The full story - world bank of the future

Global Locations press release published by on October 17, 2000 _Source: Carnegie_ Full Text (PDF format) Street protesters in Prague in September 2000 are not the only ones complaining

about the World Bank. Conservative critics are pointing the finger too. On the left, champions of social justice argue that World Bank loan conditions hurt the poor. On the right,

conservatives claim lending practices crowd out private investment. Critics from all sides compound public confusion about globalization and the impact on people of global financial

institutions. Nancy Birdsall dissects the critics' positions and proposes World Bank reforms rarely put on the table: end "cookie-cutter pricing" or the outdated tradition of

a single interest rate and loan term no matter what; give countries like China and Brazil more voting power; and don't give up on much-maligned conditionality but fix and enforce it.

Birdsall notes that governance of international financial institutions will never be perfectly representative nor accountable, in part because of failures of democracy in borrowing

countries. But, conceiving of the World Bank as a club, she argues for balanced reform not shutdown. Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views

represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees. © 2024 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights

reserved.