Lost in the mail: how a comedy of errors cost the red sox carlton fisk and fred lynn in the 1980-81 offseason

Lost in the mail: How a comedy of errors cost the Red Sox Carlton Fisk and Fred Lynn in the 1980-81 offseason “We’ve suffered through things we said we’d never forgive them for,” a fan told

the _Boston Globe_ of Red Sox management while awaiting the decision. “But this time it’s different. This time it’s Fisk, and Fisk is one of us.” Whether anyone was ready for it or not, the

33-year-old was officially baseball’s latest free agent. Though he had unequivocally said, “I don’t want to leave the Red Sox,” as recently as January, Fisk already appeared to have moved

on. When asked later that day by WBZ’s Bob Lobel if he had spoken with the Boston management, he gave a blunt answer. Advertisement: “We told them they would be treated like every other

team,” said Fisk. That Fisk would leave was not yet a foregone conclusion. But even as Sullivan told reporters that “we want to re-sign him very badly,” he couldn’t help but add — in terms

that fans undoubtedly found ominous — “we want to keep some sanity here, and I won’t get caught in a slingshot.” Having stirred up reporters with his dramatic announcement, Sullivan bristled

at what came next. Timing, as recent events had shown, was not his strength. Yet just before he “engaged in a shouting match” with Lobel over the nature of their television interview, he

turned and delivered the only line with which Red Sox fans would’ve wholeheartedly concurred. “Open the damn bar,” he declared, inadvertently creating a soundbite Lobel would replay

frequently. When Fisk eventually signed with the White Sox a few weeks later in March on a five-year deal worth $2.9 million, New England’s nightmare was complete. [embedded content] But how

had it come to this? How had a player who had so perfectly symbolized the region — and who said that only a few months earlier he “never could have visualized” any scenario where he wasn’t

on the Red Sox — suddenly been allowed to become a free agent and leave? TWO DAYS LATE. The literal answer, unbelievable as it remains, was that a piece of mail had been sent two days late.

Advertisement: The Red Sox failed to send Fisk and then-teammate Fred Lynn (the 1975 Rookie of the Year and American League MVP) their contracts by the Dec. 20 deadline as established by

baseball’s Basic Agreement, as the contracts were instead mailed on Dec. 22. Fisk, as arbitrator Raymond Goetz declared on that fateful February day, would attain free agency, while Lynn had

been hastily traded to the Angels before the ruling in January. Still, the more definitive answer to the question lies in the relationship of Sullivan, who represented an older era of

baseball (freely admitting in 1981 that “I liked the days when everyone had a good time around baseball”) with the inexorable trend towards increased player power. The result was a

compounding series of unforced errors that the Red Sox endured in publicly humiliating fashion during the 1980-1981 offseason. The journey to that calamitous point began decades earlier. “IF

NUCLEAR WAR WERE TO BREAK OUT, IT WOULD ONLY MAKE PAGE TWO IN BOSTON.” Sullivan’s origin in baseball was an encapsulation of the older era he’d emerged from. The future Red Sox executive

only ended up in baseball because professional football lacked the financial resources to persuade him when he was a college athlete in the 1950s. As a highly touted recruit in both sports,

Sullivan (a Georgia native) chose the University of Florida, where he excelled as a quarterback and a catcher. Advertisement: “He could fire the baseball, he could hit, and he could flat

throw the football,” teammate Doug Dickey said of Sullivan. “He had a great arm. Haywood was a man among boys.” The Red Sox lured Sullivan out of college early with a $75,000 signing bonus,

but despite a promising start, injuries limited his playing career. Haywood Sullivan (right) during his time in the Red Sox minor league system. His journey from player to front office

member was swift. By 1964, he was a minor league manager. By 1966, he’d moved into the front office, as Red Sox director of player personnel. In 1976, after the death of former Red Sox owner

Tom Yawkey, the team was put up for sale. Along with Buddy LeRoux, a former Celtics and Bruins trainer, Sullivan helped spearhead a group bidding for the team. Though they were selected by

Yawkey’s widow, Jean, the sale ran into trouble when it was examined by Major League Baseball. Neither LeRoux nor Sullivan possessed the kind of wealth necessary to bankroll a team.

According to a _Sports Illustrated_ account, LeRoux and Sullivan personally pledged just $200,000 of the total $15 million bid (supported by 11 other partners). The ensuing investigation of

the bid drew enormous local coverage. “If nuclear war were to break out, it would only make page two in Boston,” Red Sox spokesperson Bill Crowley later told Peter Gammons. It was only after

Jean personally backed the bid herself that it gained enough financial legitimacy to be allowed. Sullivan became general manager of the team, in charge of baseball operations.

Advertisement: But even with Jean, Boston’s new ownership got underway with immediate questions about its capacity to sustain a major market team. “FOR THEM, IT WAS A TOTAL ‘NO-LOSE’

SITUATION.” Simultaneously, the landscape of baseball — stagnant for decades — was rapidly shifting. After almost a hundred years of having it all their way, owners had seen the power

balance begin to swing towards the player during the 1970s. Led by Curt Flood’s challenge of the “reserve clause” — which baseball owners had successfully employed since the 19th century as

a tool to keep players even after their contracts had expired — and Baseball Players Association president Marvin Miller’s efforts to collectively bargain, a path to free agency was opened

by 1976. Salaries and payrolls began to rise as players, a small number of whom were finally able to hit the open market each year, started drawing competitive interest from multiple teams

bidding for their services. Between 1970 and 1980, the average MLB salary rose from $29,303 to $143,676, its greatest proportional jump in the last 50 years. The Red Sox, far from being

spared this trend, were right in the middle of it. Seemingly just in time for the landmark Seitz Decision (when baseball arbitrator Peter Seitz essentially nullified the reserve clause at

the Major League level and opened the path to free agency), Boston produced a golden generation that catapulted them into the 1975 World Series. Led by Fisk, Lynn, Jim Rice, and a range of

other talented players, the Red Sox were one of the most exciting teams in baseball. Fisk, seemingly the embodiment of New England’s dream for a World Series, hit an iconic home run to win

Game 6 of the Series, willing it fair: Advertisement: [embedded content] Boston’s youthful team created a new level of excitement around Red Sox baseball. Yet their ability, as baseball

owners across the league were learning, would eventually have a corresponding impact on the team’s payroll. Jerry Kapstein, one of baseball’s early power agents, signed several of Boston’s

young stars. Fisk, Lynn, and shortstop Rick Burleson all became clients. And in an attempt to harness the negotiating leverage caused by the creation of free agency, Kapstein made a bold

play: He secured five-year contracts for Burleson, Fisk, Lynn with an option for a sixth year. The only problem was that, according to Miller, Kapstein had bargained away the players’ free

agent rights, making the sixth year (and additional years) binding. In his autobiography, “A Whole Different Ball Game,” Miller explained what Kapstein had done. “The catch was that they

also gave up their free agency right when the contracts expired,” said Miller. “Kapstein had given Boston ‘the right of first refusal.’” Miller later reasoned with the Boston players over

why they could not do that even if their ultimate intent — as Fisk maintained — was to remain with the Red Sox anyway. “There’s no argument,” Miller told them. “You can stay with Boston if

you choose, but you can’t give away the right to be a free agent and leave. It violates the Basic Agreement.” Quietly, Miller had the clause removed from the contracts. “I made it clear that

only the provisions that took away their rights would be eliminated, and the rest of the contract would remain unchanged,” he added. “For them, it was a total ‘no-lose’ situation.”

Advertisement: Miller’s elimination of Boston’s “right of first refusal” clause would have enormous implications. “THAT ACTUALLY GOT BE A FAIRLY BIG STORY JUST BECAUSE PEOPLE NEVER THOUGHT

THAT WOULD HAPPEN.” By the end of the 1980 season, any optimism that had permeated the start of Sullivan’s time as one of the team’s three “general partners” had long since evaporated. “The

excitement over 1975 was never repeated,” Gammons said in a recent interview. Since assuming control of the team in 1978, Sullivan had presided over one of the greatest second half collapses

by any Red Sox team ever, as the Yankees reeled in Boston’s seemingly insurmountable divisional lead down the stretch and went on to win the pennant after a devastating one-game playoff.

The following years produced underwhelming results (with two more non-playoff seasons). And as the end of 1980 approached, the looming crisis of multiple expiring contracts neared. Sullivan,

by not even attempting to renegotiate with Fisk, had made one of the team’s most loyal members feel disrespected. “His feelings were rapidly changing due to what he perceived as a lack of

interest and a lack of respect from the Red Sox,” wrote Fisk biographer Doug Wilson. “Will McDonough reported in the _Globe_ that Carlton had not forgotten the remark Sullivan made about his

elbow in the spring of 1979: ‘His contract may be bothering him more than his elbow.'” In an off-the-cuff conversation with Gammons at a Philadelphia cocktail party that October,

Sullivan matter-of-factly admitted he wasn’t going to be able to afford to keep all of Boston’s stars. “He told me, ‘Well, I think I’m going to have to trade them. And we’re certainly going

to find what we can get for them,’” Gammons recalled Sullivan saying. “That actually got be a fairly big story just because people never thought that would happen.” Advertisement: Still, the

assumption remained that Boston would have contractual control of the Burleson, Fisk, and Lynn contingent, believing (erroneously) that they continued to have a right of first refusal.

Burleson was dealt in early December to the Angels, in what Gammons acknowledged was a “good deal” for Boston. Even still, warning signs were flashing. Sullivan, an old-time baseball man,

ran an organization that was often under-staffed and disorganized. It showed after the Burleson deal, when another team’s public relations assistant had to handle the announcement because of

a miscommunication at the Winter Meetings. “Everything was weird that year. The Red Sox PR guys, Bill Crowley and Dick Bresciani, didn’t wait around and went out to dinner,” Gammons

recalled of the Burleson deal. “So when the Red Sox were trying to find them, they weren’t around. The Toronto PR guy actually handed out the announcement and ran the press conference. “It

was a really old school baseball franchise at that point,” said Gammons. “They had the same guys working there for a long time. And there’s a lot to be said for loyalty, but sometimes you do

need to change.” Burleson, one of the team’s leaders, was now gone. Fisk, weeks after the season had ended, had still heard nothing from Sullivan or anyone in Red Sox management, only

exacerbating his feeling of being disrespected. And Lynn, as had been known for weeks, was on the trading block. Sullivan and Boston’s front office, a product of an earlier baseball era, was

ill-equipped to grapple with the increasingly complex realities of player contracts. It would prove costly. “IT’S STUPIDITY OF THE HIGHEST ORDER.” The misconception at the heart of the

bizarre mailed contract disaster of late 1980 was that Sullivan and the Red Sox did not simply “forget” to send contracts to Fisk and Lynn by the Dec. 20 deadline. Advertisement: “He was

advised by the lawyers in the commissioner’s office that he didn’t have to send them out because [the Red Sox] had right of refusal,” said Gammons. “And the interpretation of the intention

was strongly upheld by the commissioner’s office.” It was an intentional choice, in other words. Then, as if wavering on his original stance, Sullivan mailed the contracts anyway on Dec. 22.

But the damage was done, as the right of first refusal clause had been removed years before. Miller, upon hearing that Boston had not sent either Fisk or Lynn their contracts by the

deadline set under the terms of the Basic Agreement, had the Players Association file for free agency for both of them. As news filtered our, criticism erupted, calling Sullivan’s

intelligence into question. “It might be the worst blunder in baseball history,” Boston Herald columnist Tim Horgan declared on Jan. 7. Suddenly, instead of getting one more year with Fisk

and Lynn, Boston was staring at the very real possibility of both walking immediately and for nothing in return. Just as the January arbitration hearing approached, the Red Sox sent Lynn to

the Angels. The return for one of the greatest outfielders in Boston history was not even close to his value: None of the three players acquired in return (Jim Dorsey, Joe Rudi, and Frank

Tanana) played in Boston for more than two seasons. Fisk, meanwhile, had gone through with the arbitration hearing. And again, Boston’s poor organizational structure left the team

dangerously exposed, especially to Miller’s sharply run Players Association. Advertisement: Having knocked the “right of refusal” clause out of the players’ contracts, Miller was confident

that the Red Sox had no legal authority to resist Fisk’s free agent claims. “The Red Sox were going on that it was the ‘spirit’ in which they got the deal,” Gammons explained. “Well, the

spirit doesn’t work. It’s the language, and that’s what happened.” It was in those circumstances that the memorable scene in the Fenway Park press room unfolded on Feb. 12, but only after

Goetz, the University of Kansas professor and baseball arbitrator, announced his ruling in a 21-page decision. Noting that the specifics of the case made him “powerless to deviate,” he sided

with the Players Association. Miller offered his own unsparing critique in the aftermath. “I don’t think it was a close case. As a matter of fact, there was absolutely no reason for there

to have been such a case,” Miller asserted. “If the club does not tender the proposed contract on time, the player is a free agent. Why waste the time, energy, and money of everyone

involved? It’s stupidity of the highest order.” “I just think he had bad advice,” Gammons said in more sympathetic reference to Sullivan. “I would hammer him on things, like the whole thing

with Fisk,” Gammons added, “and he would call the next morning and say, ‘You got me.’ And we would talk it out. As a journalist, you liked that.” Nonetheless, Sullivan’s ownership group had

managed to let the entire spine of the team — its catcher, shortstop, and center fielder — leave in the same offseason. It was an unmitigated disaster. Advertisement: “The Fisk episode was

the worst moment for Red Sox fans since the team sold Babe Ruth,” future baseball commissioner (and Massachusetts native) Bart Giamatti would say in 1986. Fisk would go on to play an

astounding 13 more seasons, retiring at the incredible age of 45 (entering the Hall of Fame in 2000). In his first game back at Fenway Park after leaving the Red Sox in 1981, he homered.

[embedded content] Still, despite the manner of his exit from Boston, Fisk entered Cooperstown wearing a Red Sox hat. As for Sullivan, who would sell his ownership stake in 1994 for more

than $32 million, his time as general manager marked the end of an era. It was the beginning of what fans recognize as modern player movement. And nothing symbolized that more than a local

hero’s departure, triggered by some tardy mail. HAYDEN BIRD Sports Staff Hayden Bird is a sports staff writer for Boston.com, where he has worked since 2016. He covers all things sports in

New England. GET BOSTON.COM'S BROWSER ALERTS: Enable breaking news notifications straight to your internet browser. Enable push notifications Great, you're signed up! An error

occurred. Please try again later. Close Modal BOSTON.COM NEWSLETTER SIGNUP BOSTON.COM LOGO Stay up to date with everything Boston. Receive the latest news and breaking updates, straight from

our newsroom to your inbox. No thanks - Closes Modal window