Another nail in the coffin for the gitmo tribunals

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free _Mother Jones Daily_. More evidence has emerged that the military tribunals set up by the

Pentagon to review the legal status of Guantanamo detainees are nothing more than kangaroo courts. Last week, federal public defenders in Oregon filed an affidavit describing an interview

with an army reserve officer who has sat on 49 Combatant Status Review Tribunals (CSRT). The officer, a prosecutor in his civilian life, is the second to speak out publicly against the

tribunals. According to the affidavit, in at least six cases where the CSRT unanimously found the detainee did not qualify as an enemy combatant, the military ordered a new CSRT or forced

the first one to re-open the case. The findings were then reversed with no new evidence, according to the officer, whose name was withheld. Tribunal members were poorly trained, pressured by

higher-ups to rule against the detainnes, and despite congressional rules requiring the military to allow detainees to present evidence in their favor, the only witnesses allowed to testify

on their behalf were other Gitmo prisoners. (Surely those Uighurs were a big help!) The lawyers filed the affidavit in the case of Adel Hassan Hamad, a Sudanese father of four who worked at

a charity hospital in Pakistan, where he was captured and sent to Cuba in 2002. The military actually ruled that he could be released a few years ago, but he is still languishing in

captivity. It’s this kind of stuff that makes it hard to imagine that the Supreme Court, conservative as it is, will rule that the tribunals are a perfect substitute for real constitutional

rights.