. H., Huang, R. N. & Hsu, J. C. Evaluation of gelatin hydrogel crosslinked with various crosslinking agents as bioadhesives: In vitro study. J. Biomed.

Mater. Res. 46, 520–530. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19990915)46:4%3c520::AID-JBM10%3e3.0.CO;2-9 (1999).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Means, A. K. & Grunlan, M. A. Modern strategies to achieve tissue-mimetic, mechanically robust hydrogels. ACS Macro Lett. 8, 705–713. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.9b00276 (2019).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Lin, S. Y., Chu, H. L. & Wei, Y. S. Pressure-induced transformation of alpha-helix to beta-sheet in the secondary structures of amyloid beta (1–40) peptide exacerbated by temperature. J.

Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 19, 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2002.10506768 (2002).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guo, H. et al. Changes in the supramolecular structures of cellulose after hydrolysis studied by terahertz spectroscopy and other methods. RSC Adv. 4, 57945–57952.

https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra08314h (2014).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Hashim, D. M. et al. Potential use of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for differentiation of bovine and porcine gelatins. Food Chem. 118, 856–860.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.05.049 (2010).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Barros, A. A. et al. Water and carbon dioxide: Green solvents for the extraction of collagen/gelatin from marine sponges. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 3, 254–260.

https://doi.org/10.1021/sc500621z (2015).

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ge, L. et al. Short-range and long-range cross-linking effects of polygenipin on gelatin-based composite materials. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 104, 2712–2722.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35814 (2016).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Borrega, M. & Gibson, L. J. Mechanics of balsa (Ochroma pyramidale) wood. Mech. Mater. 84, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.01.014 (2015).

Article  Google Scholar 

Thangprasert, A., Tansakul, C., Thuaksubun, N. & Meesane, J. Mimicked hybrid hydrogel based on gelatin/PVA for tissue engineering in subchondral bone interface for osteoarthritis surgery.

Mater. Des. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108113 (2019).

Article  Google Scholar 

Rueden, C. T. et al. Image J2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinform. 18, 529. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z (2017).

Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

The authors thank Wallenberg Wood Science Center (WWSC) and the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education STINT (CH2017-7275) for supporting this

work. S. Wang thanks the China Scholarship Council (CSC) for supporting his PhD study.

Open Access funding provided by Kungliga Tekniska Hogskolan.

Author informationAuthors and Affiliations Division of Glycoscience, Department of Chemistry, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of

Technology, AlbaNova University Centre, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden

Shennan Wang, Kai Li & Qi Zhou

Wallenberg Wood Science Center, Department of Fibre and Polymer Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44, Stockholm, Sweden

Shennan Wang, Kai Li & Qi Zhou

AuthorsShennan WangView author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Kai LiView author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Qi ZhouView author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

S.W., K.L. and Q.Z. developed the concepts. S.W. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. S.W. and Q.Z. wrote the main manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author Correspondence to Qi Zhou.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or

format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or

other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in

the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the

copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this articleCite this article Wang, S., Li, K. & Zhou, Q. High strength and low swelling composite hydrogels from gelatin and delignified wood. Sci Rep 10, 17842 (2020).

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74860-w

Download citation

Received: 02 March 2020

Accepted: 07 October 2020

Published: 20 October 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74860-w

Share this article Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative