LAC vs IB: Why India's assessment of the length of border along China is misleading

HomeVideo ShowsVantageFirstpost AmericaFirstpost AfricaFirst SportsFast and FactualBetween The LinesFlashbackWorldExplainersNewsIndiaOpinionCricketTechEntertainmentSportsHealthUS Elections

2024Apple IncorporatedModi jiJustin TrudeauTrendingEventsUS Elections 2024Paris Olympics 2024Lok Sabha Elections 2024UK ElectionsIPL 2024Firstpost Defence

SummitSectionsHomeVideosShowsWorldIndiaExplainersOpinionSportsCricketHealthTech/AutoEntertainmentWeb StoriesBusinessShowsVantageFirst SportsFast and FactualBetween The

LinesFlashbackFirstpost AmericaLAC vs IB: Why India's assessment of the length of border along China is misleadingWhatsappFacebookTwitterWhatsappFacebookTwitterApple IncorporatedModi

jiJustin TrudeauTrendingEventsUS Elections 2024Paris Olympics 2024Lok Sabha Elections 2024UK ElectionsIPL 2024Firstpost Defence

SummitSectionsHomeVideosShowsWorldIndiaExplainersOpinionSportsCricketHealthTech/AutoEntertainmentWeb StoriesBusinessShowsVantageFirst SportsFast and FactualBetween The

LinesFlashbackFirstpost AmericaHomeOpinionLAC vs IB: Why India's assessment of the length of border along China is misleadingLAC vs IB: Why India's assessment of the length of border along

China is misleadingClaude Arpi• February 15, 2023, 16:08:30 ISTWhatsappFacebookTwitterThe length given by India’s Ministry of Home Affairs (3,488 km) is unfortunately wrongread

moreAdvertisement

What is the length of India’s border with China? You may think that it is easy to answer this question, but unfortunately, it is not. The Ministry of Home Affairsstates: “India has 15,106.7

Km of land border and a coastline of 7,516.6 Km including island territories.” It then gives the length of India’s land borders with neighbouring countries; Bangladesh has the longest border

(4,096 km), then China (3,488 km) and Pakistan (3,323 km). Unfortunately, it is wrong. India’s International Border (IB) with China is 4,056 km. Let me explain why. The length given by the

MHA (3,488 km) is the length of the Line of Actual Control (LAC), not the IB. The concept of LAC was introduced by the Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, during a press conference in Delhi in April

1960 (he had earlier vaguely mentioned it at the end of 1959 in a letter to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru). Zhou proposed six points to solve the border issue; the first two points

were:

administrative jurisdiction.

The fact that the Indian government then rejected the Premier’s proposal is irrelevant to the present argument. Zhou had come to Delhi to set up talks with India on the boundary dispute.

Subsequently, the officials of India and China met for several months during which Delhi made its position clear: “The India-China boundary starts from the tri-junction of the boundaries of

India, China and Afghanistan and runs eastward through the Kilik Pass, Mintaka Pass, Kharchanai Pass, Parpik Pass, and the Khunjerab Pass. These passes lie on the watershed between the Hunza

river flowing into the Indus system in India and the Qara Chukar river flowing into the Yarkand system in Sinkiang. From the Khunjerab Pass the boundary lies along a spur down to the

north-western bend of the Shaksgam or Muztagh river which it crosses at that point and ascends the crest line of the Aghil mountains. It then runs along the crest of the Aghil watershed

through the Aghil Pass the Marpo Pass and the Shaksgam Pass to the Karakoram Pass.” The coordinates for each of these places were given. Historically, there is no doubt that Gilgit-Baltistan

(GB) was part of the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir’s territory and that the IB presently starts at the trijunction with Afghanistan while the LAC begins at the Karakoram Pass. Rajnath

Singh’s declaration On 28 October, 2022, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, while addressing a function in Srinagar to mark 75th year of induction of the Indian Army in Kashmir, reiterated that

GB was part of India, though presently under occupation. “India’s development march towards the North will be complete after reaching GB,” he stated. The minister also referred to the 1994

Resolution passed in the Indian Parliament to recover the territories under illegal occupation of the ‘neighbouring country’. “We have only started our northward journey. Our journey will be

complete when we fully implement the unanimous resolution passed by the Parliament on February 22, 1994, and we reach our remaining areas like GB,” said Singh. A little bit of history In

1935, the viceroy prevailed upon Maharaja Hari Singh of Kashmir, ‘in the interests of the security of the British empire’ to lease the Gilgit Agency as well as the hill-states Hunza, Nagar,

Yasin and Ishkoman for 60 years to the British. Thereafter, Gilgit was administered by the Political Department, with a Political Officer reporting to the viceroy. The British Paramountcy

lapsed on 1 August, 1947, and Gilgit reverted to the Maharaja’s control. Lt Col Roger Bacon, the British Political Agent, handed his charge to Brig Ghansara Singh, the new governor appointed

by the Maharaja. A British officer, Maj Brown remained in-charge of the Gilgit Scouts. On 26 October 1947, after the brutal tribal invasion of Jammu and Kashmir organised by Pakistan,

Maharaja Hari Singh signed an Instrument of Accession and joined the Union of India. However, Maj Brown refused to acknowledge the orders of the Maharaja, under the pretext tha

t some leaders of the Frontier Districts Province (in GB) wanted to join Pakistan. He took it upon himself to hand over the entire area to Pakistan on 1 November, 1947. An interesting

announcement was published in the 1948 London Gazette which mentioned that the King “has been graciously pleased… to give orders for… appointments to the Most Exalted Order of the British

Empire…” The list included “Brown, Major (acting) William Alexander, Special List (ex-Indian Army).” Why awarding Brown? Simply because Brown had just ‘offered’ to Pakistan this

strategically important area for London. A British Article In 2017, an IANS article, When the British poured scorn over Gilgit, explained the background of the 1947 rebellion in Gilgit: “A

carefully chosen force capable of rapid movement in the mountainous territory controlled by British officers, the Gilgit Scouts, provided the muscle to the administration.” The article

continued: “The bloodless coup d’etat was planned by Brown to the last detail under the code name ‘Datta Khel’, which was also joined by a rebellious section of the J&K 6th Infantry under

Mirza Hassan Khan.” In his memoirs, Gilgit Rebellion: The Major who Mutinied over the Partition of India, Brown described his encounter with Pakistan prime minister Liaquat Ali Khan in

November 1947: “Colonel Bacon, Colonel Iskander Mirza, and I were called into the ante-room. The Pakistan Premier was seated at a desk, poring over a large-scale map of Kashmir and Central

Asia. …Mr Liaquat Ali Khan started by congratulating me and thanking me for all I had done in preserving peace in the Gilgit Agency.” Liaquat then said: “Brown, give me your ideas [for

Gilgit] from a military point of view.” The major explained in detail his plans to defend the area by reorganising the Scouts. “Right” said the Premier: “That disposes of the military

angle.” Though there is no doubt about the illegality of the mutiny, one paramount question remains: was the British Headquarters informed? At the time, the entire Pakistani Army hierarchy

was British. So, the answer can only be that Maj Brown’s British bosses were aware of his ‘gift’ to Pakistan. The fact that he was nominated to the OBE is further proof. The King usually

does not appoint ‘deserters’ or ‘rebels’ to the august Order. The length of the IB Even today, this has serious implications for India, though it does not change the length of the IB (4,056

km), beginning at the trijunction with Afghanistan in the West and ending at the trijunction with Burma (Myanmar) in the east. The report of the officials cited above gives the Indian

position in the East: “The boundary crosses the Yonggyap Pass and the Kangri Karpo Pass in this sector. It then crosses the Lohit river a few miles south of Rima and joins the tri-junction

of the India, Burma and China boundaries near the Diphu Pass.” The UN Resolutions The UN resolutions of 17 January, 1948, and 13 August, 1948, and 5 January, 1949, (UNCIP Resolutions) made

it clear that “P

akistan cannot claim to exercise sovereignty in respect of J&K.” In 1963, a secret note from the MEA clarified further that according to the term of the UN Resolutions, “Pakistan cannot

purport to exercise even ‘actual control’ over the defence of these areas.” Practically, it also means that the agreement signed on 2 March, 1963, between Pakistan and China about the

Shaksgam Valley of the Gilgit Agency being transferred to China is legally invalid. Another logical conclusion is that inhabitants of the area if they want to move to India, should be

entitled to Indian citizenship. A British Resolution Amazingly, in 2017, the British Parliament passed a resolution confirming GB was part of Jammu and Kashmir. The motion was tabled on 23

March, 2017, by Bob Blackman of the Conservative Party. It reads: “GB is a legal and constitutional part of the state of Jammu and Kashmir, India, which is illegally occupied by Pakistan

since 1947, and where people are denied their fundamental rights including the right of freedom of expression.” Two years later, the new maps released by the Government of India showing the

Leh district of Ladakh including the districts of Gilgit, Gilgit Wazarat, Chilhas and Tribal Territory of 1947, made this clear. Interestingly, the Indian media reported last month: “Amidst

news of flour and food crisis across Pakistan, the Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (PoK), GB is again making headlines as residents are furious over the discriminative policies of the Pakistan

government that has exploited the region for several decades and are now demanding a reunion with India in Ladakh”, noted India Today, adding: “Several videos on the internet show the extent

of the discontent among residents.” Let us hope that the correct length of India’s border with China will soon be obvious to all. The writer is a noted author, journalist, historian,

Tibetologist and China expert. The views expressed are personal. Read all the Latest News, Trending News, Cricket News, Bollywood News, India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on 

Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

TagsJammu and KashmirRajnath SinghJawaharlal NehruLACPakistan Occupied KashmirLine of Actual ControlIndia China TiesMaharaja Hari SinghInstrument of AccessionLiaquat Ali KhanLt Col Roger

BaconRead MoreFind us on YouTubeSubscribeRelated StoriesA tale of many resolutions: How Article 370 has become bone of contention in Jammu and Kashmir AssemblyWatch | Ruckus in J&K Assembly,

some MLAs marshalled out after clash over Article 370Opinion | Post-election turmoil in Jammu and Kashmir: Political histories and resurgence of terrorHow biscuits played a big role in

eliminating top Lashkar e-Taiba commander in KashmirA tale of many resolutions: How Article 370 has become bone of contention in Jammu and Kashmir AssemblyWatch | Ruckus in J&K Assembly,

some MLAs marshalled out after clash over Article 370Opinion | Post-election turmoil in Jammu and Kashmir: Political histories and resurgence of terrorHow biscuits played a big role in

eliminating top Lashkar e-Taiba commander in KashmirTop ShowsAbout FirstpostMost Searched CategoriesWeb StoriesWorldIndiaExplainersOpinionSportsCricketTech/AutoEntertainmentIPL 2024NETWORK18

SITESNews18Money ControlCNBC TV18Forbes IndiaSitemap is on YouTube

Subscribe Now Copyright @ 2024. Firstpost - All Rights Reserved

About UsContact UsPrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyTerms Of UseHomeVideoShortsNews