Impact of marine processes on flow dynamics of northern Antarctic Peninsula outlet glaciers

Download PDF Matters Arising Open access Published: 11 June 2020 Impact of marine processes on flow dynamics of northern Antarctic Peninsula outlet glaciers Helmut Rott  ORCID:

orcid.org/0000-0003-4719-73761,2, Jan Wuite  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9333-15861, Jan De Rydt  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2978-87063, G. Hilmar Gudmundsson  ORCID:

orcid.org/0000-0003-4236-53693, Dana Floricioiu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1647-71914 & …Wolfgang Rack  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2447-377X5 Show authors Nature Communications volume 11,

Article number: 2969 (2020) Cite this article

3284 Accesses

13 Altmetric

Metrics details

Subjects Climate sciencesCryospheric science Matters Arising to this article was published on 11 June 2020

The Original Article was published on 20 September 2019

Arising from P. A. Tuckett et al., Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12039-2 (2019).

Tuckett et al.1 report on short-term events of ice flow acceleration on five outlet glaciers of the northern Antarctic Peninsula and their relation to numerical model output of surface melt.

The authors argue that the delivery of surface meltwater to the glacier bed transiently increases the basal water pressure and enhances basal motion, causing near-instantaneous flow

acceleration followed by subsequent drainage causing deceleration. An outdated version of the grounding line (GL) vector, separating grounded and floating glacier ice, is used so that the

majority of the analyzed velocity points are located on floating sections of glacier termini where meltwater drainage does not have any effect on subglacial water pressure. Our independent

analysis of glacier surface velocities exhibits for the speed-up events only marginal changes in velocity on grounded ice and a significant increase of velocity on floating glacier sections

progressing on prefrontal sea ice and ice mélange, clear evidence for the dominant influence of ocean dynamic forcing as previously reported by refs. 2,3,4.

The main data products used in ref. 1 are time series of 6-day mean velocities between October 2016 and April 2018 for glaciers discharging into the Larsen A embayment (Drygalski Glacier),

the Larsen B embayment (Crane, Hektoria, Jorum glaciers), and the Gerlache Strait (Cayley Glacier). Velocities are derived from 6-day repeat-pass radar satellite images of the Sentinel-1

mission, aggregated into 1 km squared boxes at distances 1 km up to 10 km upstream of the glacier fronts. The interpretation of the velocity data in terms of ice flow dynamics is critically

based on the assumption that the boxes are located on grounded ice. However, high-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) of the TanDEM-X satellite mission, acquired in mid-2011, −2013,

−2016 and the analysis of surface elevation change (SEC) show that major sections were afloat already in these years4. The authors used an outdated GL version, so that in total 24 out of the

36 velocity boxes shown are located on floating sections of glacier termini: all 10 velocity boxes on Hektoria Glacier, all six velocity boxes on Crane Glacier, three boxes on both 

Drygalski and Jorum glaciers and two boxes on Cayley Glacier.

In Fig. 1, we show the GL locations of Hektoria Glacier in 2013 and 2016, based on the break in slope in DEMs and on the SEC (Supplementary Figure 2). The glacier front advanced by 12 km

between 2011 and 2016. The floating section of the terminus covered in 2016 an area of 135 km2. The persistent sea ice cover since mid-2011 in the proglacial bay impeded calving, leading to

terminus advance whilst glacier thinning on grounded ice continued. Whereas the termini of Hektoria and Green glaciers extend into a wide bay, the tongues of the other studied glaciers are

narrower and laterally confined by mountain ridges. The floating parts of these glaciers extend several kilometers inland of the front along the center of the terminus, whereas the lateral

margins rest on slopes, as shown in Fig. 2d for Crane Glacier.

TanDEM-X DEM of Hektoria and Green glacier terminus, 2016-07-27, with coastlines in June 2011, June 2013 and July 2016, grounding lines (GL) in June 2013 and July 2016. Colour code for

altitude from 0 to ≥120 m a.s.l. The GL location is based on break in slope in the DEM and maps of surface elevation change 2013–20164. The black boxes show the sites of the velocity data of

ref. 1.

Velocity transects along central flowlines, extending from grounded ice to floating ice and ice mélange for Hektoria Glacier (a) and Crane Glacier (b) before, during and after the

acceleration event of 2017-03-26 to 2017-04-01. GLL – Location of the grounding line; CST – glacier front in 2011, 2013, 2016. c and d: Sections of Sentinel-1 image of 2017-04-01 showing the

location of the velocity transects on Hektoria Glacier (c) and Crane Glacier (d).

We generated ice velocity maps of Antarctic outlet glaciers since 2015, in 12- and 6-day time intervals, depending on data availability according to the Sentinel-1 operation plan5. Here, we

argue that the velocity time series provide clear evidence for the dominant impact of oceanic forcing during the acceleration events highlighted by ref. 1. The examples in Fig. 2 show a

distinct increase in the velocity magnitude along the central flowlines of Hektoria and Crane glaciers from grounded ice across the floating terminus and further on in the prefrontal ice

mélange and sea ice. In the absence of a solid sea ice cover (as for Cayley and Drygalski glaciers), the tracking of bergy bits and ice mélange provides estimates on prefrontal drift

velocities. The impact of strong off-shore winds and ocean currents during acceleration events is also evident in Sentinel-1 amplitude images, showing fast off-coast movement of ice mélange.

For example, the plume of ice touching the front of Drygalski Glacier on 21 March 2018 had been displaced 20 km eastward by 27 March 2018 (Supplementary Figure 3). Removal of ice mélange

causes significant short-term acceleration of marine-terminating glaciers6. Over the same time span, the young sea ice in front of the multiyear pack ice in the Larsen B embayment drifted

eastward by 15 km. Oceanic processes also have a large impact on multiannual variations of flow velocity and mass balance. Persistent multiannual sea ice in the Larsen A embayment (from

mid-2013 to 2016) and in the Larsen B embayment (since winter 2011) caused major decrease of flow velocities and the mass losses of grounded ice dropped from 9.73 Gt a−1 during 2011–2013 to

4.70 Gt a−1 during 2013–20164.

A further point of concern is the use of relative changes in velocity in ref. 1 as a basis for inferring conclusions about the sources for speed-up. First, it is unclear which criteria are

used for selecting the melt-induced acceleration events out of the full sample of velocity spikes coinciding with modeled surface melt. Second, the authors claim that a larger relative

increase in velocity closer to the glacier front would be needed if marine processes were the trigger for the speed-up. Beside this claim being based on relative velocity change, whereas any

flux and mass considerations must be based on actual velocities, no quantitative analysis is provided to support this statement. In addition, the assumption that surface meltwater of the

transient events finds its way to the glacier bed and causes an increase of subglacial water pressure is speculative and not relevant for floating ice. Apart from melt intensity, the

freezing state of the snow/firn/ice body needs to be taken into account. The Larsen outlet glaciers have cold snow/ice bodies in which a substantial portion of the meltwater released at the

surface would freeze, in particular after cold periods7. Estimates on the intensity and spatial extent of melt events can be deduced from C-band backscatter signatures8. For example, the

event in March 2018 shows a modest decrease of the backscatter intensity on only one date (27 March 2018), indicating a short period of modest surface melt not able to release sufficient

water for drainage to the glacier bed.

Another critical issue is the neglect of biases in the retrieved velocities caused by shifts in the radar line-of-sight (LOS) distance by several meters owing to changes in radar signal

penetration associated with change from dry to wet snow and vice versa. Depending on the flow direction relative to LOS, this shift causes an underestimation or overestimation of the

velocity (Supplementary Note 1). The Sentinel-1 data used in the study are from descending orbits so that the transition from dry to wet snow introduces a decrease of velocity for glaciers,

heading west and an increase for glaciers heading east, as evident in the different timing of apparent acceleration on Cayley and Drygalski glaciers (Supplementary Figure 1).

The issues addressed above question the interpretation of the presented material in terms of melt-induced acceleration. Our analysis of velocity time series on grounded and floating glacier

sections and the motion of proglacial sea ice and ice mélange confirm the findings of previous publications that changes in velocity and ice export of northern Antarctic Peninsula outlet

glaciers during recent years have been primarily governed by frontal stress perturbations propagating up-glacier and by variations in oceanic boundary conditions.

Data generated during the study are included in the supplementary information files. Specifications and public availability of additional data (surface topography and ice velocity) generated

for previous studies and used in support of this study are detailed in ref. 4.

References Tuckett, P. A. et al. Rapid accelerations of Antarctic Peninsula outlet glaciers driven by surface melt. Nat. Commun. 10, 4311 (2019).

Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Scambos, T. A. et al. Detailed ice loss pattern in the northern Antarctic Peninsula: widespread decline driven by ice front retreats. Cryosphere 8, 2135–2145 (2014).

Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Wuite, J. et al. Evolution of surface velocities and ice discharge of Larsen B outlet glaciers from 1995 to 2013. Cryosphere 9, 957–969 (2015).

Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Rott, H. et al. Changing pattern of ice flow and mass balance for glaciers discharging into the Larsen A and B embayments, Antarctic Peninsula, 2011 to 2016. Cryosphere 12, 1273–1291 (2018).

Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Time Series of Ice Flow and Calving Flux Data, Antarctica, https://cryoportal.enveo.at/iv/ (2020).

Walter, J. I. et al. Oceanic mechanical forcing of a marine-terminating Greenland glacier. Ann. Glaciol. 53, 181–192 (2012).

Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Bøggild, C. E., Forsberg, R. & Reeh, N. Meltwater retention in a transect across the Greenland ice sheet. Ann. Glaciol. 40, 169–173 (2005).

Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Luckman, A. et al. Surface melt and ponding on Larsen C Ice Shelf and the impact of föhn winds. Antarct. Sci. 26, 625–625 (2014).

Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author informationAuthors and Affiliations ENVEO IT GmbH, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria

Helmut Rott & Jan Wuite

Institute of Atmospheric and Cryospheric Sciences, University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria

Helmut Rott

Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK

Jan De Rydt & G. Hilmar Gudmundsson

Institute for Remote Sensing Technology, German Aerospace Center, Oberpfaffenhofen, 82234, Wessling, Germany

Dana Floricioiu

Gateway Antarctica, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand

Wolfgang Rack

AuthorsHelmut RottView author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Jan WuiteView author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Jan De RydtView author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

G. Hilmar GudmundssonView author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Dana FloricioiuView author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Wolfgang RackView author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

H.R. conceived the study approach and wrote the first version of the manuscript. J.W. processed the ice velocity data and prepared the figures. H.R, J.W., J.D.R., G.H.G., D.F., and W.R.

contributed to data analysis and compiled the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author Correspondence to Helmut Rott.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

InformationDescription of Additional Supplementary FilesSupplementary Data 1Supplementary Data 2Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or

format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or

other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in

the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the

copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this articleCite this article Rott, H., Wuite, J., De Rydt, J. et al. Impact of marine processes on flow dynamics of northern Antarctic Peninsula outlet glaciers. Nat Commun 11, 2969

(2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16658-y

Download citation

Received: 20 November 2019

Accepted: 15 May 2020

Published: 11 June 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16658-y

Share this article Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative