Just 1 little neutron can make a world of difference

Latimes

Just 1 little neutron can make a world of difference"


Play all audios:

Loading...

Little things mean a lot--and not only when it comes to romance. The natural world is replete with small differences that have enormous effects. A difference in temperature of one degree


causes a road to freeze over in the rain, sending cars into skids. The difference of one electron changes a sedate, unreactive gas (neon) to a highly reactive metal (sodium). In the animate


world, an almost imperceptible change in intonation tells you someone is angry. The genetic difference between humans and African great apes is less than 1%. Small differences in animal


traits (a stronger beak, a longer neck) evolve over time into entirely different species. Indeed, according to writer Annie Dillard, the difference between plants and animals is not as great


as you might suspect: The lifeblood of green plants is the molecule chlorophyll, made up of 136 atoms of hydrogen, carbon, oxygen and nitrogen arranged in a ring around a single atom of


magnesium; the lifeblood of people is hemoglobin (blood), made up of 136 atoms of hydrogen, carbon, oxygen and nitrogen arranged in a ring around a single atom of iron. The big effects of


small differences came into clear view last year during the controversy over the launch of NASA’s Cassini spacecraft to the ringed planet Saturn. To keep its electronics warm and running in


the cold outer reaches of space, Cassini carried 72 pounds of radioactive plutonium. Plutonium is scary stuff: It fuels nuclear bombs. Protesters insisted that 5 billion people could suffer


radiation effects if Cassini crashed into Earth during its planned fly-by in 1999. The debate over Cassini’s safety was confusing in part because the kind of plutonium carried on Cassini


isn’t any good for making bombs, but it is 250 times more radioactive than bomb-grade plutonium. The same element--but with a very different character. What’s the difference? One lousy


little neutron in the atom’s nucleus. Plutonium 239--used for bombs--splits easily, setting off chain reactions. Plutonium 238--used to power spacecraft--does not split easily, but spits out


radiation at an enormous rate; if it lodges in someone’s lungs, it can be a death sentence. The mystery is: Neutrons are unimaginably small. They have no electric charge. How can they make


such a big difference? According to Caltech nuclear physicist Steven Koonin, a plutonium nucleus is a lot like a drop of water. Normally, the surface tension of water molecules around the


edge of the drop creates a kind of skin that keeps the droplet intact. But opposing forces--say, the friction of a car window tearing the drop in two--can break the skin and cause the drop


to fall apart. “That’s a pretty good description for what goes on in the nucleus [of plutonium],” said Koonin. That one extra neutron can change the shape of the nucleus from a spherical


drop into a dumbbell shape. And dumbbells are much easier to split than spheres. The extra neutron, in other words, can be the tipping point. Physicists aren’t surprised when small


differences make big differences. After all, they’re here in the first place because of an extremely small difference that no one quite understands. When matter first came into being after


the birth of the universe in the Big Bang, it was created in two opposite varieties: matter and antimatter. When matter and antimatter meet, they annihilate each other in a burst of pure


energy. * So if the universe began with equal parts of both, why are we here? Why is anything here? The answer is that there must have been an infinitesimally small imbalance in the creation


equation. Matter must have, so very slightly, outweighed antimatter. So when the matter and antimatter particles annihilated, a small excess remained. That excess is us. Nobody knows quite


how the imbalance popped up in the first place. Just as startling, cosmologists have calculated that a universe with a slightly greater amount of matter and energy would have collapsed on


itself almost as soon as it formed. A universe with slightly less energy would have expanded into a diffuse cloud, with no atoms, stars or planets. In the end, the romantics are right.


There’s a good reason to make much ado about very little. MORE TO READ


Trending News

Control of optical spin hall shift in phase-discontinuity metasurface by weak value measurement post-selection

ABSTRACT Spin Hall effect of light is a spin-dependent transverse shift of optical beam propagating along a curved traje...

The ties that bind | Nature

Access through your institution Buy or subscribe In most higher plants, symbiotic fungi are central to the process of nu...

valdez - Canal Supporters PSG 24-7

mercredi, septembre 25 2024 Breaking News Communauté CS – Le forum de nuit Sakina Karchaoui et Fabrice Abriel croient en...

Increased total and resting energy expenditure in children with cystic fibrosis

ABSTRACT 2078 _Pulmonary: Cystic Fibrosis Poster Symposium, Tuesday, 5/4_ Reduced growth is common in children with cyst...

India, russia to develop missiles having speed of 6,000kph

An agreement for their joint development will be signed with Russia during the visit of President Dmitry Medvedev to New...

Latests News

Just 1 little neutron can make a world of difference

Little things mean a lot--and not only when it comes to romance. The natural world is replete with small differences tha...

The nsa: four decades of lying - fitsnews

Remember the _U.S.S. Maddox_? The ship – an Allen M. Sumner-class destroyer – was laid down on October 28, 1943 and comm...

Surprise: L.A. Schools Win - Los Angeles Times

Amateur hour is over in the department charged with snagging state construction funds for the Los Angeles Unified School...

Gondia plane crash: aircraft reported wrong positions to air traffic control, followed wrong path

The same was revealed in the investigation report into April 2017 plane crash that killed two crew members on board incl...

7 state park lodges to consider across the u. S.

America’s famous national park lodges get lots of love, and rightly so, but sometimes travelers don’t realize there are ...

Top