Foundations of mathematical genetics (2nd edn).

Nature

Foundations of mathematical genetics (2nd edn)."


Play all audios:

Loading...

Foundations of Mathematical Genetics (2nd edn). Anthony W. F. Edwards. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2000. Pp. 121. Price £12.95, paperback. ISBN 0 521 77544 2. This book is


essentially a reprint of the first edition (published 1977) but with the important addition of a final chapter on ‘Fisher’s Fundamental Theorem of natural selection’. The book’s scope is


much narrower than its title implies. It gives a detailed mathematical analysis of selection models with discrete generations of random mating and constant genotypic viabilities. Successive


chapters are devoted to analysing models for the following genetic systems: two alleles at a single locus; multiple alleles; sex-linkage; and two diallelic loci. The treatment is entirely


mathematical: theorems are stated and rigorously proved. Apart from the final chapter on the recent interpretation of Fisher’s Fundamental Theorem, the rest of the book concerns material


most of which had been published before 1970. There is little discussion of the biological justification for the models or how they may be used to estimate selection parameters from


observational data. In spite of its purely mathematical approach, the book carries an important message, still widely ignored, for all evolutionary biologists. Great emphasis is placed on


conditions for equilibrium and changes in mean viability. The chapter on many alleles at a single locus gives results all evolutionary biologists should be familiar with, even if the proofs,


set out in an elegant matrix algebra, are passed by. Edwards gives rigorous proof that mean viability always increases at a multiallelic locus with constant viabilities. Provided this


represents an ‘internal’ equilibrium (where a number of different alleles remain in the population), it will be a point of globally stable equilibrium. This is the most general model for


which proof has been obtained that a population ‘climbs an adaptive peak’ to a point of maximum fitness. Even for the simplest two-locus, two-allele model with constant viability, Moran


(1964) proved that mean viability does not maximize: counter examples can easily be constructed showing decreasing mean viability. Yet still, the textbooks — for example, in the Open


University textbook _Evolution_ (Skelton, 1993) — show populations climbing adaptive peaks. But it is precisely when there is more than one peak, implying strong interaction, that fitness


does maximize. Edwards shows that if the viabilities at the two loci are additive, viability does then maximize in this model. From an evolutionary biologists’ point of view, this is a


trivial and uninteresting result: the loci are essentially independent. The existence of two adaptive peaks would imply strong interaction between the loci: alleles at one locus must


determine the viabilities of alleles at the other. However, in no case have I been able to construct a diagram like that in Skelton (1993) with two _internal_ peaks: if two peaks exist, they


are always at the corners of the two-dimensional diagram of gene frequencies. I conjecture there is never more than one internal peak. Formal proof that populations do climb adaptive peaks


has never, at least so far, dissuaded evolutionary biologists from taking the ascent for granted. Refutation of this seductive but erroneous metaphor of the evolutionary process could


usefully have been given a far greater emphasis in Edwards’ book. Edwards’ final chapter contains a brief proof of Fisher’s Fundamental Theorem, based on his much longer discussion in


_Biological Reviews_ (Edwards, 1994). As it is now understood, the theorem concerns a partial change in fitness — the change in ‘the breeding value in fitness’. This is the change in that


component in fitness which each allele carries to the next generation, not the total change in mean fitness. In this restricted sense, the theorem is exact. Although Hardy–Weinberg


frequencies are not assumed, the proof does depend on allelic frequencies being passed unchanged through the mating system to the next generation. This would only be true if matings between


genotypes do not vary in fertility, for example in random mating. It could also hold for some very restrictive cases of assortative mating in which matings are strictly monogamous and equal


in fertility. But whenever matings are polygynous or vary in fertility the change in gene frequency due to natural selection will then be changed again by sexual selection. If so, the proof


of the Fundamental Theorem fails. Edwards gives a simple and clear proof of the theorem and what it asserts. Anybody — that is to say almost everybody – who has been baffled by Fisher’s


chapter on the Fundamental Theorem in _The Genetical Theory of Selection_ should now be able to understand what Fisher was trying to say. REFERENCES * Edwards, A. W. F. (1994). The


fundamental theorem of natural selection. _Biol Rev_, 69: 443–474. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Moran, P. A. P. (1964). On the nonexistence of adaptive topographies. _Ann Hum Genet Lond_,


27: 383–393. Article  CAS  Google Scholar  * Skelton, P. W. (1993). _Evolution_. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham. Google Scholar  Download references AUTHOR INFORMATION AUTHORS AND AFFILIATIONS *


Emmanuel College, Cambridge, CB2 3AP, UK Peter O’donald Authors * Peter O’donald View author publications You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS


Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE O’donald, P. Foundations of Mathematical Genetics (2nd edn).. _Heredity_ 84, 620–621 (2000).


https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.0724c.x Download citation * Published: 01 May 2000 * Issue Date: 01 May 2000 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.0724c.x SHARE THIS


ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard


Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative


Trending News

Three Seasons In, And Just Like That Is Finally Its Own Gloriously Preposterous Thing

Carrie Bradshaw never stops starting over. After the original Sex and the City series ended with Sarah Jessica Parker’s ...

What to know about the new covid-19 variant nb. 1. 8. 1

Public-health experts have warned for months that the COVID-19 virus isn’t gone—and, far from waning, SARS-CoV-2 has mut...

Audra mcdonald is our greatest living stage actor

If you happen to take your eyes off the stage during the first few minutes of _Gypsy_ on Broadway, and turn instead to t...

Who are todd and julie chrisley, whom trump is pardoning?

President Donald Trump announced Tuesday that he would be pardoning reality TV stars Todd and Julie Chrisley, a couple b...

8 polite ways to decline a party invitation

When you get invited to a wedding or a party, “yes” might feel like the only socially acceptable response. If your RSVP ...

Latests News

Foundations of mathematical genetics (2nd edn).

Foundations of Mathematical Genetics (2nd edn). Anthony W. F. Edwards. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2000. Pp. ...

Generating destination brand awareness and image through the firm's social media

Pragmatically, the findings of this study urge policymakers of tourism companies, managers and destination marketers to ...

6. Epigenomic changes in human disease and during cancer progression

Epigenome profiling reveals multi-tissue regulatory dynamics associated with progression of cancer, Alzheimer’s disease ...

Page Not Found

Page Not Found The content that you're looking for is unavailable. You might find what you are looking for by using the ...

Chairman for NERC | Nature

Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution ...

Top