Reply to ‘evidence for simple volcanic rifting not complex subduction initiation in the laxmi basin’

Nature

Reply to ‘evidence for simple volcanic rifting not complex subduction initiation in the laxmi basin’"

Play all audios:

Loading...

REPLYING TO Clift et al. _Nature Communications_ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16569-y (2020) Pandey et al.1 proposed relict subduction initiation in the Laxmi Basin (LB) as a viable


alternative to numerous competing tectonic models for the evolution of western Indian margin. We thank Clift et al.2 for their interest in our study. They contend that basalts from volcanic


rifted margins may also exhibit analogous geochemical signatures. However, we do not agree with their views for several reasons. Clift et al.2 argue that enrichments in certain elements such


as Th, U, Pb and Sr, typical of subduction magmatism, may also imply possible crustal assimilation. However, they2 overlooked the extent of such enrichments. In fact, the scale of Th


enrichments for both lava types differ almost by an order of magnitude2. Low average Th/Yb ratios for LB (~0.2) are linked to a shallower source, e.g., mid-ocean ridge basalt (MORB), similar


to subduction related ophiolites3. In contrast, rifted margin basalts exhibit much higher Th/Yb ratios (>1) pointing at much deeper sources e.g., ocean island basalts. Similarly, TiO2/Yb


vs. Nb/Yb systematics2 of the LB and IBM forearc both overlap significantly with notably low TiO2 contents—distinct from volcanic margin basalts. Clift et al.2 further state that Nd/Sr


isotopes may indicate continental input instead of subduction initiation (SI)1 during its petrogenesis. Their contention is, however, inconsistent when examined with existing isotopic data.


Average εNd values4 of lower and upper continental crust are −10 and −20 respectively while global subducting sediments (GLOSS) is restricted below −5. In contrast, LB lavas, having εNd


values between +6 to +8, are very close to Depleted Mantle. Moreover, average Ba concentrations of continental crust, LB lava and Muslim Bagh ophiolites are ~259, 140 and 110 ppm4


respectively4. Therefore, isotopic, total trace and rare earth elements (REE) characteristics of LB lava are akin to SI, instead of volcanic margins. Although Clift et al.2 did not include


isotopic data for comparison, we suspect that the 87Sr/86Sr values from rifted volcanic margins would be significantly higher than the modest LB lava values (7037–0.7044), which are similar


to Neotethyan ophiolites and forearc lavas1. Highly mobile elements (e.g., Rb, Sr, Ba, U) are concentrated into aqueous slab-derived fluids, whereas Th and other light rare earth elements


(LREE) are partitioned into sediment-derived melts5,6,7. Enrichment in Ba and to minor extent Th again points towards SI. Similarly, Ba/Th vs. Th variations1 show evidence of shallow,


fluid-derived enrichments8. Using unaltered MORB dataset of Jenner and O’Neill9, one can clearly see enrichment of Ba in LB lava relative to MORB. Often Sr and Ba additions can result from


seawater hydrothermal alteration processes, however LB lavas show no discernible correlation between Sr, Ba and Loss on ignition (_R_2 = 0.01 for both). In fact, samples with the lowest loss


on ignition values, exhibit the highest Ba. This implies that the high Ba relative to MORB of the LB lavas, similar to the Muslim Bagh ophiolite, is a primary feature of LB lavas and the


result of shallow slab-derived fluid input and not seawater alteration. The most important distinction between LB and volcanic margin basalts come from REE signatures, which Clift et al.


have ignored2. LB lavas exhibit highly depleted LREEs and low total REEs in contrast to volcanic margin lava (see Fig. 1). Crustal inputs at volcanic margins typically result in


significantly elevated concentrations of large ion lithophile elements and LREEs, which are absent in LB (Fig. 1). A plot of chondrite normalized [La/Yb]_N_ ratios vs. SiO2 (Fig. 2) also


highlights differences with significantly higher [La/Yb]_N_ values for North Atlantic Igneous Province lavas (~0.6 to as high as 30) in comparison to LB lavas (~0.6–1.4). The lack of LREE


enrichments in LB lava (similar to forearc basalts of the IBM with [La/Yb]_N_ less than 1.4) is therefore noteworthy. Furthermore, boninitic-like lava from LB exhibit characteristic U-shaped


REE profiles which are primarily attributed to proto-forearc and forearc environments10. Further, TiO2 is among the least mobile elements and compared to other trace elements, solubility of


TiO2 is very low in common mantle or subduction zone fluids. TiO2 concentrations may depend on the rate of crystallization of Fe-Ti phases. With respect to high LREE, Th/Yb and enrichment


of Ti, we argue that the LREE (and HREE) enrichments relative to MREE seen in U-shaped REE profiles is typical of boninitic-like lavas and is not related to crustal contamination or


alteration. Prior studies from this region envisaged numerous intra-oceanic weak zones at ~70 Ma (see Pandey et al.1). Rapid northward drift of India coupled with frequent rotations since


the late Cretaceous period is well established. After its spectacular journey from the southern latitudes, India presently resides in the northern hemisphere. Accordingly, considerable


amount of missing/unaccounted for crust in the NW Indian Ocean inferred by kinematic modelling implies synchronous compressional tectonics in this region (see Pandey et al.1). Clift et


al.2’s comments are largely drawn from a particular school of thoughts based on indirect geophysical models proposed well before drilling in LB in 2015. Using same regional seismic


profiles11,12,13 different groups interpret Laxmi ridge and basin variably either as continental/oceanic crust. Equivocal crustal models remained inconclusive about whether this margin is a


magma rich or magma poor type. Likewise, sporadic intra-basement magmatic reflections on seismic profiles are interpreted as seaward dipping reflectors (SDR)/axial anomalies/extinct


spreading centres/volcanic flows/ intrusives etc1, 11,12,13. No precise knowledge is available regarding basin-wide extent of SDRs in the LB, in contrast to what is reported by Clift et al2.


Therefore, a sweeping portrayal2 of SDRs in LB and surrounding regions appears to be conjectural. Identification of a proto-trench would require detailed morphological and crustal imaging


of the region, in time and space, which was beyond the scope of Pandey et al1. Clift et al.2 further link formation of the Laxmi ridge to that of the Saurashtra Volcanic Province. Due to


inconclusive interpretations and lack of any samples/rocks/data from both regions, we prefer not to speculate about its precise affinity. However, geochemical signatures of LB lava are


categorically different from that of Deccan volcanics14. Two-dimensional flexural modeling primarily dealt with post-rift evolution of the LB (awaiting geochemical results from Site U1457)


and confirmed significant residual bathymetry in LB and surrounding regions (~2-3 km at ~61 Ma). This means that any prior magmatism must have occurred under considerably deep-water


settings, in consonance with shipboard observations about rapid quenching of the LB basalts after their emplacement. Regional crustal uplift however, would depend upon several factors


including the onset, extent and duration of the impingement of a potential thermal regime. Finally, we would like to conclude by pointing out that our study1 reports direct data from LB


through crustal sampling for the first time. Geochemical and isotopic imprints of LB lava distinctly imply relict subduction initiation. Therefore, new findings based on direct observations


cannot be undermined merely to support specific geophysical models. Indeed, additional regional basement sampling, radiometric dating and revised plate kinematic modelling would provide


important insights about the complexity of the western Indian margin. DATA AVAILABILITY No new data are reported in this manuscript. See Pandey et al.1 and Clift et al.2 for data sources


related to Fig. 1 and 2. REFERENCES * Pandey, D. K., Pandey, A. & Whattam, S. A. Relict subduction initiation along a passive margin in the northwest Indian Ocean. _Nat. Commun._ 10,


2248 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10227-8 (2019). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Clift, P. et al. Evidence for simple volcanic rifting not complex subduction initiation in the Laxmi


Basin. _Nat. Commun._ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16569-y (2019). * Whattam, S. A. & Stern, R. The “subduction initiation rule”: a key for linking ophiolites, intra-oceanic arcs


and subduction initiation. _Contributions Mineral. Petrol._ 162, 1031–1045 (2011). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Rudnick, R. & Gao, S. in _Composition of the Continental Crust_.


(ed Rudnick, R. L.) 1–64 (Treat, Geochm, 2005). * Elliott, T. et al. Element transport from slab to volcanic front at the Mariana arc _Jour_. _Geophys. Res._ 102, 14991–15019 (1997). Article


  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  * Hawkesworth, C. et al. Elemental U and Th variations in island arc rocks: implications for U-series isotopes. _Chem. Geol._ 139, 207–221 (1997). Article  ADS 


CAS  Google Scholar  * Singer, B. S. et al. Along-strike trace element and isotopic variation in Aleutian Island Arc basalt: subduction melts sediments and dehydrates serpentine. _Jour.


Geophys. Res_ 112, B06206 (2007). Article  ADS  Google Scholar  * Pearce, J. A. et al. Geochemical mapping of the Mariana arc-basin system: implications for the nature and distribution of


subduction components. _Geochem., Geophysics, Geosystems_ 6, Q07006 (2005). ADS  Google Scholar  * Jenner, F. E. & O’Neill, H. S. C. Analysis of 60 elements in 616 ocean floor basaltic


glasses. _Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst._ 13, Q02005 (2012). ADS  Google Scholar  * Reagan, M. K. et al. Fore-arc basalts and subduction initiation in the Izu- Bonin-Mariana system. _Geochem.


Geophys. Geosyst._ 11, Q03X12 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  * Corfield, R. I. et al. Variability in the crustal structure of the West Indian Continental Margin in the Northern Arabian


Sea. _Pet. Geosci._ 16, 257–265 (2010). Article  Google Scholar  * Calvès G. et al. Seismic volcanostratigraphy of the western Indian rifted mar- gin: the pre-Deccan igneous province. _J.


Geophys. Res. Solid Earth_ 116, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB000862. (2011). * Misra, A. A., Sinha, N. & Mukherjee, S. Repeat ridge jumps and microcontinent separation: insights from NE


Arabian Sea. _Mar. Pet. Geol._ 59, 406–428 (2015). Article  Google Scholar  * Melluso et al. Constraints on the mantle sources of the Deccan Traps from the petrology and geochemistry of the


basalts of the Gujarat state, western India. _J. Petrol._ 36, 1393–1432 (1995). Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar  Download references ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS DP acknowledges financial support


from the Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), India bearing Grant number: MoES/PO(Seismo)/3(45)2012. This is NCPOR contribution number #J-03/2020-21. AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND


AFFILIATIONS * National Centre for Polar & Ocean Research, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Vasco da Gama, Goa, 403804, India Dhananjai K. Pandey * H-V-3, NCPOR Campus, Vasco da Gama, Goa,


403804, India Anju Pandey * Department of Geosciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia Scott A. Whattam Authors * Dhananjai K. Pandey View


author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Anju Pandey View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar * Scott A.


Whattam View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar CONTRIBUTIONS All authors (D.P., A.P. and S.W.) contributed to the discussion of the content of


this manuscript. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Correspondence to Dhananjai K. Pandey. ETHICS DECLARATIONS COMPETING INTERESTS The authors declare no competing interests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PEER


REVIEW INFORMATION _Nature Communications_ thanks Cathy Busby and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. PUBLISHER’S NOTE Springer Nature


remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS OPEN ACCESS This article is licensed under a Creative Commons


Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original


author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the


article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use


is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit


http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Pandey, D.K., Pandey, A. & Whattam, S.A. Reply to ‘Evidence for simple volcanic


rifting not complex subduction initiation in the Laxmi Basin’. _Nat Commun_ 11, 2734 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16570-5 Download citation * Received: 28 August 2019 *


Accepted: 07 May 2020 * Published: 01 June 2020 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16570-5 SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this


content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative


Top