Managing dental caries against the backdrop of COVID-19: approaches to reduce aerosol generation

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in severe limitation and closure of dental practices in many countries. Outside of the acute (peak) phases of the disease, dentistry has begun to be practised

again. However, there is emerging evidence that SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted via airborne routes, carrying implications for dental procedures that produce aerosol. At the time of writing,

additional precautions are required when a procedure considered to generate aerosol is undertaken.

This paper aims to present evidence-based treatments that remove or reduce the generation of aerosols during the management of carious lesions. It maps aerosol generating procedures (AGPs),

where possible, to alternative non-AGPs or low AGPs. This risk reduction approach overcomes the less favourable outcomes associated with temporary solutions or extraction-only approaches.

Even if this risk reduction approach for aerosol generation becomes unnecessary in the future, these procedures are not only suitable but desirable for use as part of general dental care

post-COVID-19.

Uncertainty and the emerging evidence that SARS-CoV-2 may be transmitted via airborne routes has implications for practising dental procedures that generate aerosols.

There are evidence-based treatments including use of high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants, atraumatic restorative treatment, silver diamine fluoride, the Hall Technique and resin

infiltration, which remove or reduce aerosol generation during the management of carious lesions.

This risk reduction approach for aerosol generation may guide practitioners to overcome the less favourable outcomes associated with temporary solutions or extraction-only approaches in

caries management.

The novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has precipitated the COVID-19 pandemic. The World Health Organisation (WHO)1 has recommended a

society-wide quarantine approach (during acute or peak phases of the disease), social distancing and handwashing followed by contact tracing. Alongside this, most countries have suspended

elective and non-urgent dental care,2,3 closing many practices with only emergency treatment provision.4,5,6 This acute phase of the pandemic is subsiding, although further acute phases are

being seen in different countries. There is increasing dental need across populations and dental practices are suffering financially, so practices are opening and commencing care. However,

the WHO has taken a cautious and risk assessment approach and recommended that situations where aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) are carried out should be reduced to a minimum, with

additional precautions in place.

It is still controversial but there is growing concern over possible airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2.4,5,6,7 Although there has been much written about possible spread of COVID-19

through aerosols generated in the dental surgery, reviews of the evidence show there is little directly relating to respiratory viruses, despite over 70 years of research into bio-aerosols

in dental settings.8,9,10,11 Studies of microbial content of aerosols and splatter generated during dental procedures have mostly involved aerobic bacteria.9,10,11,12,13,14,15 Viral studies

are sparse, focusing on blood-borne HIV and hepatitis B.8,16 This limits confidence in the assumptions around transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during dental treatment. Although there seems to be

little supporting evidence for mass transmission of respiratory pathogens through provision of dental care in the past, evidence is still emerging around transmission of this novel virus,

where there is no innate immunity in the global population.

In general, management of dental caries has traditionally involved using instruments that have potential to generate bio-aerosols containing saliva, blood and tooth debris; the high-speed

air rotor,17,18,19,20,21 slow-speed handpiece22,23,24 and use of the air-water syringe to complete steps for most dental materials.16,17,25,26

Until uncertainty around the level of risk associated with SARS-CoV-2 transmission between dental staff and patients is resolved or an acceptable level of risk is agreed, and because many

aspects of dental treatment generate aerosols, a precautionary position is to keep aerosol generation as low as possible.

This paper presents evidence-based management for dental caries that removes or reduces the generation of aerosols and aids personalised care planning based around AGP reduction.

Although they are changing frequently, in response to evidence, we have set this paper against a background of local, national and international standards and recommendations. These include

use of patient flow and environment cleaning processes, and standard and enhanced PPE use, as well as other measures put in place to practice safely practice while COVID-19 is still a health

threat. Dental professionals are familiar with infection control strategies, but after an outbreak of a highly infective, potentially airborne-transmitted virus, extra protective measures

have to be adopted. In this time of emerging evidence resulting in constant change, these measures should continue to be in line with national and local regulations, with vigilance to

changes and by reference to Public Health England.

The paper will consider the alignment of traditional AGPs for caries management with 'non-AGPs' and 'low AGPs' (see Tables 1 and 2). Non-AGPs are those that generally do not include steps

that generate aerosols, such as the use of rotary instruments and air-water syringes where air and water are used together in a spray, or procedures that can be modified to be carried out in

a way that does not generate aerosols and compromise the quality of the procedure. Low AGPs are those that also contain steps that might generate a lower amount of aerosol, such as the

air-water syringe where the air and water are used independently of one another. Non-AGPs still have potential for salivary contamination and low AGPs may need the air-water syringe in some

instances. However, there is less aerosol produced if the water is used to wash without combining it with air to give a spray.16,26 Use of rubber dam with sealing around tooth holes and

high-volume evacuation help minimise risk. Because of the possibility of viral load in the blood of COVID-19-positive patients, it is preferable to avoid pulpal exposures. The non-invasive

and minimally invasive procedures, such as selectively removing carious tissues during atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and the Hall Technique (HT), are discussed below and make pulp

exposures less likely. However, if a pulp exposure did look likely during caries removal, an indirect pulp cap should be considered.

The procedures discussed here are based around minimal intervention dentistry approaches, aiming to maintain the dentition throughout the course of life by handling the disease, dental

caries, in a biological manner; treating the cause and not just its symptoms (the carious lesions).27

The non-AGPs and low AGPs for managing carious lesions can be grouped into:

Control the disease - prevention, early detection and managing the carious lesion (whether confined to enamel or cavitated) through controlling the biofilm, by making the lesion cleansable

with non-restorative cavity control (NRCC) or by removing the plaque and using chemicals to stop its progress and promote remineralisation (commonly silver diamine fluoride [SDF]; topical

fluoride)

Cover and seal the biofilm and carious lesion - involves no caries removal and creates a seal to deprive the carious biofilm of nutrients, oxygen etc, causing the carious lesion to arrest,

such as fissure sealing and resin infiltration for non-cavitated lesions and the HT

Carious tissue removal - only decomposed, infected dentine and unsupported demineralised enamel should be removed selectively using hand instruments (eg ART and/or chemo-mechanical caries

removal [CMCR]).

The online supplementary information file details further sources and some video tutorials of these techniques.

Primary preventive approaches (also known as non-invasive strategies for the management of caries) can reduce the risk of progressive dental tissue loss and avoid the need for treatments

using rotary instruments. The main preventive approaches have to be through the community and home, with behavioural components such as sugar restriction, plaque removal and oral health

education. Clinicians hold a pivotal role in supporting oral health behaviours.

For remineralisation, fluoride-based agents are accepted as the primary medicament. Although there is less supporting evidence, other remineralisation agents such as self-assembling peptide

P11-428 might be considered.

Preventive sealants cover plaque-retentive areas, occlusal fissures and pits, which are most vulnerable to caries.29,30 However, resin-based sealants involve a washing step to remove the

acid etch thoroughly, generating some aerosol. Nevertheless, this risk can be avoided by using low-viscosity or high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement (LVGICS/HVGIC) and excess material can be

removed with hand instruments. A Cochrane review found no difference in the preventive effect of resin, LVGIC or HVGIC sealants.30

The purpose of treating dental caries is primarily to stop its progression within the tooth as well as restoring the lost dental hard tissues when needed. Early detection of carious lesions

will reduce the need for aerosol-producing restorative care required for advanced lesions. In addition, patients with active dental caries need to have their disease risks addressed as part

of the long-term disease management.31,32

NRCC is a method of using 'cleaning' to prevent biofilm maturation and carious lesions progression. It can be used for dentinal carious lesions in the primary and permanent dentition, root

carious lesions and cavitated coronal smooth surface lesions.

By making the carious surface accessible and having plaque frequently and thoroughly removed, the carious process will arrest.

In primary teeth, the effectiveness of NRCC in medium and large cavities together with ART restorations in small cavities has been tested in comparison to amalgam and ART restorations.33

Tooth survival after 3.5 years was 89% and not significantly different from either amalgam (91%) or ART restorations (90%), and in a randomised control trial of occluso-proximal cavitated

lesions, survival (of pulp and tooth) was 92% at 2.5 years compared to 98% for teeth treated with the HT.34 NRCC has a less robust evidence base than the other treatment options discussed in

this paper, with most of the reports of success being related to particular situations and carried out by dentists who support this technique. The choice to use NRCC is less dependent on

the shape or type of lesion than it is on the attitude of the patient towards prevention and the skill of the dentist in behaviour change.35

Working with the patient to make plaque control more successful (improving oral hygiene procedure/habits). The patient has to be ready to change behaviours that led to development of the

disease in the first place. Success depends on the clinician's ability to change the patient's (or in the case of a child, the parent's) behaviour towards taking responsibility. So,

'prevention' becomes very much more than simply providing instruction of what to do (knowledge) and how to do it (skills), but has to involve an aspect of refocusing the patient to feeling

empowered to make a difference to their own oral health (attitude). Daily removal or disruption of the biofilm by brushing with a fluoridated toothpaste will slow down the carious process

and can even halt it

Creating a cavity shape where the carious biofilm/dentine is accessible to a toothbrush (lesion exposure). In some cases, overhanging enamel has to be removed. To avoid use of rotary

instruments, hand instruments can be used to gain access to the lesion (see ART)

Treatment with 38% SDF and/or a 5% NaF varnish therapy to reduce carious activity and promote remineralisation.33 These additional measures can support success of the NRCC approach if the

carious lesion is active or there is increased risk that carious lesion activity will recur.

In the primary dentition, the goal is to avoid the lesion causing pain and/or infection until the tooth exfoliates. For the permanent dentition, with grossly broken down teeth, root carious

lesions or coronal smooth surface lesions, the main goal is to avoid the lesions leading to pain and/or infection while also avoiding or delaying the need for restoration.

SDF is a clear, colourless liquid that arrests active cavitated carious lesions and remineralises demineralised enamel and dentine.36 Some products have a blue tint, but these are not

available in the UK. Although licensed to treat dentine sensitivity in the UK and some other countries, it is more usually used 'off-label' to arrest carious lesions. It turns active carious

lesions black; therefore, consent to treatment must be obtained and it must be handled with care as it will temporarily stain skin, mucosa and most surfaces on contact.

SDF is an effective way of treating active lesions for primary and permanent teeth (coronal dentine and root).37,38 It can be used opportunistically while the patient is in the dental chair

by applying to other high-risk surfaces. SDF is effective in arresting early childhood caries39 and exposed root surfaces.40 It is more successful when used in cleansable lesions and

accessible areas of the mouth.41 When caries is more severe or affects multiple teeth, repeated applications of SDF controls the disease (for example, applied after two weeks and six weeks,

then six months as required).42

SDF penetrates infected dentine,43 making the lesion twice as hard as healthy dentine.44 It produces a dense superficial layer and fills in micro-cavities with solid metallic silver.45 It

also acts directly on the plaque biofilm,46,47 inhibiting bacterial growth.48,49 Removing carious tissue before SDF application is not necessary as it does not improve caries arrest.50

SDF has been shown to have some effect in preventing carious lesions in primary teeth, with one review showing that, by applying it at least once per year, 61% of new caries lesions might be

prevented.51 SDF is clinically effective as well as cost-effective, and has the advantage of combined use with all other caries management techniques.51,52

Carious tissue is not removed at all. To minimise droplet and aerosol production, the surface is dried with cotton instead of compressed air, then SDF is applied using a micro brush.

Arresting lesions using SDF can provide a solid foundation for restorations53,54 and can be combined with ART in primary or permanent teeth or the HT. There are currently no clinical trials

of efficacy, so combinations may be thought of as a 'belt and braces' approach to synergise the benefits of both treatments.

Sealant materials can control non-cavitated lesions on occlusal surfaces where there is no significant breach in the surface integrity of the tooth, even if the lesion can be seen clinically

(through shadowing), or radiographically, to extend into dentine.55,56,57,58,59,60 These are also known as micro-invasive treatments.

As well as being highly effective for prevention of dental caries,30 placing a well-sealed fissure sealant over a carious lesion will arrest it and stop it from progressing.57,58,59,60

While shallow or moderately deep lesions are likely to be successfully managed, there is not enough evidence to make recommendations for deeper lesions for long-term management. Although

they may provide a good seal, they will not add much to the strength of the tooth. Their application is limited to teeth where there is less weakening of the tooth structure (that is, less

extensive lesions) and the tooth structure can support them. In cases where the lesion is extensive, the sealant may not be able to withstand breakdown of the lesion surface if the forces

are high.

Although they have a lower retention rate than resin sealants, the therapeutic effect of GIC on the tooth seems to balance the bulk material loss. There is good evidence to support a high

caries-preventive effect from high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants.30 However, there is little directly comparable evidence, as yet, on their relative performances sealing dentinal carious

lesions.

Resin fissure sealant application involves use of the air-water syringe, creating an aerosol. Clinicians could consider using GIC or HVGIC ART sealants instead, as these do not require

rinsing or desiccation for placement, to prevent further progression of lesions. More long-term treatment may be required later, but there may be sufficient success from the sealant to allow

it to be managed by re-sealing rather than replacing with a restoration.

Resin infiltration (RI) is a technique that arrests non-cavitated carious lesions.61,62 It can treat non-cavitated lesions on smooth and approximal surfaces in both dentitions effectively.

Lesions have to be limited to enamel and the outer third of dentine.61,62,63,64,65 It can also camouflage the whitish appearance of hypomineralised enamel on smooth surfaces.62,64 Similar to

sealants, this is also known as a micro-invasive treatment.

A very low-viscosity resin infiltrate is introduced into the micro-porosities of carious lesions to fill them through capillary action and arrest their progress.65 Systematic reviews show RI

to be an effective micro-invasive treatment at timespans up to 36 months.61,65

The diffusion of the RI results from surface and sub-surface dehydration conditions created by hydrochloric acid followed by ethanol. The air-water syringe has to be used to rinse and dry

which may produce aerosols. Rubber dam, sealing material and high-volume evacuators should be used.5,66

The HT is a method for treating asymptomatic carious primary molar teeth where the lesion has extended into dentine (cavitated or non-cavitated). The correct size of preformed metal crown is

chosen and then pushed over the tooth to seal the carious lesion.67

The HT has been used in some secondary care settings for temporary management of partially erupted permanent molars affected by molar incisor hypomineralisation. However, there are currently

no clinical trials to support this use. If practitioners are considering using the HT as a temporary non-AGP measure for permanent molar teeth, there are a few points, besides the lack of

supporting evidence, that they should consider. Firstly, the crowns should only be placed on teeth that are not yet in occlusion. Secondly, the HT in this cas , unlike primary teeth HT use,

provides only a temporary solution until more definitive restorative treatment and this will necessitate an AGP to remove the crown. Finally, permanent tooth preformed crowns are less easy

to fit than those for primary teeth and almost always need to be trimmed with scissors, crimped and polished.

It provides full coronal coverage and the risk of future carious lesion development on another surface of the tooth is avoided.67

The HT is technically simple to carry out and is well accepted by children, their parents and dentists.68,69 It has a strong evidence base showing high long-term success rates in randomised

control trials (>90%) compared to conventional restorations (50-80%) and comparable to conventional crowns.68,69,70 The high rate of success, its durability and cost-effectiveness have meant

use of the HT has increased, with a recent survey including 709 paediatric dentists from six continents showed that 92% had heard about it and 51% were using it.71

The HT is AGP-free as there is no removal of carious tissue and no tooth preparation. No local anaesthesia is required. The luting cement is GIC. As with all clinical procedures, careful

case selection with accurate lesion and pulp status diagnoses (clinically and radiographically) are essential for success. Parents have to be happy with the appearance before placement,

although children generally like the crown's appearance.

ART involves using hand instruments to access carious lesions through enamel and to remove a selected amount of demineralised dental tissues. This is also known as a minimally invasive

treatment.

ART restorations with HVGIC have shown high success in long-term follow-up studies for single surfaces, in the primary and permanent dentitions, with meta-analyses showing weighted mean

annual failure percentages of 5% in primary molars over the first three years, and 4.1% over the first five years in permanent posterior teeth.29 However, there are not enough studies on

multi-surface restorations in the permanent dentition to recommend it as a long-term strategy yet. A recent systematic review reported no significant differences in survival percentages

between ART and traditionally produced multiple-surface restorations in primary molars,72,73 and for single-surface restorations in primary molars and posterior permanent teeth.73

Large-sized multi-surface ART/HVGIC restorations in primary molars were less successful because of poor restorative material performance rather than the caries removal technique. However,

ART may be a good short-term strategy for large multi-surface cavities or for stabilising the dentitions before other restorative interventions.

ART involves no rotary, aerosol-producing instruments during opening of the cavity and selective removal of the carious tissue. ART's success is determined not only by the shape and the

sharpness of the hand instruments, but also the technique used as well as the knowledge of the affected dental tissues and experience of the dental practitioner.

In some deeper lesions in permanent teeth, stepwise carious tissue removal may have been the treatment of choice but involves a second high-speed air rotor step to remove the restoration.

Therefore, following selective carious tissue removal, a restoration designed to last in the long term should be placed. The restoration seal should be checked and maintained as necessary on

a regular basis.

Currently, there are sodium hypochlorite-based and enzyme-based CMCR agents in the market. A recent systematic review found CMCR time-consuming, but effective, for caries removal.74 The

manufacturer's recommendations are that the caries removal agents are washed out, but could well be removed with spoon instruments and cleaned with wet cotton pellets.

The majority of carious lesions in children and young adults can be treated with non-AGP measures because they are usually the first lesion on a tooth. One of the difficulties with applying

non-AGPs in adults is that most lesions occur in relation to a failing restoration (previously known as secondary caries) and it does not seem possible to remove restorative materials

without using rotary instruments and creating aerosols. However, repairing existing restorations rather than replacing them should be considered where possible.

Treatments that remove or reduce the generation of aerosols during the management of carious lesions can allow a successful risk reduction approach and are still effective.

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: