Dwp set to seize phones in raids on homes and never give them back

THE DWP COULD LAUNCH RAIDS ON PROPERTIES AND SEIZE SMARTPHONES WITH THE ITEMS NEVER BEING RETURNED. 06:28, 13 Mar 2025 The Department for Work and Pensions could seize people's phones

and NEVER give them back under new bank account powers. The DWP could launch raids on properties and seize smartphones with the items never being returned. Its part of the new Fraud Bill for

the DWP from the Labour Party government. DWP minister, Andrew Western, said: "This clause gives the DWP a clear legal path to seek court approval to dispose of property that has come

into its possession when executing a search warrant. In most cases, the seized items will be returned to their rightful owner as soon as they are no longer required by a criminal

investigation. However, as I alluded to in responding to the hon. Member for Torbay, there are certain circumstances in which this may be either not possible or not desirable. "An order

may be sought when a seized item does not belong to the suspect and where it is not possible to identify the rightful owner, where there is a high risk that returning the seized item means

it could be used for the furtherance of crime or where information needs to be deleted before the item is returned to prevent a further offence. READ MORE ELDERLY DRIVERS COULD FACE

'IN-HOUSE' TEST EVERY TWO YEARS UNDER NEW PLAN "This will prevent the risk of, for instance, returning a seized smartphone that contains data relating to hijacked or stolen

identities that may enable fraud and the distribution of information that could be used for criminal gain. With the increasing use of technology, it will be ever more critical to ensure this

does not happen. This clause allows the DWP to act in the same way as the police." Mr Western said: "To avoid the risk of incorrect disposal of seized items, applications for any

action of this kind must be made to, and must be approved by, a court. In addition, there are restrictions on how quickly seized material can be disposed of. In all cases, six months must

elapse from the approval of an application by a court before a seized item can be destroyed. Article continues below "Finally, any person with an interest in an item can make an

application to the court. This could be the DWP, the item’s rightful owner or the person from whom it was seized. The clause sets out specific criteria in relation to any challenges that may

be brought and the procedures that apply. If an order has been given for the item to be destroyed, the order cannot be revoked. However, the timeframe for the item to be destroyed may be

challenged. "This clause creates a legal and proportionate gateway for the DWP to deal with seized items appropriately. This ensures that the DWP can act in the same way as the police

when concluding fraud investigations." Rebecca Smith, Opposition Assistant Whip, replied: "Where DWP investigators seize items from a premises, they will generally be returned to

the owner if they are no longer needed for an ongoing investigation. "As we have heard, it may not be appropriate to return an item in certain cases, such as if the person from whom the

item was taken is not the actual owner or if the owner cannot be traced. In some cases, there may be a risk that a seized item could be used for a criminal purpose if it were returned. We

acknowledge that clause 80 gives the DWP a lawful basis for disposing of the items. "Clause 80 stipulates that items cannot be destroyed until six months have passed from when the

magistrate approved the application to destroy them. Why is six months the chosen timeframe, and what are the precedents for other evidence seized in criminal investigations? "We

support the provision allowing someone with an interest in the item to request the court to alter an approved action in relation to the item. We believe that is sensible. Can the Minister

give an example of the sort of scenario that might refer to, just for the benefit of the Committee? What will the timeframe be for such applications? Article continues below "Finally,

how will interested parties be made aware of items they may wish to take court action over? I assume it will not be a police lost property office, but ultimately it is one of those questions

of how someone will know that there is something in which they might have an interest."