Retirement plan notices: current experiences and opportunities for improvement
Retirement plan notices: current experiences and opportunities for improvement"
- Select a language for the TTS:
- UK English Female
- UK English Male
- US English Female
- US English Male
- Australian Female
- Australian Male
- Language selected: (auto detect) - EN
Play all audios:
Employer-sponsored retirement plans, including 401(k) plans, similar individual retirement savings plans, and traditional pension plans, are among the primary vehicles through which workers
in the U.S. save for retirement. People who participate in these retirement plans receive important notices or statements about their plans that show participants their account balance or
how well funded the plan is, communication about changes to the investments, year-end documents provided for tax purposes, and various other documents. In March 2024, we surveyed 595 adults
age 50 or over who have a retirement savings plan or pension from a current or former employer in order to learn what they think of their retirement plan notices, how they access them, what
plan information is most important to them, and how they think plan notices could be improved. We also asked some questions designed to examine understanding of plan fees and their impact on
retirement investments. MOST REPORT AT LEAST SOME UNDERSTANDING OF THEIR PLAN NOTICES, BUT MANY LACK BASIC KNOWLEDGE ABOUT FEES. Fewer than half (45%) of adults 50-plus who have
employer-sponsored retirement plans say that they completely understand the notices they receive from their plans, while nearly as many (43%) say they somewhat understand them. Another 12%
understand them just a little or not at all. Importantly, the survey reveals a lack of awareness of fees charged by plans, as well as a desire for more information about fees. All retirement
plans charge fees, such as fees for managing the plan as a whole and fees for managing the plan’s investments. In spite of this, when asked to describe their understanding of the fees that
they pay in their retirement plan, 40% of participants 50-plus in all types of retirement plans say that they don’t pay fees on their retirement plan, and another 16% say that they have
never thought about this. Just 27% say that they understand the fees and know where to find information about them. Fees are especially relevant to participants in 401(k)-type retirement
savings plans, as participants in these types of plans typically can choose from a selection of available investments and may switch to investments with lower fees if desired. However, while
all 401(k)-type plans charge plan participants fees, even among participants in 401(k)-type plans, roughly one in four (24%) think that they don’t pay fees in their retirement plan and
another 18% say that they have never thought about fees. Only one in three (34%) 401(k)-type plan participants 50-plus say that they understand their plan fees and know where to find
fee-related information. Furthermore, the survey suggests that many respondents are unable to make basic fee calculations that would enable them to assess the impact of these fees on their
retirement investments. When presented with an explanation of retirement plan fees for a hypothetical retirement plan, many respondents were unable to correctly calculate the total fees that
a participant in the hypothetical plan would pay. Specifically, in one exercise, just 54% of respondents correctly calculated the fees, while in another exercise just 64% of respondents
correctly calculated the fees. FEES CAN HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON ACCOUNT BALANCES. Plan participants’ lack of knowledge about fees may lead participants to choose plan investments that
they may not have chosen if they had better understood the potential long-term impact of these fees. For example, according to an investment fees calculator developed by The Pew Charitable
Trusts, a retirement saver who starts contributing $175 every two weeks to a retirement plan early in their career, with an average rate of return of 6% and annual fees of just 0.05% will
end up with over $300,000 more in total retirement savings after 40 years than if they had been charged annual fees of 2.05%. This will directly impact standard of living in retirement, and
may mean the difference between retiring when planned, or working several additional years. It is therefore very important that retirement investors understand what the fees are in a
retirement plan and how those fees impact their account balances. UPDATES ABOUT ACCOUNT BALANCES AND HOW MUCH INCOME TO EXPECT IN RETIREMENT ARE DEEMED ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT. Most respondents
say that it is very important to them to receive regular updates about their account balance and about how much income they can expect to receive in retirement. Many also say that regular
updates about performance, investment mix, and fees are very important: * Account balance, including each investment balance (64%) * How much income you can expect to receive per year in
retirement from your account balance (58%) * How the performance of your investments compares to other investments (45%) * Whether your investment mix is appropriate for your age (42%) * How
fees affect your investment returns (42%) * How fees for your investments compare to fees for other available investments (37%) MANY WOULD VALUE A PHONE NUMBER TO CALL WITH QUESTIONS AND AN
UPFRONT SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS. When asked how their retirement plan notices could be improved, nearly half (48%) of retirement plan participants 50 or over say that it would be helpful for
notices to include a phone number for participants to call if they have questions. Nearly as many say that the following would also be helpful: an upfront summary of key points (43%), an
online resource center (40%), and simplified language (39%). METHODOLOGY Interviews were conducted from March 14–18, 2024 using the Foresight 50+ Omnibus. The final sample includes 595 U.S.
adults 50-plus who have either an employer-sponsored retirement savings plan or an employer-funded traditional pension plan from a current or former employer. Funded and operated by NORC at
the University of Chicago, Foresight 50+ is a probability-based panel designed to be representative of the U.S. household population age 50 or older. Interviews were conducted online and via
phone. All data are weighted by age, sex, education, race/ethnicity, region, and AARP membership. For more information, contact S. Kathi Brown in AARP Research at [email protected]. Media
inquiries should be directed to [email protected].
Trending News
Video Author Angeline Boulley talks about her new book, 'Firekeeper’s Daughter' - ABC NewsABC NewsVideoLiveShowsShopStream onTrump vs. Harvard Stocks climb RFK Jr.'s MAHA report 'Diddy' trial Glacier collapse N...
Rfu give disciplinary update on blair cowan after red card - ruckTHE CHARGES AGAINST LONDON IRISH’S BLAIR COWAN WERE DEALT WITH ON TUESDAY. The player received two yellow cards – Contra...
404 Not Found!You're using an Ad-Blocker. BeforeItsNews only exists through ads.We ask all patriots who appreciate the evil we expose ...
Watch: nigel owens acting in a six nations mockumentaryINTERNATIONAL RUGBY REFEREE NIGEL OWENS HAS BEEN PREPARING FOR THE 2018 SIX NATIONS BY STARRING IN A MOCKUMENTARY ABOUT ...
Dubya endorses mitt as elevator door closesFinally, Mitt Romney got the endorsement he's been waiting for most all these months! "I'm for Mitt Romne...
Latests News
Retirement plan notices: current experiences and opportunities for improvementEmployer-sponsored retirement plans, including 401(k) plans, similar individual retirement savings plans, and traditiona...
I moved to france and became owner of a reclamation and salvage yardWhen Nick Powell, 55, came to France at the tender age of 20, it was to help with a building project on a house close to...
The discovery of catalytic rnaAccess through your institution Buy or subscribe In 1978, Tom Cech started his lab at the University of Colorado and the...
Phenotypic lentivirus screens to identify functional single domain antibodiesABSTRACT Manipulation of proteins is key in assessing their _in vivo_ function. Although genetic ablation is straightfor...
Multiplexed relative and absolute quantitative immunopeptidomics reveals mhc i repertoire alterations induced by cdk4/6 inhibitionABSTRACT Peptides bound to class I major histocompatibility complexes (MHC) play a critical role in immune cell recognit...