Standing vs. Sitting: which is better?

Aarp

Standing vs. Sitting: which is better?"


Play all audios:

Loading...

You’ve probably heard the fairly conventional wisdom that, all else being equal, standing is better for you than sitting. But the science behind that claim has sometimes been unclear or even


contradictory — a fact a recent analysis of dozens of studies tries to clear up. Its conclusion: Standing can help, but the results appear fairly modest. The metanalysis, by Mayo Clinic


researchers, concluded that standing for six hours a day burns an extra 54 calories. Over the course of a year, that could translate to a weight loss of more than five pounds, assuming a


person did not consume extra calories to make up for those lost. “Overall, our study shows that, when you put all the available scientific evidence together, standing accounts for more


calories burned than sitting,” Farzane Saeidifard, a study author and cardiology fellow at the clinic, said in a statement. The study, published in the _European Journal of Preventive


Cardiology_, was the first review and metanalysis to look at the difference between sitting and standing. It pulled in data from 46 studies involving 1,184 participants. “Standing for long


periods of time for many adults may seem unmanageable, especially those who have desk jobs, but, for the person who sits for 12 hours a day, cutting sitting time to half would give great


benefits,” said cardiologist Francisco Lopez-Jimenez, another of the study’s authors. The authors also said more research was needed to determine the longer-term effectiveness and health


implications of standing for longer periods. The analysis also provides some support to the benefits of even moderate physical activities in daily life. Researchers have been more closely


studying the benefits of what is called non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT), or calories burned through normal daily activities. “Standing is one of the components of NEAT, and the


results of our study support this theory,” Lopez-Jimenez said. “The idea is to work into our daily routines some lower-impact activities that can improve our long-term health.”


Trending News

Goethe as Natural Philosopher | Nature

ABSTRACT GOETHE, the greatest poet that Germany has produced, was a dominating intelligence who must claim a prominent p...

Sir nicholas goodison, magisterial stock exchange chairman who oversaw the ‘big bang’ – obituary

Telegraph Obituaries 13 July 2021 8:46pm BST Sir Nicholas Goodison, who has died aged 87, was an unusually cerebral chai...

Droplet genealogy | Nature Physics

The tendency of a stationary droplet, sitting on the surface of a large body of liquid, to eject a smaller droplet when ...

Nature cell biology - volume 14 issue 1, january 2012

FOCUS ON MEMBRANE DYNAMICS Cellular membranes in eukaryotes are dynamic structures. The budding and fusion of vesicles, ...

21 tell-tale signs you cannot live without street food - scoopwhoop

If these two words are all it takes to make your mouth water, then you’re truly, madly and deeply in love with street fo...

Latests News

Standing vs. Sitting: which is better?

You’ve probably heard the fairly conventional wisdom that, all else being equal, standing is better for you than sitting...

How Democrats' outreach to Black voters impacted the election | WFAE 90.7 - Charlotte's NPR News Source

How Democrats' outreach to Black voters impacted the election By Rachel Martin Published November 9, 2022 at 10:55 AM ES...

Gary sinise salutes america’s pearl harbor heroes

In January, the Gary Sinise Foundation was honored to be able to host Joe as part of our Soaring Valor Program. Although...

Getting your Ys crossed | Nature Reviews Genetics

The mammalian Y chromosome (chrY) has an unusual evolutionary history that has endowed it with similarly unusual feature...

Notes | Nature

ABSTRACT DR. L. A. BAUER'S resignation from the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey took effect on September 1....

Top