November 2, 2009 correspondence to david g. Reichert

Aarp

November 2, 2009 correspondence to david g. Reichert"


Play all audios:

Loading...

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 The Honorable David G. Reichert U.S. House of Representatives 1730 Longworth HOB Washington, D.C. 20515-4708 Dear Representative Reichert: Thank you for your follow-up


letter of October 15, asking for further information about AARP's positions on health care reform and the Medicare Advantage program. We again appreciate the opportunity to address


these issues, and we would be happy to meet at your convenience to discuss these matters further. AARP is a nonprofit, nonpartisan membership organization committed to helping people 50+


have independence, choice and control in ways that are affordable and beneficial to them and society as a whole. We carry out this commitment in many different ways- including through our


public policy and advocacy work, through our outreach and volunteer programs, in our publications and educational materials, and by providing access to member benefits that offer value and


socially responsible features. Like many other nonprofit organizations (such as professional associations and universities), AARP receives a royalty for allowing providers of these member


benefits to use the AARP name and intellectual property. This royalty income, along with the income from membership dues and other sources, helps us, in turn, continue to carry on this broad


range of activities serving the needs of our members and all people age 50+. We may, of course, not always agree with policymakers about the best ways to serve the age 50+ population and


society, but please be assured that AARP's positions on public policy matters are not developed in order to further AARP's financial interests. As we noted in our earlier


correspondence, AARP develops public policy positions through a process that is independent of any royalty-generating activities. This process involves input from AARP members and others,


research and analysis by AARP staff of older persons' needs, review by a volunteer National Policy Council, and, ultimately, approval by the all-volunteer AARP Board of Directors. We


would be happy to discuss this process with you further at your convenience. The remainder of this letter addresses the specific follow-up questions raised in your letter of October 15.


QUESTION 1. "You say that 'AARP does not have access to which Medicare-eligible members are enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Plan' ... Please explain, in detail, your advocacy


for HR 3200 in light of your lack of information regarding the number of members the bill will affect." I think there may be some confusion about our response to your initial question.


Your original September 21letter asked two different questions about AARP members enrolled in these types of plans. First, you asked how many AARP members were enrolled in Medicare


Advantage plans generally (i.e., all Medicare Advantage plans offered by all insurers). As we noted, we do not have this information. Enrollment in a Medicare Advantage plan is a private


transaction between a member and his or her insurer of choice. We know that approximately 11 million people are enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans generally, but we do not know how many of


these individuals are AARP members. Second, you asked how many AARP members were enrolled in the United Medicare Advantage plans carrying the AARP name. We noted that this information is


proprietary and confidential to United, and United did not give us permission to disclose this information in our letter of October 1. We have spoken with United again, and United has given


us permission to disclose both the total number of enrolled in these plans, as well as the number of enrollees who are AARP members. There are approximately one million enrollees in the


Medicare Advantage plans carrying the AARP name, and about 37 percent of those enrollees are AARP members. Please note that you do not have to be an AARP member to enroll in these United


plans. With respect to your question about our position on HR 3200, AARP has not, up to this point, endorsed a particular bill. We have, however, actively advocated for reform of our health


care system, and for the inclusion of provisions to protect our members and the age 50+ population in any health care reform legislation. Our Board is carefully evaluating the health care


reform proposals and weighing them against our public policy priorities, which include whether the legislation will improve Medicare -- such as by closing the coverage gap ("doughnut


hole") in part D, improving preventive benefits, and attacking waste fraud and abuse- and whether the legislation will provide affordable health care options to those not yet eligible


for Medicare, including strict limits on "age rating." QUESTION 2. "[According to AARP's most recent financial statements, 'Insurance premiums collected by the Plan


[AARP Insurance Plan] are paid directly by participants' •••• As AARP acts as the intermediary for collecting and paying insurance premiums on behalf of its members, how is it possible


that AARP does not have access to which of its members are enrolled in Medicare Advantage." Medicare Advantage premiums are not paid to, or collected by, the AARP Insurance Plan (the


"Trust"). Individuals enrolling in the Medicare Advantage plans send their enrollment forms and premium payments directly to United. In addition, for privacy reasons, United does


not give us the names of the individual members who enroll in these plans. We only receive periodic reports from United giving us the total number of plan enrollees (which includes both AARP


members and non-AARP members, because one does not need to be an AARP member to enroll in these plans). Once a year, United also gives us its estimated percentage of enrollees who are AARP


members. As noted above, these numbers are confidential and proprietary to United, and we did not have permission to disclose them in our letter of October 1. As we noted, we have


subsequently received permission, and the numbers are disclosed above.


Trending News

Narendra modi’s gold monetisation scheme: all you need to know about it

* Home * News * Narendra Modi’s Gold Monetisation Scheme: All you need to know about it PM MODI LAUNCHES THREE GOLD-RELA...

Excerpt from 'keep sharp: build a better brain at any age' by dr. Sanjay gupta | members only access

Find exclusive interviews, smart advice, free novels, full documentaries, fun daily features and much more — all a benef...

Sizewell c: too destructive, too costly, too late | thearticle

Joan Girling grew up near the Suffolk coast, with its little terns, barn owls, harebells, ladies bedstraw, sedums, blue ...

The wall street journals' news archive for may 22, 2025

Politics SUPREME COURT LETS TRUMP FIRE AGENCY OFFICIALS, BUT PROTECTS FED FROM INTERFERENCE 6:00 PM ET World GLOBAL FINA...

Best advice on selling an extra burial plot

​THE PROBLEM​ What do you do with burial plots you’re never going to use? That was the question two different readers as...

Latests News

November 2, 2009 correspondence to david g. Reichert

NOVEMBER 2, 2009 The Honorable David G. Reichert U.S. House of Representatives 1730 Longworth HOB Washington, D.C. 20515...

Locking women up is expensive - and it doesn't work. It's time for a new tack. | thearticle

If you didn’t know that the Good Loaf was there, you’d have a job finding it. The cavernous cafe with its enormous bread...

Royal family live: meghan urged to make humbling public apology

MEGHAN MARKLE 'HAPPY' FOR ARCHIE TO NOT HAVE TITLE SAYS EXPERT Last week, Meghan and Prince Harry sat down wit...

Is declining iq just a moral panic? | thearticle

In terms coined by South African criminologist, Stanley Cohen, a moral panic refers to intense feelings of fear, concern...

Pakistan continues World Cup surge with thrilling win over Afghanistan

In a game that ebbed and flowed to the hilt, Imad Wasim showed nerves of steel with an unbeaten 49 off 54 balls as Pakis...

Top