Aarp foundation legal advocacy: litigation cases

DOCKET: Case No. 1:23-cv-03129 Read AARP's Complaint (PDF)  FILED: November 16, 2023 CASE ISSUES:  Did FinePoints Private Duty Healthcare, LLC, unlawfully fail to pay their home care

workers all wages they were entitled to, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”)?  CASE NAME: Raymond, et al. v. Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. COURT:   U.S. Court of

Appeals, Tenth Circuit DOCKET: Case No. 23-3126 Read AARP's Orig. Complaint (PDF) Appellants’ Opening Brief (PDF)  FILED: July 11, 2023 CASE ISSUES:   Whether DCT properly granted

summary judgment on plaintiffs’ collective action ADEA disparate treatment termination and hiring claims.  CASE NAME: Dancy-Wilkins et al., v. Compu-Link Corporation et al. COURT:  US

District Court for the Eastern District of New York DOCKET: Case No. 2:22-cv-06208-JS-LGD Read AARP's Complaint (PDF)  FILED: October 14, 2022 CASE ISSUES:  Are reverse mortgage

borrowers nationwide who were charged excess attorney’s fees, prohibited appraisal and inspection costs, and inflated interest and mortgage insurance premiums related to foreclosures filed

without required advance notices entitled to have their mortgage balances corrected and to have the unfair practices stopped? CASE NAME: Jones v. Austin Industries COURT: EEOC  CHARGE NO.: 

2022-440-07338 FILED: 7/18/2022 Read: Article (AARP), Article (Reuters) CASE ISSUE: Does Austin’s wellness program, which imposing an insurance surcharge of up to $2400 per year for

nonparticipation, violate Americans with Disabilities Act and Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act requirements that such programs be voluntary?   CASE NAME: Nancy Reuschel, as

Executrix of the Estate of Louis Mcgraw, deceased; Loretta Holcomb, as Executrix of the Estate of Charlotte Rogers, deceased; and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Chancellor

Senior Management, LTD. COURT:  US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia CASE NO.: 5:22-cv-00279 Read Complaint (PDF)  FILED: July 7, 2022 CASE ISSUES:  Does Chancellor

Senior Management Ltd.’s practices of marketing certain levels of services to older persons, assessing the care needs of these persons upon their admission to its facilities and charging

fees based on those needs, but then failing to provide sufficient staff to meet those needs, constitute unfair and/or deceptive acts under West Virginia’s consumer protection statute? CASE

NAME: _Single v. Catholic Pioneer Church Homes_ COURT: Superior Ct., State of Cal., County of Sacramento    DOCKET: 2017-00220058 ORDER: 04/19/2022 Read Decision Ruling (4/15/2021), Press

Release, Original Press Release, Complaint (PDF), MSA Order (4/19/2022)  "Her Son Says She Was a Victim of Nursing Home Dumping," by Jessica Ravitz, the case story about Gloria

Single. Read CASE ISSUE: Can a nursing facility refuse to readmit a resident who has exercised her administrative due process rights and won the right to readmission?