Explainer: how criminal courts and jury service work in france

Whether you admire or loathe him, Napoleon was responsible for swathes of French institutions, from lycées to departments – and the legal system is a prime example. Before the Revolution,

the various systems around the land reflected the slow unification of France. Church law was mixed with local customs and a system of Roman law based on statutory law in the south and

Germanic law based on royal decrees in the north. Local aristocrats and craft guilds also played a role. When the Revolution came, many leading revolutionaries, including Danton and

Robes­pierre, were lawyers, so it is not surprising that they saw creating a more unified system as important – but they failed. It took Napoleon to effect lasting change. His _Code civil

des français_ was completed in 1804 and covered civil law in great detail. He also produced codes for criminal law, established unified working rules for courts, and created administrative

law. Codes for commerce and for specialist areas such as insurance have been produced since, but are all based on the principles of the _Code civil_. READ MORE: DIFFERENCE BETWEEN

CONTRAVENTION, DÉLIT AND CRIME IN FRANCE THE INVESTIGATING JUDGE PLAYS A LARGE ROLE IN FRENCH JUSTICE Anyone who has read Georges Simenon’s _Maigret_ novels will know one of the big

differences between the Anglo-Saxon and French legal systems is the role of the _juge d’instruction_ (investigating judge), to whom Commissaire Maigret must constantly report. Such a judge

is involved in all very serious criminal cases – where someone is accused of _un crime_ (such as murder or rape) – but is optional in medium-severity crimes (_délits_) or low-level

_contraventions_. They are appointed by the_ local__ procureur_ (public prosecutor) to be in charge of investigations and can order the police or gendarmes to follow – or stop – a certain

line of inquiry. A key moment in any big case comes when the accused is questioned by the investigating judge. This is used by the public prosecutor to decide if the case will go to trial.

Statements made to the police are referred to by the investigating judge during this process, and can be used in court, but it is the judge’s report that carries the most weight. Judges can

also order meetings, in their offices, between the accused and witnesses, as well as reconstructions of crimes, to try to understand what happened. READ MORE: FREE HELP FOR CRIME VICTIMS IN

FRANCE INCLUDING FOREIGN NATIONALS DIFFERENT GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS OVERSEE POLICE AND JUDGES This system has inbuilt tensions – the police are under the interior minister, while judges and

prisons fall under the justice minister. In autumn 2023, a number of police officers got into trouble for saying that law and order problems in France lie not with the police but with the

judges. Similarly, the fact that judges belong to unions, including some extreme left-wing ones, has prompted questions about their impartiality. During Nicolas Sarkozy’s presidency, for

example, one union building was found to have a noticeboard labelled _mur des cons_ (wall of idiots) on which photos of various public figures – politicians, intellectuals or journalists,

mostly from the Right, senior judges and police unionists – were displayed, as well as photos of various victims’ parents. COURT SYSTEM VERY DIFFERENT TO UK French court procedures differ

significantly from, for example, English and Welsh ones. Broadly speaking, the latter are adversarial, with the prosecution and defence each presenting their version of what happened, and

the judge and jury, if there is one, sitting above the fray before deciding who to believe. By contrast, the French system is inquisitorial, based on the tradition of law inherited from the

Roman Catholic church. The idea is that the court, including defence, prosecution and judges, is there to find out the truth by inquiry. The best way of doing so is to have the accused

confess their crime and, if they do not, to question everything about the case to establish the facts of what happened. READ MORE: BRITON APPEALS CONVICTION FOR KILLING HIS WIFE IN

SOUTH-WEST FRANCE TRIAL JUDGE CHAIRS JURY DELIBERATIONS During proceedings, trial judges participate actively. They read out the investigating judge’s report and when witnesses and

defendants are called to the bar, they have to answer questions from the judge or judges as well as from their own lawyer and the prosecution. If there is a jury, its members retire with the

judge to decide their verdict. The judge assumes the role of chairperson and leads the deliberations. Where there is no confession from the accused, witnesses and experts are cross-examined

so the court can determine whether or not to believe them. WHY IS THE FRENCH SYSTEM SO SLOW? One problem with the system is how slow it is. A murder trial where the culprit is arrested with

a smoking gun standing over the victim and makes a full confession to the police and investigating judge will still take four years to conclude. Complex investigations take longer. Part of

the problem is that many lower courts were shut by Rachida Dati when she was justice minister in 2007-2009 as a cost-saving measure. In addition, court officers and judges are_

fonctionnaires_ and work only a 35-hour week with generous holidays. DIFFERENT COURTS HEAR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF CRIME The most serious cases are heard in a _cour d’assises_, the top-level

criminal court, of which there is one per department that sits four times a year. It is the only one using juries and, as of 2023, only hears appeals trials or cases with potential sentences

of at least 20 years. Below the _cour d’assises_, there is the_ cour criminelle_, in which a panel of five judges hears cases relating to crimes with a maximum punishment of 15-20 years.

The _tribunal correctionnel_ rules on_ délits_ and the_ tribunal de police_ deals wit_h__contraventions_, in most cases without any actual hearing being held. JURY SERVICE IN FRANCE Only

French citizens aged 23 and above can be jurors (exceptions include police officers and MPs) and they are chosen at random from electoral lists. They are notified by letter, including the

date and time of the start of the session they are to attend and rough expected length – about two weeks, during which a juror might hear around 10 cases. Jury service is obligatory unless

you show a serious reason, mainly health-related, why you cannot do it. Em­ployees are not paid during jury service but financial compensation is given. RELATED ARTICLES EXPLAINER: SPEED

CAMERAS, FINES AND DRIVING LICENCE POINTS IN FRANCE 13 THINGS FRENCH ‘COMMISSAIRES DE JUSTICE’ DO APART FROM COLLECT DEBTS WHY FRANCE’S JUSTICE MINISTER IS HIMSELF ON TRIAL