What's so 'sweeping' about background checks and banning assault weapons? - Los Angeles Times

Assault rifles hang on the wall for sale at Blue Ridge Arsenal in Chantilly, Va., on Oct. 6. (Jim Watson / AFP/Getty Images) Nov. 11, 2017 5 AM PT Share via Close extra sharing options Email

Facebook X LinkedIn Threads Reddit WhatsApp Copy Link URL Copied! Print

To the editor: Jonah Goldberg says that people asking for sweeping new gun control measures mock people who offer thoughts and prayers to gun violence victims. (“Why there’s no action on

guns,” Opinion, Nov. 6)

No, we don’t mock those who pray. We mock those who do nothing to stop the gun violence in our country. We in the gun control advocacy groups ask for gun safety laws, enforcing existing

laws, outlawing weapons of war and requiring everyone who buys a gun to pass a background check and have their firearm registered.

Really, I do more to get a driver license in California than I would have to do to purchase a gun in most parts of our country.

Sheila Goldberg, Venice

The writer is a board member of Women Against Gun Violence.

..

To the editor: Goldberg ignores basic truths about guns, which I have shot since about the age of 9.

He writes, “Nor would banning assault weapons, however defined, put much of a dent in the problem.” It is simply common gun sense that the numbers of people killed in mass murders would be

lower if shooters did not have semi-automatic rifles with clips that provide up to 90 rounds or more of quick murderous firepower.

Tell the families of victims that we do nothing because we don’t want to put just a little “dent” in the problem. Any lives saved by the common-sense ban on assault weapons and their

enabling clips would be worth the great “sacrifice” the affected gun owners would have to make in the name of public safety.

Peter Zschiesche, San Diego

..

To the editor: Goldberg asserts that those of us who want “sweeping” gun control measures are really just elitists who can’t get their facts straight. His judgments are, literally, elitist

themselves.

Gun control measures would be complex to enact, obviously. Instead of giving facts on a particular aspect of the issue and opining on a path forward, Goldberg sits back and throws a bunch of

gasoline on the fire.

This is lazy journalism.

Christina Hosmer, Laguna Niguel

Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion and Facebook

More to Read Voices There’s a new reason your neighbors bought a weapon — gun culture 3.0 Oct. 27, 2024 Voices Abcarian: The surgeon general acknowledged America’s gun violence emergency.

Here’s why that matters July 3, 2024 Voices Hiltzik: How a surgeon general’s warning and a Supreme Court ruling may place gun control on the front burner June 27, 2024