Us–china climate deal raises hopes for lima talks

But challenges remain for United Nations meeting in run-up to a new 2015 emissions treaty. US President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping celebrate their joint commitment to

limit carbon emissions, on 12 November. Credit: Greg Baker/Pool/AP A sudden climate truce between China and the United States has renewed hopes that a two-decade stand-off between developed

and developing nations over addressing climate change may at last be coming to an end. The first test will come as international negotiations resume on 1 December at the conference of the

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Lima. Negotiators expect to lay the groundwork there for next year’s summit in Paris, where countries are scheduled to sign

a treaty that would probably take effect after 2020. In the deal with China, US President Barack Obama committed the United States to reducing its emissions to 26–28% below 2005 levels by

2025. Chinese President Xi Jinping pledged that his country’s emissions would peak around 2030, although he did not specify an exact level (see ‘Carbon budget’). Credit: Source: UNEP “It’s

hard to imagine a more important signal to get the ball rolling,” says Elliot Diringer, executive vice-president of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, a think tank in Arlington,

Virginia. Much of the focus in Lima will be on how to translate a patchwork of emissions-reduction pledges such as the US–China deal into a fully fledged international agreement. The 2009

Copenhagen Accord brought developed and developing countries under one umbrella for the first time, but critics say that it resulted in little more than a list of promises. The question

heading into the Paris summit is how to lock those national pledges into a more robust framework that includes formal procedures for verifying that countries meet their commitments,

intervening when they do not and then revisiting the pledges to ratchet down emissions over time. Saleemul Huq, director of the International Centre for Climate Change and Development in

Dhaka, says that the US–China agreement marks a shift in climate negotiations. Battles may arise over the ultimate treaty’s structure, further emissions reductions and financial aid promised

by developed nations. But most countries, rich and poor alike, are now aligned and committed to addressing climate change. “I think momentum is the key, rather than an agreement that solves

everything on paper,” Huq says. He maintains that the political challenge is quite simple: move investments away from fossil fuels and into clean energy. “If we can make that switch,” he

says, “then we have more or less won the game.” Nations have committed to limiting the global average temperature increase to 2 °C above pre-industrial levels, but so far there is little

evidence that their governments will follow through. Scientists have calculated an overall limit on how much more carbon dioxide can be emitted to stay within that range — about a trillion

tonnes — and mapped out a range of emissions-reduction pathways that are required to keep within that budget. On the basis of commitments in place before the US–China deal, the UN

Environment Programme projects that emissions will exceed the level consistent with the 2 °C mark by 40% in 2030. The US–China deal will not close this gap, but it is nonetheless a step in

the right direction, says Bill Hare, managing director of Climate Analytics, a think tank in Berlin that analyses national climate policies. “They are definitely within shouting distance of

the 2 °C pathway,” he says, “and it’s going to put pressure on many others to enter the game.” The European Union has already said that it will reduce its emissions to 40% below 1990 levels

by 2030, and further pledges are expected in the first quarter of 2015. Whereas the 1997 Kyoto Protocol bound only developed countries and covered around 40% of global emissions, experts

expect that the current round of commitments, scheduled to be submitted to the UNFCCC by March, includes all major countries and is likely to cover up to 80% of global emissions. “It’s a

completely different ball game,” says Valli Moosa, a former environment minister for South Africa and current chairman of the conservation organization WWF South Africa. He is currently

co-chairing an independent dialogue involving climate officials from more than 20 leading countries at the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions — and on the basis of those discussions, he

thinks that the road to Paris looks promising. “Everything is aligned for success,” he says. “Having said that, it’s anybody’s guess.” Nature makes all articles free to view Investigations

launched into artificial tracheas Bullet-proof armour and hydrogen sieve add to graphene’s promise CHANGE HISTORY * _ 04 DECEMBER 2014 The _y_-axis on the graphic in this story was

originally out by a factor 10. The true scale is 0–35 gigatonnes not 0–3.5 Gt. The graph has now been corrected. _ Authors * Jeff Tollefson View author publications You can also search for

this author inPubMed Google Scholar RELATED LINKS RELATED LINKS RELATED LINKS IN NATURE RESEARCH What does the US–China climate deal mean? 2014-Nov-12 EU leaders hammer out landmark climate

deal 2014-Oct-24 UN climate summit scores high on passion 2014-Sep-25 Durban maps path to climate treaty 2011-Dec-13 World looks ahead post-Copenhagen 2009-Dec-22 _Nature_ Special: IPCC

_Nature_ Special: After Kyoto RELATED EXTERNAL LINKS IPCC UNFCCC negotiations in Lima Climate Action Tracker RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS

ARTICLE Tollefson, J. US–China climate deal raises hopes for Lima talks. _Nature_ 515, 473–474 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/515473a Download citation * Published: 26 November 2014 * Issue

Date: 27 November 2014 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/515473a SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a

shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative