Dust regulations trigger backlash

US agency’s reassessment of silica exposure rules provokes conflict-of-interest row with senators. Access through your institution Buy or subscribe This is a preview of subscription content,

access via your institution ACCESS OPTIONS Access through your institution Subscribe to this journal Receive 51 print issues and online access $199.00 per year only $3.90 per issue Learn

more Buy this article * Purchase on SpringerLink * Instant access to full article PDF Buy now Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout ADDITIONAL ACCESS

OPTIONS: * Log in * Learn about institutional subscriptions * Read our FAQs * Contact customer support Authors * Daniel Cressey View author publications You can also search for this author

inPubMed Google Scholar ADDITIONAL INFORMATION See Editorial page 8 RELATED LINKS RELATED LINKS RELATED LINKS IN NATURE RESEARCH Editor’s move sparks backlash 2012-Feb-21 NIH finalizes

conflict-of-interest rules 2011-Aug-23 Conflict disclosure plan dropped 2011-Aug-01 RELATED EXTERNAL LINKS OSHA rule on crystalline silica RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS Reprints and permissions

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE CITE THIS ARTICLE Cressey, D. Dust regulations trigger backlash. _Nature_ 507, 18 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/507018a Download citation * Published: 04 March 2014 *

Issue Date: 06 March 2014 * DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/507018a SHARE THIS ARTICLE Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Sorry, a

shareable link is not currently available for this article. Copy to clipboard Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative