Benthic biota of chilean fjords and channels in 25 years of cruises of the national oceanographic committee

Nature

Benthic biota of chilean fjords and channels in 25 years of cruises of the national oceanographic committee"


Play all audios:

Loading...

ABSTRACT The CIMAR program (Marine Research Cruises to Remote Areas) run by the Chilean Navy through the National Oceanographic Committee has been developed since 1995, focused on Chilean


fjord and channel zones (~41–56°S; “CIMAR-Fjords”) and Chilean remote islands (“CIMAR-Islands”). Samples and data was collected on biotic and abiotic variables on all these cruises, both


from the water column and benthos. Our work standardizes, compiles, and summarizes the published information on benthic organisms for twenty-one CIMAR-Fjords cruises developed in the first


25 years of the program, plus the Southern Ice Fields Cruise 1995 (precursor of the CIMAR program), which includes the distribution, abundance and geographic location of cruises sampling


stations. The data set includes 8,854 records from 880 different localities, corresponding to 1,225 species from 24 different phyla (four kingdoms) and more than 150,000 individuals. Only


two cruises did not record any benthic sampling. The fjords and channels of Chilean Patagonia have high biodiversity, so we hope that our data set will serve as a baseline for ecological


studies and ecosystem conservation. SIMILAR CONTENT BEING VIEWED BY OTHERS SIBES: LONG-TERM AND LARGE-SCALE MONITORING OF INTERTIDAL MACROZOOBENTHOS AND SEDIMENT IN THE DUTCH WADDEN SEA


Article Open access 11 February 2025 A GLOBAL, HISTORICAL DATABASE OF TUNA, BILLFISH, AND SAURY LARVAL DISTRIBUTIONS Article Open access 19 July 2022 THIRTY YEARS OF NUTRIENTS AND


BIOGEOCHEMISTRY IN THE NORWEGIAN, GREENLAND AND ICELAND SEAS, 1990–2019 Article Open access 06 May 2023 BACKGROUND & SUMMARY The Marine Research Cruises in Remote Areas (CIMAR, acronym


in Spanish) have been carried out continuously since 1995, covering Chilean coastal and oceanic areas that are difficult to access and far away from the main ports of the country1. This is a


research initiative by the Chilean Navy, developed through its National Oceanographic Committee (CONA, by its acronym in Spanish). CONA is an organization whose main function is to


coordinate the institutions that carry out research and activities related to marine sciences in Chile. It currently has 31 member institutions—universities and various public and private


organizations that develop marine sciences in Chile. This program has a specific research component in the Channels and Fjords of Patagonia in southern Chile (~41°S to ~56°S), called


“CIMAR-Fjords Cruises”. These places require complex logistics to carry out research and are of great socioeconomic importance; until the mid-1990s there was little scientific information


about them, except for some foreign explorations with little or no national participation2,3,4,5,6,7. An exploratory marine scientific research cruise was carried out in 1995 in marine


waters adjacent to the Ice Fields8 coordinated by the National Oceanographic Committee, to promote basic oceanographic studies. Numerous expeditions, the majority led by foreigners, have


documented benthic species in the Patagonian zone of the fjords and channels in southern Chile, including Mollusca9,10,11,12,13,14,15, Crustacea16,17,18, Polychaeta19,20, and


Foraminifera21,22,23 among others. Some studies have sought to advance our understanding of specific groups by offering reviews of specific taxa, biogeographical studies, catalogues, or


lists of species24,25,26,27. Over the course of the CIMAR program’s first 25 years, 362 research projects have been completed on its cruises, resulting in more than 400 publications in


scholarly journals1, plus the publication of their data in annual cruise reports. The majority of this data was gathered during the so-called CIMAR-Fjords Voyages, which made up 21 of the 25


cruises of the CIMAR program, that focus in the fjords and channels of southern Chile (between 41°S and 56°S).Each research cruise included a significant amount of work on the benthic


compartment, where a wide variety of benthic organisms were collected and described in both the cruise reports8,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46 and several


peer-review publications (e.g.25,47,48,49,50,51,52). The objective of this study was to compile all the benthic records of the CIMAR-Fjords cruises, as well as the 1996 exploratory cruise to


the Southern Patagonian Ice Fields. The assembled database is anticipated to serve as a baseline for new research projects and initiatives in the area. This data descriptor presents a


database with 8,854 records from 880 different localities, corresponding to 1,225 species from 24 different phyla (four kingdoms) and over 150,000 individuals. METHODS STUDY AREA With a long


coastline and a variety of intertidal and subtidal environments, the fjords and channels of southern Chile exhibit distinctive oceanographic conditions that are mostly explained by the


fluctuating influence of oceanic, glacial, and pluvial waters. These features makes these environments highly sensitive to environmental pressures (climate change, marine pollution and


fishing extraction, among other stressors)53. This area encompasses the Chiloense Marine and Channels and Fjords Southern Chile Ecoregions in the Magellanic Biogeographic Province54. A


significant portion of the various environments seen in the fjords and channels of southern Chile have been described in reports and publications related to the CIMAR-Fjords Cruises (Fig. 


1), including biotic and abiotic aspects, demonstrating differences in diversity and abundance of various taxa. This work covers a total of 880 locations with benthic information of biota


recorded in the CIMAR-Fjords Cruises, plus the Southern Ice Fields Cruise 1995 (Fig. 1). The samples cover 25-years, from August, 1995 to October, 2019 (Table 1). Five cruises covered more


than half of the total sampled sites: CIMAR-2 (114 sites), CIMAR-11 (96), CIMAR-16 (91), CIMAR-3 (82) and CIMAR-7 (77). The sites cover the three southernmost administrative regions of Chile


(Los Lagos, Aysén and Magallanes), and their nine provinces. The provinces with the largest number of sites were Aysén (in Aysén Region, 221 sites), Última Esperanza Province (in Magallanes


Region, 178 sites) and Chiloé (in Los Lagos Region, 101 sites), accumulating 500 sites among the three provinces. TYPES OF SAMPLING AND PRESERVATION The database contains records of 8854


occurrences of benthic species. Samples were collected using the following methods and sampling gears: Agassiz or modified Agassiz trawl (3625 occurrences), Box corer (3010), Scuba and


intertidal sampling (1097), Van Veen and other combined sampling devices (874) and undetermined sampling gears (248). The record book of the first 25 years of the CIMAR cruises1 was used to


identify the many studies that reported benthic biota observations, from the intertidal to the deep sea (Fig. 2a). The reports of the 1995 Southern Ice Fields Cruise8 were also investigated


to identify benthic dataset. The data were selected from official information sources (Hydrographic and Oceanographic Data Centre of the Chilean Navy and National Oceanographic Committee of


Chile) by searching for articles on the World Wide Web; all information sources were downloaded, organized and systematized (Fig. 2b). In the case of the World Wide Web, the Google Scholar


and Web of Science portals were used and the search strategy consisted of systematically using keyword combinations (e.g. “CIMAR-Fjords”, “CIMAR-Fiordos”, benthic, benthos, [main taxa] and


any other derivations and combinations of terms that may be necessary). For each corresponding paper or report, all the records of the declared benthic biota were extracted, comparing and/or


complementing the records present in both reports and papers (Fig. 2c). All occurrence records were tabulated and arranged in spreadsheets according to the DarwinCore standard55,56. Then,


the entire data set was analysed, and the taxonomy updated as required in accordance with the World Register of Marine Species57. Finally, the dataset was published in GBIF through the


Integrated Publishing Toolkit (Fig. 2d). DATA RECORDS The data were recorded under the DarwinCore standard55,56 in a matrix named “Benthic biota of CIMAR-Fiordos and Southern Ice Field


Cruises”58. The occurrence dataset contains direct basic information (description, scope [temporal, geographic and taxonomic], methodology, bibliography, contacts, data description, GBIF


registration and citation), project details, metrics (taxonomy and occurrences classification), activity (citations and download events) and download options. The following data fields were


occupied: Column 1: “occurrenceID” (single indicator of the biological record indicating the cruise and correlative record). Column 2: “basisOfRecord” (“PreservedSpecimen” for occurrence


records with catalogue number of scientific collection, “MaterialCitation” for any literature record). Column 3: “institutionCode” (The acronym in use by the institution having custody of


the sample or information referred to in the record). Column 4: “collectionCode” (The name of the cruise). Column 5: “catalogNumber” (The repository number in museums or correlative number).


Column 6: “type” (All records entered as “text”). Column 7: “language” (Spanish, English or both). Column 8: “institutionID” (The identifier for the institution having custody of the sample


or information referred to in the record). Column 9: “collectionID” (The identifier for the collection or dataset from which the record was derived). Column 10: “datasetID” (The code


“CONA-benthic-biota-database” for entire database). Column 11: “recordedBy” (Author/s who recorded the original occurrence [publication source]). Column 12: “individualCount” (Number of


individuals recorded). Column 13: “associatedReferences” (Publication source [report and/or paper/s] for each record). Column 14: “samplingProtocol” (The sampling gear for each record).


Column 15: “eventDate” (The date-time or interval during which the record occurred). Column 16: “eventRemarks” (Comments or notes about the event). Column 17: “continent” (Location). Column


18: “country” (Location). Column 19: “countryCode” (The standard code for the country in which the location occurs). Column 20: “stateProvince” (Location, refers to the Administrative Region


of Chile). Column 21: “county” (Location, refers to the Administrative Province of Chile). Column 22: “municipality” (Location, refers to the Administrative Commune of Chile). Column 23:


“locality” (The specific name of the place). Column 24: “verbatimLocality” (The original textual description of the place). Column 25: “verbatimDepth” (The original description of the


depth). Column 26: “minimumDepthInMeters” (The shallowest depth of a range of depths). Column 27: “maximumDepthInMeters” (The deepest depth of a range of depths). Column 28:


“locationRemarks” (The name of the sample station of the cruise). Column 29: “verbatimLatitude” (The verbatim original latitude of the location). Column 30: “verbatimLongitude” (The verbatim


original longitude of the location). Column 31: “verbatimCoordinateSystem” (The coordinate format for the “verbatimLatitude” and “verbatimLongitude” or the “verbatimCoordinates” of the


location). Column 32: “verbatimSRS” (The spatial reference system [SRS] upon which coordinates given in “verbatimLatitude” and “verbatimLongitude” are based) Column 33: “decimalLatitude”


(The geographic latitude in decimal degrees). Column 34: “decimalLongitude” (The geographic longitude in decimal degrees). Column 35: “geodeticDatum” (The spatial reference system [SRS] upon


which the geographic coordinates given in “decimalLatitude” and “decimalLongitude” was based). Column 36: “coordinateUncertaintyInMeters” (The horizontal distance from the given


“decimalLatitude” and “decimalLongitude” describing the smallest circle containing the whole of the location). Column 37: “georeferenceRemarks” (Notes about the spatial description


determination). Column 38: “identifiedBy” (Responsible for recording the original occurrence [publication source]). Column 39: “dateIdentified” (The date-time or interval during which the


identification occurred.) Column 40: “identificationQualifier” (A taxonomic determination [e.g., “sp.”, “cf.”]). Column 41: “scientificNameID” (An identifier for the nomenclatural details of


a scientific name). Column 42: “scientificName” (The name of species or taxon of the occurrence record). Column 43: “kingdom” (The scientific name of the kingdom in which the taxon is


classified). Column 44: “phylum” (The scientific name of the phylum or division in which the taxon is classified). Column 45: “class” (The scientific name of the class in which the taxon is


classified). Column 46: “order” (The scientific name of the order in which the taxon is classified). Column 47: “family” (The scientific name of the family in which the taxon is classified).


Column 48: “genus” (The scientific name of the genus in which the taxon is classified). Column 49: “subgenus” (The scientific name of the subgenus in which the taxon is classified). Column


50: “specificEpithet” (The name of the first or species epithet of the “scientificName”). Column 51: “infraspecificEpithet” (The name of the lowest or terminal infraspecific epithet of the


“scientificName”). Column 52: “taxonRank” (The taxonomic rank of the most specific name in the “scientificName”). Column 53: “scientificNameAuthorship” (The authorship information for the


“scientificName” formatted according to the conventions of the applicable nomenclatural Code). Column 54: “verbatimIdentification” (A string representing the taxonomic identification as it


appeared in the original record). The information sources (see Fig. 2b) provided a total of 107 publications (22 cruise reports and 85 scientific papers; see Fig. 2c). Nineteen of the 22


cruise reports reviewed provided species occurrence records8,28,29,30,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46, one provided qualitative or descriptive data, with no recorded


occurrences31, and two did not provide information on benthic biota (CIMAR-9 and −23 cruises). Of all the scientific papers reviewed, 74 provided records of species occurrences (Table 2),


while 11 did not provide any record, as they were data without occurrences of geographically referenced species or with descriptive or qualitative information: Foraminifera59,60,61,62,


Annelida63,64,65,66, Fishes67, Mollusca68 and Echinodermata69. The phyla with the highest number of publications were the following: Annelida (present in 18 reports and 21 papers), Mollusca


(in 14 and 20), Arthropoda (in 10 and 18), Echinodermata (in 10 and 9), Chordata (in 10 and 9) and Foraminifera (in 4 and 10). The information registry includes data on occurrences and


number of individuals for 8,854 records (files in the database), representing 1,225 species (Fig. 3). The main taxa in terms of occurrence and number of species were Annelida (mainly


Polychaeta), Foraminifera, Mollusca and Arthopoda (mainly Crustacea), together accumulating ~70% of total occurrences and ~73% of the total species (Fig. 3). The large number of recorded


occurrences of Myzozoa (10%) should be highlighted, which, however, only represent about 32 species. Echinodermata represented ~8% of occurrences and 7% of species. The cruises with the


highest number of occurrences were CIMAR-2 (with 1,424), followed by CIMAR-8 (1,040) and CIMAR-16 (813) (Fig. 4). Three dominant taxonomic groups were recorded in most cruises, except for


cruises CIMAR-1, CIMAR-4, CIMAR-17, CIMAR-18 and CIMAR-24 (Fig. 4). The cruises with the highest number of species recorded were CIMAR-2 (with 335), CIMAR-3 (328) and CIMAR-8 (323) (Fig. 5).


Three or fewer dominant taxonomic groups were recorded only in the CIMAR-1, CIMAR-4, CIMAR-17, CIMAR-18 and CIMAR-24 cruises (Fig. 5). The latitudinal bands 42°S and 45°S are those with the


highest number of occurrences (Fig. 6), while the 56°S and 46°S bands had the fewest. The highest number of species was recorded in the 52°S and 50°S latitudinal bands, while, as with the


occurrences, the lowest values corresponded to the 56°S and 46°S latitudinal bands (Fig. 6). TECHNICAL VALIDATION The biodiversity data was formatted according to the Darwin Core


standard55,56 of the GBIF platform. Each occurrence was entered according to its record in all the sources of information present: cruise reports and/or publications. Then each occurrence


checked against the original coordinates published in the cruise reports. The depth data, sampling gear, individual count and –when applicable– the biological collection repository number


were also compared between the primary information sources (cruise reports) and publications. A considerable number of occurrences were corrected after this comparison (total: 302


occurrences), mainly by adjusting their coordinates or other location data; these modifications were noted in the database in the “georeferenceRemarks” or “eventRemarks” column, depending on


the nature of the modification. A total of 77 occurrences did not record geographic location (latitude and longitude) and could not be inferred from any source. Finally, all the


nomenclature was verified by using World Register of Marine Species57, “WoRMS Taxon match” tool. CODE AVAILABILITY No custom code was used. REFERENCES * Comité Oceanográfico Nacional. _CIMAR


25 años. Cruceros de Investigación Marina en Áreas Remotas_. (Servicio Hidrográfico y Oceanográfico de la Armada de Chile, 2021). * Fitzroy, R., King, P. P. & Darwin, C. _Narrative of


the surveying voyages of His Majesty’s ships Adventure and Beagle, between the years 1826 and 1836, describing their examination of the southern shores of South America, and the Beagle’s


circumnavigation of the globe_. (H. Colburn, 1839). * Martial, L. F. _Histoire du voyage. Mission Scientifique du Cap Horn, 1882–1883_. VOL. 1 (Ministère de la Marine and Ministère de


l’Instruction Publique, 1888). * Murray, J. _A summary of the scientific results obtained at the sounding, dredging and trawling stations of HMS Challenger_. VOL. 1 (HM Stationery Office,


1885). * Holdgate, M. W. The Royal Society Expedition to southern Chile. _Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B._ 152, 434–441 (1960). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Brattström, H. & Johanssen, A.


Ecological and regional zoogeography of the marine benthic fauna of Chile. _Sarsia_ 68, 289–339 (1983). Article  Google Scholar  * Arntz, W. E. & Gorny, M. Cruise Report of the Joint


Chilean-German-Italian Magellan ‘Victor Hensen’ Campaign in 1994. _Ber Polar- Meeresforsch_ 190, 1–113 (1996). Google Scholar  * Comité Oceanográfico Nacional. _Crucero de Investigación


Científica Marina a los Fiordos y Canales adyacentes a Campos de Hielo Sur (18 de agosto - 4 de septiembre de 1995)_. 1–122 (Secretaría Ejecutiva del Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 1995). *


King, P. P. & Broderip, W. J. Description of the Cirrhipeda, Conchifera and Mollusca, in a collection formed by the officies of HMS Adventure and Beagle employed between the years 1826


and 1830 in surveying the southern coast of South America including the Straits of Magalhaens and the coast of Tierra del Fuego. _Zoological Journal_ 5, 332–349 (1832). Google Scholar  *


Rochebrune, A. T. & Mabille, J. Mollusques. in _Mission Scientifique du Cap Horn, 1882–1883_. VOL. 6 1–129 (Ministère de la Marine and Ministère de l’Instruction Publique, 1889). *


Strebel, H. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Molluskenfauna der Magalhaen-Provinz. _Zool. Jahrb., Abt. Syst. Geogr. Biol. Tiere_ 21, 171–248 (1904). Google Scholar  * Soot-Ryen, T. _Reports of the


Lund University Chile Expedition, 1948–49, 35. Pelecypoda_. Avd. 2. Bd 55. Nr 6. (Lunds Universitets Arsskrift. N.F., 1959). * Leloup, E. _Reports of the Lund University Chile Expedition,


1948–49, 27. Polyplacophora_. Avd. 2. Bd 52. Nr 15. (Lunds Universitets Arsskrift. N.F., 1956). * Dell, R. K. The marine Mollusca of the Royal Society Expedition to Southern Chile, 1958–59.


_Rec. Dom. Mus._ 7, 155–233 (1971). Google Scholar  * Linse, K. _The shelled Magellanic Mollusca: with special reference to biogeography relations in the Southern Ocean_. (A.R.G. Gantner


Verlag KG, 2002). * Milne-Edward, A. Crustacés. In _Mission Scientifique du Cap Horn, 1882–1883_. vol. 6 1-76. pl. 1–8 (Ministère de la Marine and Ministère de l’Instruction Publique, 1891).


* Haig, J. _Reports of the Lund University Chile Expedition, 1948–49, 20. The Crustacea Anomura of Chile_. Avd. 2. Bd 51. Nr 12. (Lunds Universitets Arsskrift. N.F., 1955). * Garth, J. S.,


Haig, J. & Yaldwyn, J. C. The Decapod Crustacea of the Royal Society Expedition to Southern Chile, 1958–59. _Trans. Roy. Soc. New Zealand_ 8, 169–186 (1967). Google Scholar  * Fauvel, P.


Annélides Polychètes de la Mission du Cap Horn (1882–1883). _Bull. Mus. natl. hist. nat._ 2, 272–298 (1941). Google Scholar  * Wesenberg-Lund, E. _Reports of the Lund University Chile


Expedition 1948–49, 43. Polychaeta Errantia_. Avd. 2. Bd 57. Nr 12. (Lunds Universitets Arsskrift. N.F., 1962). * Brady, H. B. _Report on the foraminifera dredged by HMS Challenger during


the years 1873–1876_. VOL. 9 (Ehrenmitglied des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins, Liineburg; Minister of the Free church of Scotland, 1884). * Ishman, S. E. & Martinez, R. Distribution of


modern benthic foraminifers from the fjord region of southern Chile (42 S to 55 S). _Antarctic Journal of the United States_ 30, 6–7 (1995). Google Scholar  * Violanti, D., Loi, B. &


Melis, R. & others. Distribution of Recent Foraminifera from the Strait of Magellan. First quantitative data. _Boll. Mus. Regionale. Sci. Nat. Torino_ 17, 511–539 (2000). Google Scholar


  * Montiel San Martín, A. Biodiversity, zoogeography and ecology of polychaetes from the Magellan region and adjacent areas = Diversität, Zoogeographie und Ökologie von Polychaeten der


Magellanregion und angrenzender Gebiete. _Ber Polar- Meeresforsch_ 505, 1–112 (2005). Google Scholar  * Hromic, T., Ishman, S. & Silva, N. Benthic foraminiferal distributions in Chilean


fjords: 47°S to 54°S. _Mar. Micropaleontol._ 59, 115–134 (2006). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Esquete, P. & Aldea, C. Benthic Peracarids (Crustacea) from an unexplored area of


Patagonian channels and Fjords. _Biodivers. Data J_. 8 (2020). * Häussermann, V. & Försterra, G. _Marine benthic fauna of Chilean Patagonia: illustrated identification guide_. (Nature in


Focus, 2009). * CONA. _Taller sobre los resultados del Crucero Cimar-Fiordo 1. Libro de Resúmenes_. (Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 1996). * CONA. _Taller sobre los resultados del Crucero


Cimar-Fiordo 2. Libro de Resúmenes_. (Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 1997). * CONA. _Taller sobre los resultados del Crucero Cimar-Fiordo 3. Libro de Resúmenes_. (Comité Oceanográfico


Nacional, 1999). * CONA. _Taller sobre los resultados del Crucero Cimar-Fiordo 4. Libro de Resúmenes_. (Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 1999). * CONA. _Taller sobre los resultados del Crucero


Cimar 7 - Fiordos. Libro de Resúmenes_. (Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 2002). * CONA. _Taller sobre los resultados del Crucero Cimar 8 - Fiordos. Libro de Resúmenes_. (Comité Oceanográfico


Nacional, 2003). * CONA. _Taller sobre los resultados del Crucero Cimar 10 - Fiordos. Libro de Informes Preliminares_. (Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 2005). * CONA. _Resultados Crucero


Cimar 11 - Fiordos. Libro de Informes Preliminares_. (Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 2006). * CONA. _Resultados Crucero Cimar 12 - Fiordos. Libro de Informes Preliminares_. (Comité


Oceanográfico Nacional, 2007). * CONA. _Resultados Crucero Cimar 13 - Fiordos. Libro de Informes Preliminares_. (Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 2008). * CONA. _Resultados Crucero Cimar 14 -


Fiordos. Libro de Informes Preliminares_. (Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 2009). * CONA. _Resultados Crucero Cimar 15 - Fiordos. Libro de Informes Preliminares_. (Comité Oceanográfico


Nacional, 2010). * CONA. _Resultados Crucero Cimar 16 - Fiordos. Libro de Informes Preliminares_. (Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 2011). * CONA. _Resultados Crucero Cimar 17 - Fiordos. Libro


de Informes Preliminares_. (Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 2012). * CONA. _Resultados Crucero Cimar 18 - Fiordos. Libro de Informes Preliminares_. (Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 2013). *


CONA. _Resultados Crucero Cimar 19 - Fiordos. Libro de Informes Preliminares_. (Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 2014). * CONA. _Resultados Crucero Cimar 20 - Fiordos. Libro de Informes


Preliminares_. (Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 2015). * CONA. _Resultados Crucero Cimar 24 - Fiordos. Libro de Informes Preliminares_. (Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 2019). * CONA.


_Resultados Crucero Cimar 25 - Fiordos. Libro de Informes Preliminares_. (Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 2021). * Cárdenas, J., Aldea, C. & Valdovinos, C. Chilean marine mollusca of


Northern Patagonia collected during the CIMAR-10 Fjords Cruise. _Gayana_ 72, 202–240 (2008). Google Scholar  * Thatje, S. & Brown, A. The macrobenthic ecology of the Straits of Magellan


and the Beagle Channel. _An. Inst. Patagon._ 37, 17–27 (2009). Google Scholar  * Arellano, F., Quezada, L. & Olave, C. Familia Cassidulinidae (Protozoa: Foraminiferida) en canales y


fiordos patagónicos chilenos. _An. Inst. Patagon._ 39, 47–65 (2011). Google Scholar  * Seguel, M., Díaz, P. A. & Labra, G. Patrones de distribución y abundancia de quistes de


dinoflagelados en sedimentos recientes de la Patagonia chilena. _Cienc. Tecnol. Mar_ 36, 129–155 (2015). Google Scholar  * Rozbaczylo, N., Vásquez-Yáñez, P., Moreno, R. A. & Díaz-Díaz,


O. Poliquetos bentónicos Amphinomida, Phyllodocida y Eunicida (Annelida: Polychaeta) de la región de fiordos y canales australes de Chile recolectados durante los cruceros CIMAR 13 al 20


fiordos. _An. Inst. Patagon._ 45, 51–91 (2017). Google Scholar  * Rodríguez-Villegas, C. _et al_. Drivers of dinoflagellate benthic cyst assemblages in the NW Patagonian Fjords System and


its adjacent oceanic shelf, with a focus on harmful species. _Sci. Total Environ._ 785, 147378 (2021). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Fernández, M. _et al_. Diversity, dynamics and


biogeography of Chilean benthic nearshore ecosystems: an overview and guidelines for conservation. _Rev. Chil. de Hist. Nat._ 73, 797–830 (2000). Article  Google Scholar  * Spalding, M. D.


_et al_. Marine ecoregions of the world: a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. _BioScience_ 57, 573–583 (2007). Article  Google Scholar  * Wieczorek, J. _et al_. Darwin Core: An


Evolving Community-Developed Biodiversity Data Standard. _PLoS ONE_ 7, e29715 (2012). Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  * Plata, C., Buitrago, L., Ortiz, R., Díaz,


J. & Escobar, D. Plantilla para la publicación de registros biológicos. V. 3.5. (2020). * WoRMS Editorial Board. World Register of Marine Species. Available from


https://www.marinespecies.org at VLIZ. Accessed 2022-06-14. https://doi.org/10.14284/170 (2022). * Aldea, C., Novoa, L., Acuña, M. P. & Bravo, F. Benthic biota of CIMAR-Fiordos and


Southern Ice Field Cruises. _GBIF._ https://doi.org/10.15468/kq5rjm (2022). * Hromic, T. & Zuñiga, M. Foraminíferos (Protozoa: Foraminifera) de la superfamilia Buliminacea Jones 1875, en


canales y fiordos Patagónicos, Chile. _An. Inst. Patagon._ 31, 55–74 (2003). Google Scholar  * Hromic, T. Distribución latitudinal de foraminíferos bentónicos (Protozoa: Foraminiferida) a


nivel de subórdenes y familias, en canales y fiordos patagónicos chilenos. _Invest. Mar., Valparaíso_ 34, 71–81 (2006). Google Scholar  * Hromic, T. Foraminíferos bentónicos recolectados


durante la expedición CIMAR 14 FIORDOS, Patagonia Chilena. _An. Inst. Patagon._ 39, 75–89 (2011). Google Scholar  * Hromic, T. Foraminíferos bentónicos de la expedición CIMAR 11 FIORDOS,


Canales Patagónicos Chilenos: Biodiversidad y abundancia. _Cienc. Tecnol. Mar_ 35, 49–70 (2012). Google Scholar  * Montiel, A., Gerdes, D. & Arntz, W. Polychaete assemblages on the


Magellan and Weddell Sea shelves: comparative ecological evaluation. _Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser._ 297, 189–202 (2005). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Montiel, A., Gerdes, D. & Arntz, W.


Distributional patterns of shallow-water polychaetes in the Magellan region: a zoogeographical and ecological synopsis. _Sci. Mar._ 69, 123–133 (2005). Article  Google Scholar  * Rozbaczylo,


N., Moreno, R., Díaz-Díaz, O. & Martínez, S. Poliquetos bentónicos submareales de fondos blandos de la región de Aysén, Chile: Clado Terebellida (Annelida, Polychaeta). _Cienc. Tecnol.


Mar_ 29, 71–90 (2006). Google Scholar  * Rozbaczylo, N., Moreno, R., Sepúlveda, R., Carrasco, F. & Mariscal, J. Poliquetos bentónicos de los Fiordos Magallánicos desde el Seno Reloncaví


hasta el Golfo de Corcovado (Chile). _Cienc. Tecnol. Mar_ 32, 101–112 (2009). Google Scholar  * Pequeño, G. & Olivera, F. Peces litorales de los canales de Aysén, capturados durante los


dos cruceros del proyecto CIMAR 9 FIORDOS, en el año 2003. _Cienc. Tecnol. Mar_ 30, 105–113 (2007). Google Scholar  * Osorio, C., Reid, D. G. & Ramajo, L. Moluscos en los canales del Sur


de Chile entre Boca del Guafo y Estero Elefantes (Cimar 7 Fiordos). _Cienc. Tecnol. Mar_ 28, 91–98 (2005). Google Scholar  * Mutschke, E., Rios, C., Aldea, C., Montiel, A. & Silva, F.


Biodiversidad marina en Magallanes: equinodermos del Pabellón de Colecciones Edmundo Pisano V. _An. Inst. Patagon._ 44, 23–33 (2016). Google Scholar  * Mutschke, E. Biodiversidad y


estructura de la comunidad macrobentónica en canales y fiordos australes. in _Avances en el conocimiento oceanográfico de las aguas interiores chilenas, Puerto Montt a cabo de Hornos_ (eds.


Silva, N. & Palma, S.) (Comité Oceanográfico Nacional, 2006). * Ríos, C., Mutschke, E., Montiel, A., Gerdes, D. & Arntz, W. E. Soft-bottom macrobenthic faunal associations in the


southern Chilean glacial fjord complex. _Sci. Mar._ 69, 225–236 (2005). Article  Google Scholar  * Zapata-Hernández, G. _et al_. Community structure and trophic ecology of megabenthic fauna


from the deep basins in the Interior Sea of Chiloé, Chile (41–43° S). _Cont. Shelf Res._ 130, 47–67 (2016). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Valdovinos, C. _et al_. Biodiversidad marina en el


norte de la Provincia Magallánica (43° 49′−41° 32′ S): composición y patrones espaciales de diversidad de moluscos submareales. _Cienc. Tecnol. Mar_ 31, 109–121 (2008). Google Scholar  *


Mansilla, A. _et al_. Macroalgas Marinas Bentónicas del Submareal Somero de la Ecorregión Subantártica de Magallanes, Chile. _An. Inst. Patagon._ 41, 51–64 (2013). Google Scholar  *


Mutschke, E., Gerdes, D. & Ríos, C. Distribution and abundance patterns of echinoderms in the fjord and channel complex from a subantarctic north Patagonian Ice field, Magellan region.


_Rev. Biol. Trop._ 65, 60–72 (2017). Article  Google Scholar  * Osorio, C., Peña, R., Ramajo, L. & Garcelón, N. Malacofauna bentónica de los canales oceánicos del Sur de Chile (43° −45°


S). _Cienc. Tecnol. Mar_ 29, 103–114 (2006). Google Scholar  * Ríos, C., Mutschke, E. & Montiel, A. Composición y Estructura de la Comunidad Macrobentónica en el Sitema Interior de


Canales y Fiordos del Extremo Austral de Chile. _An. Inst. Patagon._ 41, 74–86 (2013). Google Scholar  * Soto, E. H. _et al_. Biotopos marinos intermareales entre Canal Trinidad y Canal


Smyth, Sur de Chile. _Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr._ 47, 177–191 (2012). Article  Google Scholar  * Osorio, C. & Reid, D. G. Moluscos marinos intermareales y submareales entre la Boca del


Guafo y el Estero Elefantes, sur de Chile. _Invest. Mar., Valparaíso_ 32, 31–89 (2004). Google Scholar  * Hromic, T. Análisis de la comunidad foraminiferológica bentónica del seno Reloncaví,


islas Desertores, golfo Ancud y golfo Corcorvado, Chile. _Cienc. Tecnol. Mar_ 34, 67–80 (2011). Google Scholar  * Retamal, M. A. Nota sobre la biodiversidad carcinologica (Stomatopoda y


Decapoda) en los fiordos occidentales entre la boca del Guafo y estero Elefantes. _Cienc. Tecnol. Mar_ 30, 135–140 (2007). Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We acknowledge


the contribution of the project “Regional development strategies and public digital transformation: Development of supporting tools for assessment of future climate change scenarios in the


Chilean Patagonia” (FONDEF ID19I10236) developed in collaboration between CSIRO Chile Research Foundation, University of Magallanes (UMAG) and other institutions. We appreciate the kindness


of the personnel of the Hydrographic and Oceanographic Service of the Chilean Navy through Hydrographic and Oceanographic Data Centre for providing original reports and data (1st Lt. Claudio


Caro, Ms. Carolina Calvete, Ms. Patricia Álvarez and Mr. Juan Fierro). C.A. thanks the contribution of the project “Articulated System of Research on Climate Change & Sustainability in


Coastal Zones of Chile” (PFUE-RED21992) of the Ministry of Education of Chile. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS * Departamento de Ciencias y Recursos Naturales, Universidad de


Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile Cristian Aldea & Leslie Novoa * Centro de Investigación Gaia-Antártica, Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile Cristian Aldea * CSIRO Chile


Research Foundation, Santiago, Chile María Paz Acuña, Ignacia Acevedo-Romo & Francisco Bravo Authors * Cristian Aldea View author publications You can also search for this author


inPubMed Google Scholar * Leslie Novoa View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * María Paz Acuña View author publications You can also search for


this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Ignacia Acevedo-Romo View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Francisco Bravo View author publications


You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS C.A. gathered and systematized the literature, obtained the original sources of information, prepared and


transformed the original data to GBIF standards and created dataset metadata. He also wrote the Data Descriptor. L.N. collaborated directly in the entire process developed by C.A.,


especially in preparing and transforming the original data to GBIF standards. M.P.A. supervised data management and publication as well as metadata and Data Descriptor writing and figure


editing. I.A. collaborated in the technical validation of the data. F.B. supervised data management and publication as well as metadata and Data Descriptor writing. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR


Correspondence to Cristian Aldea. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature remains neutral


with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0


International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the


source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative


Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by


statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit


http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Aldea, C., Novoa, L., Acuña, M.P. _et al._ Benthic biota of Chilean fjords and


channels in 25 years of cruises of the National Oceanographic Committee. _Sci Data_ 10, 82 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-01990-x Download citation * Received: 01 September 2022


* Accepted: 27 January 2023 * Published: 09 February 2023 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-01990-x SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read


this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative


Trending News

Ambivalent role of bcl6 in cell survival and transformation

ABSTRACT The _BCL6_ gene is often structurally altered and probably ‘misregulated’ in two different types of human B-cel...

Systems biology and network pharmacology of frailty reveal novel epigenetic targets and mechanisms

ABSTRACT Frailty is an age-associated condition, characterized by an inappropriate response to stress that results in a ...

Grand designs kevin mccloud: always do this before you buy a house

Property expert Kevin McCloud is known for appearing on Channel 4 programme Grand Designs. The 59-year-old is currently ...

Census numbers terrible for rural texas

When the U.S. Census numbers appeared today, showing that the Texas Latino population had grown by 42 percent in a decad...

Pelvic floor tips every woman with urinary incontinence should know

Urinary incontinence is common but health experts said using pads should be the last option, especially as women can do ...

Latests News

Benthic biota of chilean fjords and channels in 25 years of cruises of the national oceanographic committee

ABSTRACT The CIMAR program (Marine Research Cruises to Remote Areas) run by the Chilean Navy through the National Oceano...

Apprentice's pamela's 'three different results' amid coronavirus fears

Founder of the beauty brand Moxi Loves, the Irish-born entrepreneur made it to the final of The Apprentice last year. Th...

Birmingham new street bus attack thug elderly man

Miguel Steward, 26, was serving a suspended sentence when he attacked the 68-year-old in the concourse area of Birmingha...

Chelsea prepare new lukaku transfer offer with 'return considered'

Chelsea are preparing a new bid for Romelu Lukaku, according to reports. Thomas Tuchel wants the Inter Milan star to lea...

After years of growth, the use of social media for news is falling across the world

People are becoming disenchanted with Facebook for news. The “Trump bump” appears to be sustaining itself. And younger p...

Top