Public benefit reporting by charities: analysis of findings

* Research and analysis PUBLIC BENEFIT REPORTING BY CHARITIES: ANALYSIS OF FINDINGS Published 1 June 2011 APPLIES TO ENGLAND AND WALES CONTENTS * Public benefit reporting by charities:

analysis of findings Print this page © Crown copyright 2011 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this

licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email:

[email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is

available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-benefit-reporting-by-charities-rs25/public-benefit-reporting-by-charities-analysis-of-findings PUBLIC BENEFIT REPORTING BY

CHARITIES: ANALYSIS OF FINDINGS THE CHARITY COMMISSION COMMISSIONED SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY (SHU) TO DELIVER A RESEARCH PROJECT INTO THE PUBLIC BENEFIT REPORTING (PBR) REQUIREMENT. THIS

REQUIREMENT WAS INTRODUCED IN APRIL 2008. THE PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT WAS TO ASSESS HOW WELL CHARITIES ARE GETTING TO GRIPS WITH REPORTING ON PUBLIC BENEFIT IN THEIR TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL REPORT

(TAR). The Commission’s initial analysis of the research findings is set out below: OVERALL, CHARITY TRUSTEES HAVE MADE GOOD PROGRESS WITH PUBLIC BENEFIT REPORTING SHU assessed 1,400 Trustee

Annual Reports from a sample of registered charities for which accounts were available for a financial year since the PBR requirement took effect. They counted up how many TARs included a

statement that the trustees had ‘had regard’ to the Charity Commission’s guidance on public benefit (a legal requirement). They also scored the TARs on how successfully they met the PBR

requirement overall. Of charities with incomes over £500K: * 72% of charities included a statement that they had had regard to the public benefit guidance * only 6% contained no discussion

of public benefit; the remaining 94% made at least some mention of public benefit and either partly or fully addressed the reporting requirement * 26% were awarded the highest scores of four

or five, out of a maximum of five. This meant the TAR fully and clearly met the requirement, with no ambiguity whatsoever. The Commission is pleased to see that many charities have adapted

quickly to the PBR requirement and that they appear to be drawing on the Commission’s regulatory guidance in order to provide a full and clear account of their work in the TAR. THERE IS ROOM

FOR IMPROVEMENT Public benefit reporting is still relatively new to many charities, who are still on a learning curve. Unsurprisingly, smaller charities have not addressed the reporting

requirement quite as comprehensively as larger charities. The Commission recognises that whilst larger charities have adapted well to the requirement, smaller ones may need additional time

and support to comply fully with the reporting regulations. Helpfully, the SHU report draws out some solid examples of PBR. The Commission hopes that the genuine TAR extracts included in the

report will be helpful for other charities. These examples can be used in addition to the Commission’s Example Trustees’ Annual Reports and Accounts. Trustees are also encouraged to visit

the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales’ (ICAEW) Charities Online Financial Reporting Awards, which showcase best practice in annual financial reporting. CHARITIES ARE

GOOD AT EXPLAINING THE ‘WHAT’ AND THE ‘WHO’ Put simply, public benefit reporting is about explaining: * what a charity’s aims are and what it has done to carry them out * who it seeks to

benefit * how people have benefited. According to SHU’s findings, one of the charity trustees’ strengths has generally been to give a clear account of their charity’s aims and an explanation

of who benefits from the charity’s work. The Commission welcomes this. Focussing on TARs from charities with incomes in excess of £500,000 we can see that: * 89% had included a clear

statement of their charitable aims * 74% had explicitly identified, and a further 13% had given a ‘strong indication’ of, who the charity seeks to benefit CHARITIES ARE NOT SO GOOD AT

DESCRIBING THE ‘HOW’ Given that PBR places a renewed emphasis on explaining who benefits from a charity’s activities and how, it is disappointing that charities were not so good at

explaining what they actually did to further their aims, and in particular how their beneficiaries benefited from this. For example, of all the TARs assessed from charities with incomes in

excess of £500,000, only 36% gave a clear explanation of how the intended beneficiaries had benefited from the charity’s work. These research findings serve as a reminder to trustees that it

is important not to neglect the ‘nuts and bolts’ of their charity’s work when it comes to describing what goods or services the organisation delivers, and how people benefit from these.

This is largely what public benefit reporting is all about. PUBLIC BENEFIT REPORTING IS GENERALLY NOT DIFFICULT OR TIME CONSUMING A common feeling amongst trustees in the focus groups and

interviews was a genuine enthusiasm to articulate how their charity made a positive contribution to the lives of beneficiaries and to the wider community. To these trustees, the public

benefit reporting requirement did not pose any new or unexpected challenges. The Commission is encouraged to learn that PBR is not particularly burdensome. In fact some charity trustees

considered the reporting process a valuable exercise, helping them to re-focus on their core aims. CHARITY TRUSTEES SHOULD TAKE OWNERSHIP OF PUBLIC BENEFIT REPORTING Some trustees involved

in the research had not familiarised themselves with the Charity Commission’s guidance. Instead they had relied on others, such as a member of staff or an external accountant, to deal with

the reporting requirement on their behalf. Charity trustees face many demands and pressures, of which the public benefit reporting requirement is just one. However, PBR is about explaining

why the charity exists, what it aims to achieve and how it works towards those aims. It is therefore crucial that trustees take this requirement seriously. The Commission will continue to

work with partners to raise awareness amongst the wider charitable sector of the reporting requirements and the range of guidance and support already available. THE TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL REPORT

IS IMPORTANT The Commission is concerned that the research has highlighted some confusion about the overall purpose of the TAR, as well as some non-compliance with the regulations. The TAR

is not only a statutory requirement but also a unique opportunity to demonstrate full accountability and transparency to supporters and the public. The TAR is also an opportunity for

charities to ‘tell their story well’. As most charities will already know, funding bodies in all sectors take great interest in the impact of charities’ work. Evidence of this often needs to

be provided in application forms and tender bids. A clear, concise annual report will make this job easier for charities and their trustees. Back to top